Rx IP Update - November 2016

by Smart & Biggar
Contact

Smart & Biggar

Federal Court of Appeal opines on the framework for analyzing obviousness-type double-patenting

by Shirley Liang Komosa »

On November 4, 2016, the Federal Court of Appeal dismissed Apotex’s appeal in Apotex Inc v Eli Lilly Canada Inc, 2016 FCA 267 and upheld the Federal Court’s Order of prohibition for tadalafil (Eli Lilly’s CIALIS) regarding Patent No. 2,226,784 (“784 patent”) (previously reported). In doing so, the Federal Court of Appeal chose not to depart from its recent decision in Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC v Eli Lilly Canada Inc, 2016 FCA 119 (reported here), holding that Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc, 2000 SCC 67 (“Whirlpool”) did not settle the question of the relevant date for obviousness-type double-patenting. The Court also found Apotex’s argument with respect to insufficiency to be without merit.

Read more »


Supreme Court of Canada News

Supreme Court hears and reserves decision on “promise” of utility. As previously reported, the Supreme Court of Canada heard AstraZeneca’s appeal on the utility of AstraZeneca’s Nexium patent on November 8, 2016 and reserved its decision.

Amgen’s leave to appeal FCA decision re mootness denied: As previously reported, Amgen sought leave to appeal the Federal Court of Appeal’s dismissal of Amgen’s appeal from a decision declining to grant a prohibition order regarding Apotex’s filgrastim product GRASTOFIL (a biosimilar of Amgen’s NEUPOGEN): Amgen v Apotex, 2016 FCA 196. The Federal Court of Appeal had held the appeal was moot. On October 27, 2016, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed Amgen’s application for leave to appeal.


CETA Approved

As reported in our IP Update, CETA Receives Approval - What IP owners need to know, CETA was approved on October 30, 2016. See our article, Bill C-30 to implement CETA tabled in Canadian Parliament: implications for pharmaceuticals, for more information on implications for pharmaceuticals based on the text of Bill C-30 tabled on October 31, 2016: end to dual litigation, innovator right of appeal, patent-term extension (certificates of supplementary protection).


Patented Medicine Prices Review Board releases November NEWSletter

The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) released its November 2016 NEWSletter. Highlights include an update on phase 2 of the consultation process regarding the need to reform its Compendium of Policies, Guidelines and Procedures, which allows stakeholders who provided comments on the PMPRB Discussion Paper an opportunity to make oral submissions; updates on the status of proceedings relating to Alexion’s SOLIRIS (eculizumab), Galderma’s DIFFERIN, DIFFERIN XP, TACTUPUMP and TACTUPUMP FORTE, and Baxalta’s ONCASPAR (pegaspargase); and release of the first issue of the National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System’s Market Intelligence Report research series titled Market Intelligence Report: Biologic response modifier agents, 2015.


Health Canada News

Revisions made to Post-NOC Changes: Quality Guidance document. On November 3, 2016, Health Canada announced the release of the revised guidance document entitled Post-Notice of Compliance (NOC) Changes – Quality Guidance, regarding the conditions for the categorization of any post authorization change and recommendations for supporting documentation. Originally published in September 2009, the Guidance document was revised most recently in February 2016 (previously reported). The current revisions are effective immediately, and relate to the addition to Appendix 1 the conditions and supporting data for changes 2a and 2b.


Other Decisions

Glaxo’s claim for breach of good faith by Apotex in contract performance found viable. The Ontario Superior Court dismissed Apotex’s motion to strike portions of the Glaxo plaintiffs’ (“Glaxo’s”) Statement of Claim, including allegations of standing and breach of a duty of good faith in contract performance: GlaxoSmithKline Inc v Apotex Inc, 2016 ONSC 6768. Glaxo alleges that Apotex breached a settlement agreement by selling several years’ worth of valacyclovir hydrochloride (Glaxo’s VALTREX) during an agreed-upon six-month withdrawal from the marketplace. The Court found that it was not plain and obvious that GlaxoSmithKline Intellectual Property (No. 2) Ltd. (“GIP2”) had no standing. Glaxo plead the material facts to establish that Glaxo Group Ltd. had entered into the settlement agreement as an agent for GIP2. The Court also found that it was far from plain and obvious that Glaxo did not have a viable claim for breach of good faith in contract performance. That doctrine is entering into a developmental stage given the Supreme Court’s decision in Bhasin v Hrynew. Where the scope of a legal duty has not been fully settled in the jurisprudence, an allegation that the duty has been breached should not be struck.

Bayer entitled to elect between damages and an accounting of profits. The Federal Court previously found that Apotex and Cobalt infringed Bayer’s valid patent for an oral contraceptive composition combining drospirenone and ethinyl estradiol (Bayer’s YAZ and YASMIN) (2016 FC 1013, as reported here). In that judgment, Justice Fothergill requested written submissions addressing whether Bayer should be entitled to elect between damages and an accounting of the defendants’ profits. On October 27, 2016, the Court held that Bayer is entitled to elect: Bayer Inc v Cobalt Pharmaceuticals Company, 2016 FC 1192.

On behalf of both defendants, Apotex argued that it, not Bayer, should decide Bayer’s remedy. Specifically, Apotex argued that Bayer should not be entitled to damages, but only to an accounting of profits. Apotex relied on the fact that it had complied with the PMNOC Regulations, and successfully alleged non-infringement of Bayer’s patent in the PMNOC application. The Court disagreed, finding a patentee cannot be deprived of its statutory right to damages.


New Court proceedings

Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations

Medicine:

teriparatide (FORTEO)

Applicants:

Eli Lilly Canada Inc and Eli Lilly and Company, US

Respondents:

Teva Canada Limited and the Minister of Health

Date Commenced:

October 21, 2016

Court File No.:

T-1805-16

Comment:

Application for Order of prohibition until expiry of Patents Nos. 2,314,313 and 2,325,371. Teva alleges invalidity and non-infringement.

To check the status of Federal Court cases, please click here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Smart & Biggar | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Smart & Biggar
Contact
more
less

Smart & Biggar on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.