Stretching The FCPA: The Danger Of The Oracle Case

by Michael Volkov

oracleMy good friend and mentor, Judge Sporkin, is not shy nor bashful about his views on the FCPA.  When he heard about DOJ’s undercover sting in the Shot Show case, he scoffed, “What a mistake!  The government does not need to manufacture bribery.  There is plenty going on and they should prosecute those cases.”

His point was well taken.  His point applies equally to the SEC’s settlement with Oracle.  For some reason, the Oracle case was only briefly mentioned when the settlement was announced on August 16, 2012, but there was not a lot of discussion about the merits and impact of the case.  There should have been.  The case sets a dangerous precedent and a real stretch of the FCPA statute.

Oracle agreed to pay a $2 million penalty for violation of the books and records and internal controls requirements by its subsidiary in India.  (A copy of the SEC settlement is here).    The subsidiary structured transactions with India’s government relating to a contract that enabled the subsidiary to retain about $2 million in “side” funds, meaning unaccounted funds.  This money was eventually used to pay phony vendors in India.  The transactions were documented with fake invoices.   All of this sounds bad, except for one major point: there was no evidence of a bribe being paid to any Indian government official.

There is no question that it is not good for a company to keep inaccurate books and records or to find errors in its internal controls.  Unfortunately, no company is perfect and weaknesses in internal controls are a day-to-day problem which company auditors struggle with on a continuing basis.

It is worth remembering that the conduct occurred in India, a country which is notorious for bribery.  Nonetheless, the government’s investigation could only cite the “risk” of bribery, not evidence of any payments being made.oracle3

Judge Sporkin enjoys explaining the important of the books and records and internal controls provisions of the FCPA.  As the SEC enforcement director, Judge Sporkin thought the books and records requirement of the FCPA was the most important enforcement tool because it would prevent companies from engaging in bribery and accurately entering such expenditures on their books.

I do not think Judge Sporkin would agree that the FCPA’s books and records requirement was intended to make sure that companies do not make mistakes on their books.  The books and records requirement is inextricable linked to bribery not accurate bookkeeping.  In the Oracle case, the government can only cite the increased “risk” of illegal use of the unbooked funds.  Is that really enough for a government enforcement action and a $2 million penalty.

imagesCAGTYZ5ZThe danger of the Oracle precedent is that it gives the government a great bootstrapping argument.  In any case where the government finds that a company fails to accurately maintain its books or where unauthorized payments are made, the government can use the FCPA statute to force a company to pay a penalty.  That gives too much discretion to the government.

The government can rely on the Oracle precedent as a backstop for every investigation — if the government cannot prove bribery then they need only show that there is a “risk” of bribery.

Judge Sporkin’s admonition on government excess is right – there is plenty of bribery occurring around the world.  The government needs to focus on bribes and use its resources wisely.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Michael Volkov, The Volkov Law Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Michael Volkov

The Volkov Law Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.