Second Highest Penalty in FCPA History Comes with a Caution from the Bench about the Limits of the Act’s Jurisdiction

by Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP
Contact

In Brief

  • The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act covers a nearly boundless range of business conduct by issuers and their agents in an ever more global world. Yet the contrast in sentences handed down in two recent FCPA cases illustrates the limits of this law. The concept of “minimum contacts” acts as a restraint on prosecution, even if only for foreign nationals.

A $100 million bribery scheme and cover-up involving Siemens AG has resulted in very different outcomes for two company officials who faced charges under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). Former Siemens AG Managing Board Member Uriel Sharef must pay a $275,000 civil penalty for his conduct, the second largest penalty ever assessed in a case involving the FCPA. The other, Siemens Argentina CEO Herbert Steffen, had all claims against him dismissed.

At the crux of these contrasting rulings – both handed down this year by United States District Judge Shira A. Scheindlin – was prosecutors’ ability to establish whether the Siemens officials, who are both foreign nationals, had “minimum contact” with the United States government in their dealings. These divergent results provide an opportunity to assess the role that “minimum contacts” play in a determination of FCPA exposure for individuals subject to scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and Department of Justice.

Siemens was subject to such scrutiny when, after bribing Argentine officials in a decades-long scheme to retain a government contract to produce national identity cards, the company made false certifications in its SEC filings to cover up its actions. These certifications were required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

In determining whether it could assert jurisdiction in each Siemens official’s case, the District Court had to find “certain minimum contacts with [the United States] such that the maintenance of the suit does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Sharef, 11 Civ. 9073, at 11 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 19, 2013). Minimum contacts can be established when:

(1) the defendant has “followed a course of conduct directed at” the jurisdiction of the United States,

(2) the effects in the United States occur “as a direct and foreseeable result” of the extraterritorial conduct, and

(3) the defendant knows or has good reason to know that his conduct will result in the United States asserting jurisdiction over him.

Even if this standard is satisfied, other factors may make the exercise of jurisdiction unreasonable, including the burden on the defendant and the interests of the United States in obtaining relief.

The District Court found sufficient facts to support “minimum contacts” as to Sharef, but not as to Steffen. Sharef had recruited Steffen “to facilitate the payment of bribes” to Argentine officials. Steffen then met with the CFO of the Siemens operating group that was to pay the bribes to “pressure” him to authorize bribes, and participated in one phone call with Sharef to urge Sharef to make additional payments in response to demands from the Argentine government. But the CFO of the Siemens operating group would not pay the bribes until he spoke with several “higher ups,” above Steffen, like Sharef, and deemed Sharef’s response as his instructions to bribe. The CFO then instructed numerous subordinates to generate a series of fictitious documents to facilitate the payments and to obscure the audit trail. The District Court attributed this conduct to Sharef’s order to the CFO.

In contrast to Sharef, Steffen did not engage in the production of the fictitious documents that supported the false certifications, and Judge Scheindlin found that Steffen’s actions were “far too attenuated from the resulting harm to establish minimum contacts” with the United States. The District Court acknowledged that Steffen “urged” and “pressured” the CFO to pay the bribes, but placed substantial weight on the fact that the CFO had only agreed to proceed after receiving instructions directly from several other “higher ups,” including Sharef. The District Court viewed Steffen’s involvement as merely tangential to the subsequent cover-up via the false SEC filings and supporting fictitious documents.

Judge Scheindlin expressed concern that jurisdiction could extend to anyone allegedly involved in a bribery scheme “no matter how attenuated their connection with the falsified financial statements” if she asserted jurisdiction over Steffen. “If this court were to hold that Steffen’s support for the bribery scheme satisfied the minimum contacts analysis, even though he neither authorized the bribe, nor directed the cover up, much less played any role in the falsified [securities] filings, minimum contacts would be boundless,” she said.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP
Contact
more
less

Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.