SEC Releases First Full-Year Report on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program: No Speedy Recoveries for Whistleblowers

by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

[authors: Mike Delikat and Rachel Coe]

On November 15, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission released its Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Report on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program (the “Report”), the first full-year report issued since the enactment of Dodd-Frank.  The Report analyzes the 3,001 tips received over the last twelve months by the Commission’s Office of the Whistleblower (“OWB”) , which is responsible for the implementation and execution of the Commission’s whistleblower program.  The Report also provides additional information  on the whistleblower award evaluation process that resulted in its first (and only) award issuance in August 2012.

Activities of the Commission’s OWB

The OWB was created pursuant to Section 924(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act.  OWB reviews and processes whistleblower tips through the Commission’s Tips, Complaints, and Referrals (“TCR”) System, leveraging resources of the Commission’s Office of Market Intelligence to evaluate tips and assign them to the appropriate division.  OWB works closely with the Enforcement Division throughout the investigative process, serving as a liaison between the whistleblowers or their counsel and Enforcement staff.  OWB arranges meetings between whistleblowers and investigators or subject matter experts within Enforcement to advance investigations.  OWB also communicates with other agencies’ whistleblower offices, including the IRS, Department of Justice, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the Department of Labor’s OSHA.

Breakdown of Tips Received in FY 2012

In order to be eligible for a whistleblower award, individuals must submit a “Form-TCR” through the Commission’s TCR System by mail, fax, or through the online TCR questionnaire portal.  During FY 2012, the SEC received 3,001 whistleblower tips through its TCR System and issued 143 enforcement judgments and orders that potentially qualify as eligible for a whistleblower award.1

Type of Allegation

The most common type of allegations were: Corporate Disclosure and Financials (18.2%); Offering Fraud (15.5%); and Manipulation (15.2%).  Interestingly, 23.4% of individuals selected “Other” as the allegation type, indicating that their tip did not fit into one of the nine categories provided on the TCR.  The OWB did not indicate whether it intended to modify the allegation categories.

The number of tips received remained consistent throughout the year, with an average of 250 tips received per month.  The most tips received in one month was 313 in May 2012, and the fewest was 166 in November 2011.

Geographic Breakdown

The Commission received tips from all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and from 49 countries outside of the U.S.  Of the whistleblower tips received, 2,507 (83.5%) originated in the United States, and 324 (10.8%) originated from abroad (5.7% of tipsters did not specify a geographic location).  Domestically, the largest number of TCRs were submitted from California (17.4%) followed by New York (9.8%) and Florida (8.1%). 

Of the 324 tips received from abroad, 74 originated from the United Kingdom, 46 from in Canada, 33 from India, 27 from China, and 21 from Australia.  The remainder of countries submitted ten or fewer TCRs.

Whistleblower Incentive Awards

The Report provides  details regarding the process through which it evaluates and issues whistleblower award claims.  OWB posts a “Notice of Covered Action” for each Commission enforcement action resulting in a final judgment or order resulting in monetary sanctions exceeding $1 million.  Individuals have 90 days from the time a Notice of Covered Action is posted to apply for a whistleblower incentive award by submitting a completed "FORM WB-APP".  OWB posted 143 Notices of Covered Actions in FY 2012, a drop from 170 Notices in FY 2011. 

OWB processes all award applications and submits applications to the Claims Review Staff, a team designated by the Director of Enforcement.  The Claims Review Staff makes a “Preliminary Determination” as to whether the incentive award claim should be allowed or denied.  If allowed, the Claims Review Staff proposes a percentage amount.  If the Claims Review Staff issues an award, the Preliminary Determination is forwarded to the Commission for review. 

If a claim is denied, an applicant can ask for reconsideration of the Preliminary determination, in which case the Claims Review Staff reevaluates its decision before issuing a Proposed Final Determination for Commission review.  If the applicant does not object, the denial becomes the Final Order of the Commission.

Within 30 days of receiving a Proposed Final Determination, any Commissioner may request a full Commission review.  If no request is made, the Proposed Final Determination becomes the Final Order of the Commission.

First Whistleblower Award Issued in August 2012

The Commission issued its first whistleblower award in August 2012, paying the maximum 30 percent payout allowed by law.  The award recipient submitted a tip concerning a multi-million dollar fraud and provided documents and other “significant information” that allowed investigators to issue an emergency action in federal court before further investment funds were dissolved.  The court ordered more than $1 million in sanctions, over $150,000 of which had been collected by the end of the fiscal year.  The award recipient initially received nearly $50,000, and was recently awarded an additional $500 in September 2012.  Motions for additional judgments are pending in court; any additional collections, or an increase in sanctions ordered, will result in further payments to the whistleblower.


The Report does not state how many award claims have been reviewed by the Claims Review Staff, nor does it provide statistics regarding the number of Preliminary or Proposed Final Determinations made in FY 2012.  Although the Commission has finally shed light on the process by which it evaluates whistleblower award claims, it remains unclear whether there has been any correlation between whistleblower tips received and award claims made through OWB.  While it was anticipated that it would take time to make awards given the process described above, the fact that only one cash award has been made 14 months after the program began and that the one award was relatively modest (less that $50,000) cannot be particularly encouraging for tipsters hoping to quickly cash in on original information. There likely is also disappointment with the slow pace of the process among and the expanding cadre of whistleblower lawyers that have aggressively pursued clients in this area.

Additionally, while the SEC’s regulations under Dodd-Frank indicate that the OWB would also be involved in investigation of complaints of retaliation for whistleblowing under Dodd-Frank, the Report also does not indicate what if any proceedings the OWB has initiated to investigate complaints of retaliation. It is clear, however, in light of the Report and the comments of SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro who stated that insiders are providing the SEC “with high-quality roadmaps of fraudulent wrongdoing”, that the 3,001 tips filed in FY 2012 constitutes a significant increase in employees and others going directly to the SEC.

The Report also leads to the conclusion that companies that have developed robust internal compliance programs should continue to encourage employees to report internally.  From a policy standpoint, the lengthy delay between tips being filed and enforcement actions by the SEC is not the most effective way to expeditiously uncover and remedy corporate wrongdoing when it exists.

For more information, please visit our Whistleblower page at or contact the co-chairs of Orrick's Whistleblower Task Force: Mike Delikat and Mike Torpey.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.