September 2017: Bankruptcy & Restructuring Litigation Update

by Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP

Ninth Circuit Holds That a Shareholder Can Be Liable for an Actual Fraudulent Transfer When Its Wholly-Owned Corporation Transfers Assets Even Absent a Showing of Alter Ego. On July 11, 2017, the Ninth Circuit in DZ Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaft Bank v. Meyer, No. 15-35086, 2017 WL 2954611 (9th Cir. Jul. 11, 2017), issued a short but nonetheless important decision concerning shareholder liability for fraudulent transfers when wholly-owned subsidiaries transfer assets. The decision not only finds liability at the shareholder level, but also holds that a shareholder can be liable even without a showing of alter ego or the shareholder holding legal title to the assets. DZ Bank will likely embolden creditors and bankruptcy estates to challenge a wider array of fraudulent transfers and should give pause to companies (and their directors and officers) facing insolvency on structuring asset transfers at subsidiaries that they control.

In DZ Bank, two individuals (a husband and wife) owed a lender approximately $1.73 million evidenced by a promissory note. Prior to defaulting on the note, the individuals “executed an elaborate series of transfers and sales to place their assets beyond the reach of their creditors.” 2017 WL 2954611 at *1. These transfers and sales all were undertaken by subsidiaries wholly-owned by one of the individuals. Specifically, a wholly-owned insurance company transferred assets, valued at $123,000, to another company the individual owned. That second company, which then held $385,000 in assets, transferred all of its assets to a third company under the individual’s control, for no consideration. That third company then “agreed to pay the $385,000 back to Meyer, personally, over time.” Id. The opinion does not identify any facts regarding this third company, including whether it had the ability to perform on the agreement to pay the $385,000 to the individual.
The individuals then filed for personal bankruptcy. The lender asserted that the $385,000 transferred out of the second company to the third company was actually fraudulent pursuant to the State of Washington’s version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and, as a result, the debt owed to the lender was not dischargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A). Id.

The bankruptcy court found for the lender, but only to the extent of the $123,000 that was first transferred because that was the amount traceable to the lender’s security interests. The district court affirmed, but on different grounds: that the lender could only avoid transfers of assets titled in the individual’s name. Since the assets were legally titled in the second company’s name, and the lender had not alleged alter ego, the lender could not recover the full amount transferred.

The Ninth Circuit reversed on all grounds, concluding that the entire $385,000 was subject to avoidance as an actual fraudulent transfer. The court stated: “If [the second company] had retained the $385,000 in assets, DZ Bank would have been able to enforce any judgment against the Meyers, prior to their filing for bankruptcy protection, by executing against Louis Meyer’s 100% ownership interest in the [second company] to satisfy $385,000 of its claim.” Id. at *2. The court continued, “His shares [in the second company] became worthless as a result of his actions as [the second company’s] sole owner and shareholder, while, even after filing for bankruptcy, he continued to receive payments from [the third company].” Id.

DZ Bank stands for three important legal principles, at least one of which may go beyond any existing federal court precedent. First, a debtor makes a fraudulent transfer even if it does not transfer assets titled in the debtor’s name, as long as the debtor indirectly owns the asset. See id.

Second, DZ Bank extended its first principle to the circumstance where a debtor’s wholly-owned subsidiary is transferring the assets the subsidiary clearly owns, which may be the first circuit-level authority so holding. For support, the Ninth Circuit cited with favor three cases, Wiand v. Lee, 753 F.3d 1194 (11th Cir. 2014), Reilly v. Antonello, 852 N.W.2d 694 (Minn. App. Ct. 2014), and In re Nickerson, 2014 WL 6686524 (Bankr. D.S.D. Nov. 25, 2014). Wiand concerned a SEC receiver appointed for several corporations seeking to recover false profits an investor received in a Ponzi scheme; in Wiand the transfers were made by corporations to the Ponzi scheme orchestrator, who then made transfers to investors. The Eleventh Circuit held that the element of “a conveyance of property which could have been applicable to the payment of the debt due” was “established because the funds that Nadel controlled and transferred to investors could have been applied by him to pay the debt he owed to the receivership entities as a result of his use of funds to perpetrate a Ponzi scheme. With each transfer that Nadel made, Nadel became a debtor of the receivership entities because he diverted the funds from their lawful purpose in violation of his fiduciary duties and was thus obligated to return those same funds to the entities to be used for the benefit of the investors. Therefore, with each transfer, Nadel diverted property that he controlled and that could have been applicable to the debt due, namely, the very funds being transferred.” Wiand, 753 F.3d at 1203.

Reilly and Nickerson involved a slightly different fact pattern—in each case, the debtor caused its wholly-owned subsidiary to issue more stock so as to dilute its ownership, see DZ Bank, 2017 WL 2954611 at *2, which is more closely connected to the debtor because of the debtor’s clear ownership interest in the existing stock. Thus, the Ninth Circuit arguably went further than the precedent it favorably cited to a more expansive universe of transfers. Instead of dilution of stock owned by a debtor, or transfers involving a Ponzi scheme, a subsidiary’s transfers could be avoided as actually fraudulent solely because its sole shareholder directed it.

Third, though it did not provide any specific analysis, the DZ Bank opinion unambiguously holds that there was no requirement to prove alter ego in order to avoid as an actual fraudulent transfer a transfer that was not actually made by the debtor but rather was made “indirectly” by the debtor through a corporation wholly-owned by the debtor. DZ Bank, 2017 WL 2954611 at *1 (expressly disagreeing with the district court’s holding that the UFTA required the lender to obtain a ruling that the subsidiary was the alter ego of the debtor).

DZ Bank may ultimately have limited application by covering only actual fraudulent transfer cases involving transfers by wholly-owned subsidiaries. Actual fraudulent transfers are far more difficult to establish than constructive fraudulent transfers. But the court’s holdings arguably should apply with equal force to constructive fraudulent transfers, which are much more commonly pursued in bankruptcy cases. The UFTA does not treat differently what is a transfer solely because it is an actual fraudulent transfer. If DZ Bank does extend to constructive fraudulent transfer claims, such claims do not require a showing of intentional misconduct but a showing that the debtor (not the wholly-owned subsidiary) received less than reasonably equivalent value at a time that the debtor (not the wholly-owned subsidiary) was insolvent or had less than reasonable capital to operate. Even if DZ Bank is limited to actual fraudulent transfers, the elimination of a need to show alter ego will make it easier to challenge transfers by a wholly-owned subsidiary as actual fraudulent transfers. Finally, left unanswered is whether the rulings in DZ Bank apply in a circumstance where a debtor-shareholder controls the actions of a company, but is neither an alter ego nor its sole shareholder. No doubt this is fertile ground for additional litigation.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Contact
more
less

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.