Security Interest v. License Agreement: Low Tech Precautions for the High Tech Investment

by Dorsey & Whitney LLP

In this exciting age of startups, the market is brimming with opportunities for individuals and entities alike to invest in emerging companies.  Today’s rapid rate of technology development justifies investors’ eagerness to take an interest in innovative companies, hoping to find the next “unicorn.”  Notwithstanding the fast pace of the tech industry, it remains important for investors to conduct due diligence before kicking funds into any business, especially when bargaining for a security interest or license.  The Sixth Circuit’s recent decision in Cyber Solutions International LLC v. Pro Marketing Sales Inc., 634 Fed. App. Appx. 557 (6th Cir. 2016) provides a reminder that failure to take basic precautions, as simple as conducting a lien search, could result in grave consequences and perhaps the total loss of an investment.

In Cyber Solutions, two lenders claimed ownership over microchip encryption technology known as Tamper Reactive Secure Storage (“TRSS”) developed by Priva Technologies, Inc.  Lender number one, Pro Marketing Sales, Inc. provided Priva a secured loan during its early stages developing the technology that preceded TRSS, known as Secured Key Storage Integrated Circuit (“SKSIC”).  As is typical in secured lending arrangements, Pro Marketing’s security agreement with Priva provided Pro Marketing a first-position lien on all assets owned and to be acquired by Priva, including intellectual property.

Within three years of obtaining financing from Pro Marketing, Priva filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in Michigan.  As part of Priva’s reorganization, it sought to develop assets it could use to pay its debts.  During this time, Priva negotiated a Design Service and Intellectual Property License Agreement with lender number two, Cyber Solutions International, LLC.  Pursuant to the license agreement, in exchange for two payments of $200,000 from Cyber Solutions, Priva would provide Cyber Solutions an exclusive license to and other rights in the technology that started out as SKSCI but, thanks to Cyber Solutions’ investment, became a “second generation SKSIC product” known as TRSS.

When Priva sought approval by the bankruptcy court of its license agreement with Cyber Solutions as part of its plan of reorganization, Pro Marketing objected, arguing that the license provided to Cyber Solutions was subordinate to Pro Marketing’s lien under the security agreement.  The bankruptcy court approved the license agreement but acknowledged that the court would not stop Pro Marketing from foreclosing on Priva’s IP; hence, Cyber Solutions assumed the risk with its investment in IP that was secured by a prior lien.  Priva continued to develop TRSS during its bankruptcy.

Subsequently, Priva’s plan of reorganization did not reach fruition, and cash shortages forced Priva to convert its case to a chapter 7 liquidation.  Priva agreed to allow Pro Marketing to foreclose on all its IP, including TRSS, and terminated its agreement with Cyber Solutions.  In turn, Cyber Solutions filed suit against Pro Marketing seeking a declaration that the license agreement was enforceable and possession of the TRSS technology.  Its position was that TRSS was not within the scope of Pro Marketing’s lien.  Cyber Solutions was unsuccessful.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted the security agreement and the license agreement by their respective plain meaning. Unsurprisingly, the security agreement broadly defined the scope of intellectual property included as collateral securing its loan:  “‘all rights, priorities and privileges relating to’ copyrights, trademarks, patents and trade secrets, ‘as well as mask works fixed in semi-conductor chip products.’”  On the other hand, the license agreement with Cyber Solutions provided for Priva to assign to Cyber Solutions “all right, title and interest in and to any and all updates, modifications, or improvements” to Priva technology funded by Cyber Solutions.  The license agreement also included a provision acknowledging the existence of liens on Priva’s pre-TRSS technology.

The court read the assignment provision as a recognition that rights to the technology belonged to Priva, because before intellectual property rights are in a position to be assigned, ownership must reside in the assignor.  Thus, the initial acquisition by Priva of rights in its own IP meant that TRSS fell within the broad definition of collateral in the security agreement and was subject to foreclosure by Pro Marketing. The court also held that Priva lacked the authority to grant Cyber Solutions superior rights in the TRSS technology via a license agreement because the security agreement with Pro Marketing prohibited the transfer of any interest in the collateral without the prior written consent of Pro Marketing, which had not been obtained. Finally, the court considered the acknowledgment provision as a sign that Cyber Solutions assumed the risk of the consequence the court dealt.

Cyber Solutions is a good reminder of caveat emptor or “buyer beware.”  Not everyone has the sort of warning that Cyber Solutions had before taking a security interest or rights in IP:  by virtue of Priva’s status as a bankruptcy debtor, information regarding its capital structure, including its secured debt, was publicly available.  Plus, the license agreement included a term referencing Pro Marketing’s lien.  Investors should seek out and pay attention to information indicating that another party might have greater rights to the property they seek, be it IP or something else.

There are a number of measures a party negotiating a security or licensing agreement can take to prevent a Cyber Solutions-like outcome.  A simple first step is to conduct a title search on the counterparty’s property to determine whether the desired property is already subject to liens.  Whether the results cause the investor to abandon the prospective transaction should depend on the value of the asset at stake and the extent that it is encumbered.  A party that wishes to continue with a transaction despite pre-existing liens could try to contract around them.  For example, the investor could approach the prior lienholder to negotiate a carve-out of rights in favor of the investor.  After all, additional investment in the asset may benefit a prior lienholder.

If the potential counterparty is in bankruptcy, like Priva, an investor or group of investors might seek to provide the debtor company debtor-in-possession financing.  “DIP” financing arrangements frequently include priming liens that, as the name indicates, prime pre-bankruptcy secured lenders’ liens over the debtor’s assets during the bankruptcy case.  DIP lenders can negotiate for post-bankruptcy rights in, or even purchase of, the debtor company through the bankruptcy plan.  With their money on the line during the reorganization, DIP lenders’ say and approval are typically influential during the bankruptcy process.  Alternatively, an investor could negotiate with the debtor and its secured lenders to purchase IP or other assets free and clear of liens from the bankruptcy estate.

To avoid assuming risks beyond the startup success rate, before taking a financial stake in (possibly) the next big thing, investors should arm themselves with information, obtain legal advice, and be prepared to negotiate an interest on favorable terms.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.