Second Circuit Vacates Restitution Order in Complex Fraud Case

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

On December 3, 2019, the Second Circuit (Kearse, Pooler, Livingston) issued a decision in United States v. Calderon, et al., reversing an $18 million restitution order and otherwise affirming the defendants convictions and sentences.  In reversing the restitution order, the Court determined that the defendants’ fraud had not proximately caused the financial losses suffered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and certain banks.

Background

The defendants’ convictions arose from their involvement in a scheme to defraud two banks, Deutsche Bank and CoBank, in connection with an export guarantee program administered by USDA.  Some background on the nature of international transactions is necessary to understand the case.

International Transactions Involving Physical Goods

As described by the Court, international business transactions involving the sale of physical goods are carried out through the use of unique documents and contracts that serve to mitigate risk among geographically disparate parties.  To mitigate the risk of nonpayment by a foreign importer, American exporters will bargain for and include in the sales contract a term that will require payment by a “confirmed and irrevocable letter of credit.”  Once the contract is signed, the foreign importer will then apply to an “issuing bank”—which is usually a foreign bank—to receive that letter of credit.  The issuing bank will then issue the letter of credit in favor of the American exporter.  The letter of credit constitutes an “irrevocable promise” to pay the exporter when it presents certain documents that conform to the terms of the credit.  At the same time that the letter of credit is secured, the American exporter typically works with a “confirming bank”—which is usually a domestic bank—and assigns its right to payment on the letter of credit to the domestic bank in exchange for immediate payment of the contract price.  This triggers the issuing bank’s obligation to reimburse the confirming bank, which is done over time and with interest.

In order to receive immediate payment from the confirming bank, an exporter must compile a complete set of documents and present them to the confirming bank.  Among these documents is a “bill of lading,” which is a contract between either the exporter or importer and an international carrier obligating the carrier to transport the goods to the importer’s location.  The government’s prosecution arose from the defendants’ presentation of altered bills of lading to confirming banks in order to induce those banks to honor their obligations under various letters of credit.

In connection with these sorts of international transactions, a confirming bank has two duties when it examines documents for the purpose of obtaining payment on a letter of credit.  First, it must determine whether the documents conform exactly to the terms of the letter of credit.  Second, it must respond if it finds any discrepancies.  Under the law in many jurisdictions, if the documents provided by an exporter to the confirming bank do not strictly comply with the letter of credit, the issuing bank is entitled to refuse to honor the letter of credit.  Even if nonconforming documents were honored, an issuing bank could still sue a confirming bank after the fact for “wrongful honor.”

USDA’s GSM-102 Program and the Defendants’ Scheme

USDA has implemented a program called GSM-102 which provides an incentive for U.S. banks to participate in letters of credit export transactions with developing nations.  In the sorts of transactions described above, the confirming domestic bank bears the risk that a foreign issuing bank will default on its payment obligations under the letter of credit, resulting in a situation in which the domestic bank may be unable to obtain redress.  Accordingly, USDA encourages domestic banks to participate in such transactions by typically guaranteeing 98% of the foreign bank’s obligation under the letter of credit.

The defendants participated in the GSM-102 program as financial intermediaries who structured third-party transactions.  The defendants would pay a fee to “rent” or “purchase” GSM-102 eligible trade flows from exporters and importers.  After acquiring the trade flow, the defendants would arrange for letters of credit between foreign and domestic banks backed by the USDA guarantee.  As part of this process, the defendants were responsible for presenting complying documents to the confirming domestic banks.  The defendants made money through this process by receiving a fee from the foreign banks involved. 

At trial, the government presented evidence showing that the defendants falsified bills of lading before presenting them to Deutsche Bank and CoBank (two confirming banks) in order to make the bills of lading facially compliant with the terms of the relevant letters of credit and the requirements of the GSM-102 program.  The defendants did not deny making the modifications of the documents, but stated that the changes were insignificant, and that the changes “made it easier for everybody” in the transaction. 

Following the global financial crisis in 2007-08, several issuing banks defaulted on their obligations under various letters of credit arranged by the defendants.  USDA therefore reimbursed the confirming bank the full amount available under the GSM-102 guarantee.

Jury Deliberations, Verdict, and Restitution Order

The jury deliberated for approximately a week after an 18-day trial, at which point it informed the trial court that it was deadlocked on some counts.  The trial court gave a modified Allen charge that encouraged the jury to continue deliberating.  The jury subsequently returned a verdict (1) convicting Defendant Lillemoe on one count of conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud and five substantive counts of wire fraud, and (2) convicting Defendant Calderon on the conspiracy count and one substantive count of wire fraud.  The defendants—including a third defendant, Zirbes—were acquitted on all other charges, including various counts of wire fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, and false statements. 

The trial court subsequently entered a restitution order as to both defendants, finding that USDA was entitled to approximately $18 million in restitution after reimbursing the banks in the GSM-102 program for various transactions involving the defendants.

The defendants appealed their convictions and the restitution order, raising four issues addressed by the Court in its decision.

