Second Circuit Holds Class Action Waiver Unenforceable in American Express Arbitration Agreement Despite the Supreme Court’s Recent Decision in Stolt-Nielsen

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact

In May 2010, the Supreme Court directed the Second Circuit to reconsider its decision in In re American Express Litigation regarding the unenforceability of a class action waiver in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Stolt-Nielsen, S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 130 S. Ct. 1758 (2010). See American Express Company v. Italian Colors Restaurant, 130 S. Ct. 2401 (Mem.) (May 3, 2010) (vacating 554 F.3d 300 (2d Cir. 2009)). On remand, the Second Circuit found its original analysis unaffected by Stolt-Nielsen and held that the class action waiver within the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because “the cost of plaintiffs’ individually arbitrating their dispute with Amex would be prohibitive, effectively depriving plaintiffs of the statutory protections of the antitrust laws.” In re American Express, No. 06-1871 at 3, 18 (2d Cir. March 8, 2011).

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
Contact
more
less

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide