Snapchat Sued in Georgia Distracted Driving Lawsuit

Alston & Bird
Contact

A recently filed Georgia lawsuit seeks to hold Snapchat liable for a high speed motor vehicle accident that allegedly occurred as a result of the at-fault motorist’s use of the social media application.

Snapchat users create multimedia messages referred to as “snaps.”  A snap is a photo or short video users capture with the Snapchat app.  The snap can then be edited to include filters and effects, text captions and drawings.  The snaps are then saved to the users’ “story” or sent directly to other users.  The filter at issue in this lawsuit – the “speed” filter – uses the phone’s GPS system to calculate the speed at which a user is moving at the time the snap is created.  The user can then add the speed reading to the photo or video from the editing screen.  The app rewards users who submit photos of their speed by giving them points or trophies for achieving certain speeds.

In the complaint filed against Snapchat and Christal McGee, plaintiffs Wentworth and Karen Maynard allege that McGee was using Snapchat while driving her car on September 10, 2015.  McGee allegedly was motivated to drive fast in order to obtain a “trophy” with the Snapchat speed filter and accelerated her vehicle in excess of 100 mph.  The complaint further alleges that because McGee was distracted by the app, she failed to notice a Mitsubishi, driven by Wentworth Maynard, pull out in front of her.  McGee allegedly struck Maynard’s vehicle while traveling 107 mph.  As a result, Maynard has allegedly suffered permanent brain damage.

The complaint also includes allegations regarding a car accident in Brazil in 2015 in which a woman documented that the cause of her wreck was her use of Snapchat’s speed filter.  Plaintiffs allege that Snapchat was, or should have been, aware of the danger caused by drivers using the speed filter while operating motor vehicles, yet did nothing to remove or change it.

The lawsuit filed by the Maynards pushes the envelope on manufacturer liability for the poor decisions of a product’s users.  Ultimately, this case will turn on whether the manufacturer of a legal and non-defective product (here, a cell phone app) should be liable to third parties who are injured as a result of the use of the app.  A Snapchat spokesperson indicated that Snapchat actively discourages the use of the speed filter while driving, displaying a “Do NOT Snap and Drive” warning message in the app itself.  Additionally, Snapchat’s terms of service states: “Do not use our services in a way that would distract you from obeying traffic or safety laws. And never put yourself or others in harm’s way just to capture a snap.”  Even without these warnings, a reasonable person knows better than to use a smartphone while driving a break-neck speeds.  In this case, the distracted driver – not the source of the distraction – is the tortfeasor.

The complaint is available here: http://www.mlnlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/maynard-v-snapchat-complaint.pdf

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Alston & Bird | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Alston & Bird
Contact
more
less

Alston & Bird on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.