Robocalls: vicarious liability of franchisors under the TCPA

by DLA Piper
Contact

In a FranCast issued last year, we reported on a case called Carolyn Anderson v. Domino’s Pizza, Inc., in which a district court dismissed a claim filed under a state version of the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA).   In that case, a consumer sought to hold a franchisor liable for illegal robocalls made by the franchisor’s franchisee (using a telemarketing firm).  

In dismissing the claim, the court relied on the fact that the state version did not contain the language “on whose behalf of,” which the court noted was contained in the federal version of the Act.  Franchisors have been concerned that this language in the federal Act will be used by consumers in support of allegations that a franchisor should be responsible under the TCPA for violations of the Act committed by its franchisees.

May parties on whose behalf telemarketing robocalls are made be held liable for that third party’s violations of the TCPA?  The Federal Communications Commission, the agency with authority to interpret the TCPA,  recently issued a Declaratory Ruling to answer that question. The Commission concluded that sellers who did not actually place calls may only be “vicariously” liable and subject to damages for third-party TCPA violations if federal common law principles of agency apply.

The TCPA’s restrictions on auto-dialed calls

The TCPA was enacted to regulate and monitor the use of telemarketing to consumers. Among other things, Section 227(b) prohibits calls made without consent and using “automatic telephone dialing systems” (as that term is defined in the TCPA).  Another section of the Act, Section 227(c), makes it unlawful to “initiate any telephone solicitation . . . to any residential telephone subscriber who has registered his or her telephone number on the national do-not-call registry.” Under each section, private parties may seek to recover damages and injunctive relief.  The provision authorizing the private right of action for violation of the “do-not-call” provisions contained the phrase “on behalf of,” while the provision authorizing the private right of action for violation of the “pre-recorded call” (and other) prohibitions did not contain this phrase.

The Commission’s recent ruling arises from two lawsuits involving claims that retailers were vicariously liable because they hired third parties that allegedly violated the TCPA.  At least one of the cases involved claims that the DISH Network was liable for unlawful pre-recorded calls that had been made by its dealers to telephone numbers on the national do-not-call registry.  In each case, the respective courts referred the matter to the Commission for clarification and a declaratory ruling.

The Commission rejects the expansive interpretation of the “on behalf of” language

The parties seeking to expand the scope of the TCPA argued that the “on behalf of” language should be interpreted to extend liability beyond the traditional agency principles.  They argued that, based on this language, a seller should be subject to vicarious liability for violations of both Sections 227(c) and 227(b) as long as the call is made simply to aid or benefit the seller, even if agency principles would not otherwise impose vicarious liability on the seller for the call.  However, the Commission rejected this interpretation in the context of its Declaratory Ruling, while noting that it was not precluding this interpretation with respect to the do-not-call prohibitions after an appropriate notice and comment rulemaking procedure.

The Commission’s ruling

The Commission concluded that retailers (such as franchisors) may be held vicariously liable under either Sections 227(b) or 227(c) only when federal common law agency principles apply.  Thus, vicarious liability under the TCPA, the Commission concluded, may only be imposed when there is a finding of (1) formal agency; (2) apparent authority; or (3) ratification.

The Commission expressly rejected arguments which sought to hold retailers vicariously liable simply because calls were made for the “benefit” of a retailer, whether or not agency principles would impose liability. As the Commission noted, merely “hav[ing] some role, however minor, in the causal chain that results in the making of a telephone call” will not subject a retailer to liability for the acts of third parties.  This is very significant for franchisors who consumers argued benefit from robocalls made by their franchisees (or by telemarketers on behalf of the franchisees).

The Commission provides guidance

In its ruling, the Commission provided examples of situations in which vicarious liability might be imposed, including:

  • circumstances where a seller “allows the outside sales entity access to information and systems that normally would be within the seller’s exclusive control, including: access to detailed information regarding the nature and pricing of the seller’s products and services or to the seller’s customer information”  
  • allowing an “outside sales entity to enter consumer information into the seller’s sales or customer systems, as well as the authority to use the seller’s trade name, trademark and service mark” (emphasis added)   
  • situations in which a retailer “knew (or reasonably should have known)” that a third party was violating the TCPA on the retailer’s behalf and failed to act.


Implications for franchisors

The potential implications of this Declaratory Ruling for franchisors are very significant.  While the Ruling should mean that franchisors will not be found vicariously liable under the TCPA for the unlawful robocalls made by their franchisees merely because of the “on behalf of” language in part of the TCPA, it is likely to result in consumers relying upon the traditional common law vicarious liability arguments often used against franchisors in an effort to hold them liable for their franchisee’s TCPA violations.

The Commission’s specific reference in one of its examples to allowing the sales entity to use the seller’s trademarks will certainly be cited by consumers in support of their claims.

Because of the potential damage exposure created by TCPA class actions (and much publicity has been given to those multimillion-dollar amounts), it is vitally important that franchisors review their current practices in this area, as well as the terms of their franchise agreements (particularly the independent contractor and indemnification clauses), to be in the best position to defend against any vicarious liability claims filed against them under the TCPA.

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.