Sixth Circuit Affirms Defense Verdict In FLSA Case Involving Insurance Investigators

by BakerHostetler
Contact

Is It Time To Deep-Six The “Administration-Production” Dichotomy?

There is a very funny set of books under the title “Unuseless Japanese Inventions” by Kenji Kawakami. The books depict, in a matter-of-fact fashion, a series of pointless inventions of a type the Japanese call a “chingdogu” or “worthless tool”. The closest American analogy is a Rube Goldberg contraption, one far more complicated and likely awkward than the problem it was intended to solve. These include things like stickers depicting open eyes you can put on your eyelids while sleeping in class, or plastic protectors for your tongue so it won’t burn on soup, etc. One is a dusting device you attach to your cat so that it cleans your house as it chases mice (or in the case of my cats harasses you for tuna fish). Some might seem like a good idea of sorts until you realize that they have no practical application or simply defeat the very purpose of the task they are trying to simplify.

Years ago, the U.S. Department of Labor added what it surely thought was helpful language on the administrative exemption under the FLSA, noting that it was intended to cover employees who were helping run the business rather than “working on a manufacturing production line or selling product in a retail or service environment.” 29 C.F.R. § 541.201(a). Simple enough – the exemption covers those assisting in the servicing of the business and not actually making its product or making sales. Unfortunately, this simple language, intended as one of many tools to assist in applying this complex exemption, has become the chingdogu of wage and hour jurisprudence.

Some courts in the past seized on this language and created what they called the “administration-production dichotomy” wielding it like a claymore to find that even positions the Department of Labor described as exempt to be mere “production workers” not falling within the DOL’s definition of exempt employment. The most frequent example of this involves the insurance industry. Despite extremely clear DOL guidance that insurance claims adjusters are exempt (29 C.F.R. § 541.203(a)), “production dichotomy” arguments are a virtual staple of plaintiff claims.

Fortunately, most recent cases have limited the application of this notion and are now routinely finding that insurance claims adjusters and investigators are not production workers, as demonstrated by a recent Sixth Circuit opinion. In Foster v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Case No. 12-3107 (6th Cir. Mar. 21, 2013), the plaintiffs were 91 Special Investigation Unit investigators who challenged their exempt status based on, among other things, the administration-production dichotomy. As their title implies, it was their job to investigate potentially fraudulent insurance claims.

Now, everyone knows that insurance companies sell insurance policies. The plaintiffs, however, argued that the real “business” of insurance is “asset protection” and thus argued that any employee working to protect assets must be a non-exempt production worker. Fortunately, the trial court rejected this argument on summary judgment. It did, however, find a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiffs exercised discretion and independent judgment. The plaintiffs waived their jury demand and, following a seven-day bench trial, the district court found in the defendant’s favor.

The plaintiffs appealed on essentially two grounds. The first, as one would expect, was to argue the administration-production dichotomy. The Sixth Circuit, citing the wealth of contrary authority rejected it. Second, the plaintiffs argued that despite the district court’s findings, the plaintiffs did not exercise discretion and independent judgment. The plaintiffs were savvy enough not to argue that the findings were clearly erroneous, a difficult standard at best, but rather that the court’s findings related to tasks there did not constitute discretion as a matter of law. This argument devolved into a corollary to the administration-production dichotomy – their contention that investigatory work did not require discretion. The Sixth Circuit rejected this argument as well.

The Foster decision demonstrates two important things. First, plaintiffs are continuing to make production-dichotomy arguments despite the multiple pronouncements of several courts and will likely do so until that chingdogu tool is scrapped entirely. Second, the case demonstrates one of the perils for plaintiffs in these cases, which is that employers prevail on a significant number that are tried.

The bottom line: Another Circuit Court has rejected the administration-production dichotomy in the insurance context.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

BakerHostetler
Contact
more
less

BakerHostetler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.