Scandalous and Immoral Trademarks Awarded First Amendment Protection

by Bracewell LLP

Bracewell LLP

On December 15, the Federal Circuit held that the prohibition on the registration of scandalous and immoral trademarks is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment.  In re Brunetti, No. 2015-1109, 2017 WL 6391161 (Fed. Cir. 2017).  This decision follows the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Matal v. Tam, in which the Court unanimously held that the prohibition on registration of disparaging trademarks violated the First Amendment.  See 137 S. Ct. 1744 (June 19, 2017).

The Scandalous and Immoral Marks Provision
The scandalous and immoral marks provision (“Scandalous-Marks Provision”), §2(a) of the Lanham Act, prohibited registration of a trademark that “[c]onsists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt or disrepute.”  15 U.S.C. §1052(a). 

Under §2(a), a mark was considered scandalous or immoral if a “substantial composite of the general public” would find the mark “shocking to the sense of propriety, offensive to the conscience or moral feelings or calling out for condemnation.” See Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure § 1203.01.

The Registration at Issue
In re Brunetti involved the registration of FUCT for “athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps; children's and infant's apparel, namely, jumpers, overall sleepwear, pajamas, rompers and one-piece garments.” U.S. Serial No. 85310960. 

In 2013, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) examiner refused to register FUCT because the term was scandalous and alluded to a profanity, and in 2014, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) affirmed the refusal. In re Brunetti, Appeal No. 85310960 (T.T.A.B. 2014).  The applicant subsequently appealed the refusal to the Federal Circuit.

Reversal on the Ban of Scandalous and Immoral Marks
The Federal Circuit found that the term FUCT is vulgar, and therefore, scandalous per se under §2(a) of the Lanham Act.  However, the Court held that §2(a) itself is unconstitutional because it discriminates speech based on expressive content in violation of the First Amendment and the government does not have a compelling, or even substantial, interest in regulating scandalous and immoral marks.

First, the Federal Circuit determined that trademark registration is not a government subsidy or an exercise of the government’s spending power. The Federal Circuit relied on the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Tam, where the Supreme Court stated that the trademark registry is not comparable to other forms of subsidies and does not implicate the government’s spending power.  Tam, 137 S. Ct. at 1761. Rather, the only exchange of funds in the trademark application and registration process is from the applicant to the PTO.  Further, “[t]he government’s involvement in processing and issuing trademarks does not transform trademark registration into a government subsidy.” In re Brunetti, 2017 WL 6391161 at *8. 

Second, the Court refused to categorize the trademark register as a metaphysical limited public forum.  Id. at *11 (quoting Tam, 137 S. Ct. at 1760 (“For if the registration of trademarks constituted government speech, other systems of government registration could easily be characterized in the same way.”)).  The Court reasoned that allowing the trademark register to qualify as a limited public forum would have far-reaching effects and refusals would “chill speech anywhere from the Internet to the grocery store.” Id.   

Third, the Court applied strict scrutiny to the Scandalous-Marks Provision because it prohibited speech based on expressive content. The Federal Circuit held that the Scandalous-Marks Provision failed to meet the heightened standard, requiring the provision to serve a compelling government interest through a narrowly tailored statute.

Fourth, not only did the Scandalous-Marks Provision fail to survive strict scrutiny, but it failed survive intermediate scrutiny as well.  Specifically, the government could not identify a substantial government interest served by the provision.  At oral argument, the government articulated that “Congress’ primary interest is the promotion of the use of non-scandalous marks in commerce.”  Id. at *13. However, the Supreme Court in Tam rejected the government’s argument that trademarks qualify as government speech, see 137 S. Ct. at 1757-61, and here, the Federal Circuit stated that “the government does not have a substantial interest in promoting certain trademarks over others.” In re Brunetti, 2017 WL 6391161 at *13 “[T]he fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”  Id.

Finally, the Federal Circuit noted its duty to preserve the constitutionality of statutes through a narrow construction, when possible. Nevertheless, the Court struck down §2(a) because the provision is “excessively sweeping even as narrowed.”  Id. at *16. Although the use and registration of vulgar, crass, or lewd marks may be disturbing, the First Amendment protects the private expression of ideas, even when the expressions are offensive, immoral, or scandalous. Accordingly, the Court held that the ban on scandalous and immoral marks is unconstitutional.

In his concurrence, Judge Dyk noted that the Federal Circuit is obligated to adopt a narrow construction of the statute to avoid constitutional questions and suggested limiting the Scandalous-Marks Provision to obscene marks, which are not protected by the First Amendment.

With this recent reversal of the ban on scandalous and immoral marks, the responsibility for what is and is not acceptable to societal moral standards now falls to consumers. The market is now the arbiter of whether society is ready to accept a scandalously branded product.

For more information on the background of the Scandalous-Marks Provision, please click here.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bracewell LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bracewell LLP

Bracewell LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.