Social Media Freedom of Expression Cases Pit the Public Against Public Officials

by Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact

As published in PublicCEO.com*

In perhaps the next battleground for government and education, citizens who comment on social media sites are facing off with local government officials public and school administrators who find their online expression offensive or defamatory.

A Minnesota high school senior was suspended and threatened with expulsion after he jokingly commented on a website that he had a romantic affair with a teacher at his school. The teen was asked on a website whether he had “made out” with a teacher and he posted a sarcastic response: “Actually, yeah.” The student admitted his untruthful post was a mistake and apologized to the teacher, but a furor erupted at the school and in the community, ultimately causing the teen to transfer schools. The student has filed a federal lawsuit naming the school principal and district superintendent and alleging violation of his First Amendment rights. The suit also accuses the local police chief of defamation for the chief’s statement that the student’s posting was “a crime” with potential felony charges.

In another case, a 6th grade girl posted disparaging comments on her Facebook page, neither during school hours nor from a school computer, about not liking a teacher’s aide. The student received a detention for her comments, was required to write a letter of apology and was also accused of having explicit conversations with a male classmate on Facebook. The student sued for First Amendment free speech violations and alleged that school officials interrogated her and forced her to give up her Facebook password in response to complaints of explicit Facebook exchanges. The school district has agreed to pay $70,000 to settle the case, while not admitting any wrongdoing. But the district has updated its policies regarding the search of devices and social media accounts and will exercise more caution before punishing students for their off-campus statements.

Schools are not the only place where social media and online defamation are damaging reputations and distressing public officials. Local governments are confronting the same problem. In Illinois, a man created a satirical Twitter account spoofing the Peoria mayor and portraying him as a foul-mouthed politician with a taste for alcohol, drugs and prostitutes. The mayor and the city manager demanded a police investigation into the man’s identity, subpoenaed Twitter to turn over the man’s IP address and suspend his account, and searched the house where the man lived for any electronics capable of sending the offensive tweets. In response, the man has filed a lawsuit. He claims that city officials violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights by stifling his political parody speech and conducting an unreasonable raid of his home.

In Virginia, a sheriff at a local sheriff’s office was up for re-election in 2009, when several of his employees expressed support for the sheriff’s opponent in the upcoming election by “liking” the opponent’s Facebook page, which simply involves clicking a button on the opponent’s Facebook webpage. The sheriff fired six employees for “liking” the political opponent’s Facebook page. A sheriff’s deputy led the fired employees in a lawsuit against the sheriff, but the United States District Court judge hearing the case initially found that free-speech protections do not apply where no actual statement is involved. In 2013, a decision from the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals reversed. That court found that “liking” something on a social network was the Internet equivalent of displaying a political sign in one’s front yard. Many courts now agree that clicking a button to like something is free speech and merits protection under the First Amendment.

In this emerging and murky area of the law, government and school officials may not feel able to await court decisions regarding many unanswered questions. Fortunately, there are practical tips public agencies can follow to avoid the pitfalls that these officials have encountered in the realm of social media, free expression and defamation.

  • Be willing and ready to tolerate criticism or irritating comments. To reap the benefits of social media for your agency, you also will have to learn to put up with adverse comments or critiques. Many online users understand that comments reflect the opinion of just one person and will take negative feedback with a grain of salt.
  • React positively and responsibly to false comments. Rather than immediately taking the defensive and suing in response to every false statement about your agency online, try to be constructive. Combat falsehoods with statements that will enhance constituent satisfaction and portray confidence in your services, not with lawsuits.
  • Consider if a defamation action is beneficial and be selective. Because the law favors free speech, defamation cases are hard to win with their heightened burdens of proof for plaintiffs. Truth is a defense to defamation, so be prepared for a full exploration of what the truth is. Litigation can last years and quickly drain resources, which may not be worthwhile if suing brings your agency bad publicity or gives needless attention to negative comments.
  • Utilize the administrative procedures of online media. Online and social media platforms have their own internal guidelines or rules for users. Some terms of use may allow statements that are clearly false or show animus to be taken down by administrative procedures at the host website. This technique can both remove negative content and show other users that such statements are not tolerated.

The examples in this article represent a growing national trend of social media and freedom of expression issues confronting local officials. Public officials need to take these issues seriously, particularly given the public pressure to eliminate threats and bullying online. But unfamiliarity with new technology may cause government and school officials to blow social media activity out of proportion and respond too harshly, too quickly. We expect cases like these to become increasingly prominent as the courts grapple with the limits of free speech in the online forum.

* This article first appeared on PublicCEO.com on July 29, 2014. Republished with permission.

- See more at: http://www.bbknowledge.com/ethics/social-media-freedom-of-expression-cases-pit-the-public-against-public-officials/#sthash.JTbqx2A4.dpuf

As published in PublicCEO.com*

In perhaps the next battleground for government and education, citizens who comment on social media sites are facing off with local government officials public and school administrators who find their online expression offensive or defamatory.

A Minnesota high school senior was suspended and threatened with expulsion after he jokingly commented on a website that he had a romantic affair with a teacher at his school. The teen was asked on a website whether he had “made out” with a teacher and he posted a sarcastic response: “Actually, yeah.” The student admitted his untruthful post was a mistake and apologized to the teacher, but a furor erupted at the school and in the community, ultimately causing the teen to transfer schools. The student has filed a federal lawsuit naming the school principal and district superintendent and alleging violation of his First Amendment rights. The suit also accuses the local police chief of defamation for the chief’s statement that the student’s posting was “a crime” with potential felony charges.

In another case, a 6th grade girl posted disparaging comments on her Facebook page, neither during school hours nor from a school computer, about not liking a teacher’s aide. The student received a detention for her comments, was required to write a letter of apology and was also accused of having explicit conversations with a male classmate on Facebook. The student sued for First Amendment free speech violations and alleged that school officials interrogated her and forced her to give up her Facebook password in response to complaints of explicit Facebook exchanges. The school district has agreed to pay $70,000 to settle the case, while not admitting any wrongdoing. But the district has updated its policies regarding the search of devices and social media accounts and will exercise more caution before punishing students for their off-campus statements.

Schools are not the only place where social media and online defamation are damaging reputations and distressing public officials. Local governments are confronting the same problem. In Illinois, a man created a satirical Twitter account spoofing the Peoria mayor and portraying him as a foul-mouthed politician with a taste for alcohol, drugs and prostitutes. The mayor and the city manager demanded a police investigation into the man’s identity, subpoenaed Twitter to turn over the man’s IP address and suspend his account, and searched the house where the man lived for any electronics capable of sending the offensive tweets. In response, the man has filed a lawsuit. He claims that city officials violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights by stifling his political parody speech and conducting an unreasonable raid of his home.

In Virginia, a sheriff at a local sheriff’s office was up for re-election in 2009, when several of his employees expressed support for the sheriff’s opponent in the upcoming election by “liking” the opponent’s Facebook page, which simply involves clicking a button on the opponent’s Facebook webpage. The sheriff fired six employees for “liking” the political opponent’s Facebook page. A sheriff’s deputy led the fired employees in a lawsuit against the sheriff, but the United States District Court judge hearing the case initially found that free-speech protections do not apply where no actual statement is involved. In 2013, a decision from the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals reversed. That court found that “liking” something on a social network was the Internet equivalent of displaying a political sign in one’s front yard. Many courts now agree that clicking a button to like something is free speech and merits protection under the First Amendment.

In this emerging and murky area of the law, government and school officials may not feel able to await court decisions regarding many unanswered questions. Fortunately, there are practical tips public agencies can follow to avoid the pitfalls that these officials have encountered in the realm of social media, free expression and defamation.

  • Be willing and ready to tolerate criticism or irritating comments. To reap the benefits of social media for your agency, you also will have to learn to put up with adverse comments or critiques. Many online users understand that comments reflect the opinion of just one person and will take negative feedback with a grain of salt.
  • React positively and responsibly to false comments. Rather than immediately taking the defensive and suing in response to every false statement about your agency online, try to be constructive. Combat falsehoods with statements that will enhance constituent satisfaction and portray confidence in your services, not with lawsuits.
  • Consider if a defamation action is beneficial and be selective. Because the law favors free speech, defamation cases are hard to win with their heightened burdens of proof for plaintiffs. Truth is a defense to defamation, so be prepared for a full exploration of what the truth is. Litigation can last years and quickly drain resources, which may not be worthwhile if suing brings your agency bad publicity or gives needless attention to negative comments.
  • Utilize the administrative procedures of online media. Online and social media platforms have their own internal guidelines or rules for users. Some terms of use may allow statements that are clearly false or show animus to be taken down by administrative procedures at the host website. This technique can both remove negative content and show other users that such statements are not tolerated.

The examples in this article represent a growing national trend of social media and freedom of expression issues confronting local officials. Public officials need to take these issues seriously, particularly given the public pressure to eliminate threats and bullying online. But unfamiliarity with new technology may cause government and school officials to blow social media activity out of proportion and respond too harshly, too quickly. We expect cases like these to become increasingly prominent as the courts grapple with the limits of free speech in the online forum.

* This article first appeared on PublicCEO.com on July 29, 2014. Republished with permission.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Best Best & Krieger LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Best Best & Krieger LLP
Contact
more
less

Best Best & Krieger LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.