Sixth Circuit Refuses to Uphold Collective Action Waiver Absent Arbitration

by BakerHostetler

My working title for this blog was “collective action grab bag,” concerning the recent Sixth Circuit case in Killion v. KeHE Distributors, LLC, Case Nos. 12-3357/4340 (6th Cir. July 31, 2014). I went with the title that seemed to be of interest to most practitioners, but the case actually touched on several issues, one of which is a bit of a sleeper.

The Killion case had a fairly straightforward fact pattern. The buyers and sellers of organic food products may not want to admit it, but like any product, they need sales and distribution networks. In Killion, the plaintiffs were part of that network for a distributor of organic and ethnic foods selling to major retailers like Meijer, Giant Eagle, Kroger, and Walmart. They were paid commission under a complex formula that took into account their stocking of shelves, store maintenance, promotional marketing in some stores, maintaining inventory, ordering, and related functions. As this listing suggests, much of their time, in fact about two-thirds of it, was spent largely on inventory rather than on the making of sales. The employer considered them exempt under the outside salesman exemption to the FLSA. [Note to PC police: don’t blame us, that’s still the name of it in the statute, see 29 U.S.C. section 213(a)(1)].

In 2012, the company laid off approximately 70 of these “sales” employees, but offered them retention agreements. Those agreements provided a $2,000 payment in exchange for their agreement to work another month, to waive any claims they might have, and not to sue on a class-wide basis. Four of the agents sued for unpaid overtime under the FLSA and, while the court ultimately permitted a collective action class to proceed, it excluded those that had signed the agreements. The plaintiffs filed an interlocutory appeal, and then filed a second appeal when the district court granted summary judgment against them.

The Sixth Circuit addressed four sets of issues.

1. Outside Sales Exemption. As to the merits, the court found a question of fact as to the application of the outside salesman and other exemptions. There was no real question that the plaintiffs spent much of their time on handling inventory, the plaintiffs were compensated heavily based on inventory related duties, and there were questions about whether the plaintiffs were really making sales to large grocers. This ruling is of interest to those in retail sales where both selling to the store and maintaining the product displays are a regular part of the employee’s duties.

2. Interlocutory Appeal. More interesting from the standpoint of this blog, the court found that it lacked jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ initial appeal from the district court’s exclusion of some members from the class at the conditional certification stage. This ruling is in accord with the Sixth Circuit’s prior decision in Comer v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 454 F.3d 544, 549 (6th Cir. 2006). This decision is not surprising. It is somewhat unusual that a plaintiff would actually try to file such an appeal since plaintiffs win a large majority of conditional certification decisions and a contrary decision would have overwhelmingly favored defendants. The court did, and correctly, find that it had jurisdiction to review that order once the case was actually over, which is what happened when the court granted summary judgment. As a practice tip, if a party wishes to challenge a conditional certification order, it may want to consider doing it explicitly as part of its post-judgment notice of appeal to avoid any question.

3. Class/collective action waiver. This part of the opinion has drawn interest, but it doesn’t say much we didn’t already know. The court addressed the issue of whether the putative class members who signed the retention agreements waived their right to participate in a collective action. The defendant noted that several courts of appeal had enforced such waivers but, as the Sixth Circuit concluded, all of those cases had involved agreements to arbitrate, and the cases all relied on authority relating to arbitration agreements. It found that while a collective action waiver has been found to be enforceable in the collective action context, it could only be so as part of an arbitration agreement. As the retention agreements had no arbitration provision, the court found, the collective action waivers were unenforceable.

4. Expert. Lastly, the court addressed the district court’s decision to exclude the plaintiffs’ “liability expert.” This expert relied on interviews of the plaintiffs and her own interpretation of the regulations to conclude that the plaintiffs were not exempt. In excluding the evidence, the district court noted that the expert’s report “reads like a legal brief.” The Sixth Circuit held that the district court properly excluded the report, citing its “recitation of legal principles”, reliance on the plaintiffs’ hearsay evidence, and its efforts to interpret the regulations’ intent. This is a significant decision for employers, who in many cases must address so-called expert testimony on issues such as the exempt status of employees.

The bottom line (sorry, this case has two): The Sixth Circuit will not enforce a collective action waiver unless it is a part of an arbitration agreement. A party cannot bolster its case by essentially having an expert adopt a brief in favor of their position.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© BakerHostetler | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


BakerHostetler on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.