South Carolina Ruling Raises Uncertainty Regarding Liability for Accessing Others’ Webmail Accounts Without Permission

by Moore & Van Allen PLLC

On October 10, 2012, the South Carolina Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Jennings v. Jennings.  The court was faced with the challenge of interpreting a somewhat ambiguous provision in the Stored Communications Act (the “SCA”) – a federal law enacted in the late 1980s.   The court’s opinion did little to help clarify the existing (and conflicting) interpretations of the SCA.

The Background of the Jennings Case
The Jennings case arose out of a domestic dispute in which a husband’s Yahoo webmail account was accessed without the husband’s consent.

After learning of the unauthorized email access, the husband filed suit alleging violations of various South Carolina laws and the SCA.  While the state law claims were dismissed by lower courts, the South Carolina Supreme Court was left to decide whether the unauthorized webmail access constituted a violation of the SCA.  The court – in a plurality opinion – concluded that the alleged unauthorized access of the webmail account was not a violation of the SCA.

SCA Definition of Electronic Storage
The SCA is a federal criminal statute which criminalizes unauthorized accessing of emails that are in “electronic storage”.   Private parties damaged by violations of the SCA can bring civil claims.

For purposes of  the SCA, 12 U.S.C. §2510(17) defines “electronic storage” as:

“(A) any temporary, intermediate storage of a[n]  . . . electronic communication incident to the electronic transmission thereof; and

(B) any storage of such communication by an electronic communication service [e.g., Yahoo! Mail, Microsoft Hotmail or Google Gmail] for purposes of backup protection of such communication.”

While all five of the South Carolina Supreme Court justices agreed that the emails in question were not in “electronic storage”, there were three different opinions issued by the court and each contained a different rationale.

Justice Hearn’s Opinion
Justice Hearn, joined by Justice Kittredge, noted in her opinion that in order for something to meet the statutory test for “electronic storage” it simply had to meet either the requirement of  §2510(17)(A) or  §2510(17)(B) — notwithstanding word “and” joining the two statutory provisions.

Focusing on §2510(17)(B), Justice Hearn concluded that in order for there to be email storage for backup purposes there must be at least two copies of an email in existence (and at least one copy must be left on the service provider’s system for “backup”).  Since there was no evidence that Jennings had ever copied or downloaded the emails from Yahoo’s servers prior to the unauthorized access, it appeared that the only emails in existence were the original emails on Yahoo’s servers – thus they were not stored on Yahoo’s system for “backup purposes”.

Chief Justice Toal’s Opinion
Chief Justice Toal (joined by Justice Beatty) concurred with Justice Hearn’s result but not her reasoning.  Chief Justice Toal believed that for an email to be in “electronic storage” it must meet the tests of both §2510(17)(A) and  §2510(17)(B). In her view, “electronic storage refers only to temporary storage made in the course of transmission, by an [email service provider like Yahoo], and to backups of such intermediate communications.”  Basically, if the email remains unopened on the email provider’s servers, it is in electronic storage – but once the recipient opens the email it ceases to be in electronic storage.

Justice Pleicones’ Opinion
Justice Pleicones, like Justice Hearn, concluded that §2510(17)(A) and §2510(17)(B) are independent tests for determining electronic storage.  However, Justice Pleicones’ opinion concluded that under §2510(17)(B)  the key issue was whether the emails were copies made by the email service provider for backup purposes.  Since there was no evidence Yahoo had retained the accessed emails for backup purposes, the emails were not in “electronic storage” and therefore not protected by the SCA.

What Does It Mean?
The Jennings case adds to the existing confusion regarding the reach of the Stored Communication Act.  Indeed, its result is very different from the result reached in the Ninth Circuit’s widely cited Theofel v. Farey-Jones decision.

Given the inconsistent court rulings across the United States, there will be a great incentive for plaintiffs seeking to take advantage of the SCA to find the jurisdiction that will be most favorable to their cause of action.    Internet and email service providers will also be forced to deal with continued uncertainly regarding the application and interpretation of the SCA across the Federal and state court systems.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Moore & Van Allen PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.