The Court’s Analysis

The defendants first challenged the sufficiency of the evidence underlying their convictions, arguing that the government (1) failed to offer sufficient evidence regarding the “materiality” of their alterations to the bills of lading, and (2) failed to present sufficient evidence that they intended to deprive the victim banks of money or property.  The Court rejected both of these contentions.  On the first point, the defendants argued that their alterations were not material because the bills of lading appeared to be compliant with the letters of credit and GSM-102 program.  As a result, the defendants contended that the issuing banks would not have been able to sue the confirming bank—the issuing banks were presented with evidence that the shipment was program compliant.  The Court quickly dispatched with this argument, noting that “under the Defendants’ theory, the better the fraudster, the less likely he is to have committed fraud.”  The Court likewise held that the modifications were not needless but were changed so as to prevent the rejection of the bills of lading.  On the second point, the Court noted that a deprivation of property could include intangible interests such as the right to control one’s assets.  It further observed that it had previously upheld fraud convictions where misrepresentations exposed a lender to unexpected economic risk.  The Court found that standard easily met here, where the evidence showed that the modifications to the bills of lading (1) exposed the confirming banks to risk of default or non-reimbursement from the foreign issuing banks, and (2) increased the risk that USDA would decline to reimburse the banks in the event of the foreign bank’s default.  The bottom line of the Court’s analysis seemed to be that the submission of forged bills of lading is not the sort of thing that can be brushed off with a “no harm, no foul” approach under the wire fraud statute.

The defendants’ second challenge concerned two jury instructions, only one of which they objected to at trial.  First, the defendants challenged the trial court’s decision to give a “no ultimate harm” charge to the jury.  The Court rejected this argument because the defendants’ trial strategy—in which they focused on the fact that the banks were ultimately reimbursed by USDA for their losses—created the factual predicate for the charge (which the district court originally declined to give, until it ruled that the door was opened).  The Court also found that the instruction that was given correctly required the jury to find intent to defraud and did not cause any confusion.  Second, the defendants challenged the district court’s instruction regarding the elements of bank fraud, which the Court reviewed only for plain error.  The defendants contended that the district court should have instructed the jury that a bank fraud conviction requires a finding that the defendant “contemplated harm or injury to the victim.”  But the Court found that the absence of this language did not affect the defendants’ substantial rights because the jury acquitted them on the substantive bank fraud charge, while the conspiracy charge concerned both wire fraud and bank fraud meaning that the conspiracy conviction could have rested on the wire fraud alone. [1]

The defendants’ third challenge concerned the trial court’s modified Allen charge, which the defendants claimed was improper after the jury reached an apparent deadlock. The Court rejected this argument, finding that the modified Allen charge contained “all of the safeguards, and none of the pitfalls,” that have been recognized as relevant to an assessment of such charges.  In particular, the Court observed that the trial court repeatedly warned the jurors not to surrender their conscientiously held beliefs and did not inform jurors that they were required to reach an agreement.

The defendants’ fourth—and only successful—challenge concerned the trial court’s restitution order.  The Court noted that the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (“MVRA”) requires a court to order restitution in the full amount of each victim’s losses in the case of an “offense resulting in…loss or destruction of property.”  The defendants argued that the banks were not “victims” under the MVRA because their financial losses were not directly and proximately caused by the alleged fraud.  The Court agreed, noting that the MVRA’s proximate cause requirement was akin to the “loss causation” requirement associated with securities fraud cases.  The Court observed that the defendants’ fraud concealed two risks from the domestic banks at issue: (1) that the issuing bank would refuse to honor the letter of credit on the theory that the confirming bank had failed to demand a valid, conforming presentation; and (2) that USDA would decline to reimburse the banks for their losses because the transactions were not GSM-102 compliant.  According to the Court, neither of these risks materialized.  Instead, the foreign banks defaulted on their obligations due to their inability to fulfill them following the “global financial crisis.”  The Court found that the specific losses therefore turned on the creditworthiness of the foreign banks, which implicated a risk that was borne solely by the banks and USDA because they had pre-approved the defaulting banks for participation in these transactions.   The Court cast the actions of the domestic banks in a dim light, writing that they “made a bet that the foreign banks would be able to repay the relevant loans with interest and their assessments as to advisability of that bet were completely unrelated to the risks concealed by Defendants’ fraud.”

Discussion

The Court’s decision in Calderon illustrates the close scrutiny that large restitution orders may draw, particularly where there are concerns that such an order may result in an unjustified windfall to the victims.  We saw not long ago the Supreme Court adopt a narrow view of the restitution provisions in Lagos v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1684 (2018).  The Court was clear on this point, stating: “The MVRA provides redress to victims of fraud, but it does not supply a windfall for those who independently enter into risky financial enterprises through no fault of the fraudsters.  This is somewhat different from the approach taken by the Court in a 2017 summary order in United States v. Frenkel, 682 F. App’x 20 (2d Cir. 2017) (see this blog’s prior coverage here) where the Court rejected a defendant’s argument that the loss amount for purposes of Section 2B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines should be reduced because the collapse in the real estate market was a significant contributing factor to the loss amount.  There, the Court held that the defendant should have reasonably anticipated declining market conditions.  While the question of proximate cause may not be hotly disputed in run-of-the-mill fraud cases, there may be other cases like Calderon that present interesting questions of loss causation with respect to a global financial crisis (the last one or perhaps the next one) that should be carefully considered by defense counsel. 


[1] On this legal point, the Court avoided deciding an interesting question.  In United States v. Nkansah, 699 F. 3d 743, 748 (2d Cir. 2012), the Court reversed (over an objection by Judge Lynch) a conviction for bank fraud in the absence of evidence of intent to defraud a bank.  But two years later in Loughrin v. United States, 134 S. Ct. 2384 (2014), Justice Kagan held that the government did not need to “prove that a defendant charged with [bank fraud] intended to defraud a bank.”  Whether Loughrin overruled Nkansah is left for another day.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact
more
less

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.