Successor Liability – Not Your Problem, Or Is It?

by McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC


[author: Timothy R. Deckert]


When negotiating the sale of a business, tax considerations typically drive the structure of the sale. After taxes, however, liability issues are one of the most significant factors in how a deal is structured. From a liability perspective, a buyer prefers to acquire assets, which allows it to assume only certain negotiated liabilities, while the seller would rather sell the company as a whole (i.e., stock or LLC membership interests), which would saddle the buyer with all liabilities that are associated with the selling entity. While the buyer can protect itself in a stock purchase through indemnification provisions, escrowed funds and other techniques, there are limits (particularly time limits) to those types of defenses, which is why an asset sale is generally preferable for a buyer.


The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of successor liability in the case of Fizzano Bros. Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, Inc., 42 A.3d 951 (Pa. 2012). In this case, the Court noted the following five exceptions to the general rule that a purchaser of assets is not responsible for liabilities of a seller:  1) the liabilities are expressly or implicitly assumed, 2) the transaction constitutes a de facto merger (i.e., a transaction that is not legally structured as a merger, but the end result is the same), 3) the purchaser is merely a continuation of the selling entity, 4) the transaction is a fraudulent attempt to escape liability, and 5) there is inadequate consideration and no provisions are made for the creditors of the selling entity.


The Fizzano case focused on the application of the de facto merger test. A software company, System Development Group, Inc. (“SDG”), sold its stock to XLN, Inc. (“XLN”), with the bulk of the consideration consisting of two promissory notes. The two majority shareholders of SDG (the “Shareholders”), who together were entitled to approximately eighty-five percent of the promissory note payments, were employed by XLN and retained the ownership of the software (which was licensed to XLN) until the promissory notes were paid in full by XLN. Subsequently, XLN sold substantially all of its assets, including the right to license the software owned by the Shareholders, to XLNT, Inc. (“XLNT”), which also employed the Shareholders and maintained the same business location. The dispute in Fizzano stemmed from a lawsuit filed against XLN for breach of contract by SDG (XLN was responsible for this breach of contract claim due to the stock acquisition). While XLNT only acquired the assets of XLN, the plaintiff asserted that XLNT was liable under the de facto merger exception.


The trial court examined each of the following factors of the de facto merger exception, before ultimately determining that XLNT was in fact liable:  1) continuity of the enterprise (i.e., management, personnel, physical location, assets and general business operations); 2) continuity of ownership; 3) cessation of selling corporation’s business as soon as practically possible; and 4) purchaser’s assumption of the obligations ordinarily necessary for the uninterrupted continuation of the normal business operations of the seller. The trial court determined that three of the four factors were present, and held XLNT liable even though the continuity of ownership element was not met. On review, the Superior Court reversed the trial court ruling, holding in part that continuity of ownership was “indispensable” in order to establish a de facto merger.


In reviewing the de facto merger exception, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court considered a number of different issues. First, the Court noted that other jurisdictions were split on the question. The Court acknowledged that the cases where the continuity of ownership requirement had been relaxed typically involved criminal or tort law, or some other “overarching matter of public policy”, as opposed to the contractual/corporate law dispute that arose in Fizzano (the thought process being that in more “serious” cases, it is appropriate to lower the threshold for finding a purchaser liable). The Court was swayed in particular by the statutory merger language contained in Pennsylvania’s Business Corporation Law of 1988. Specifically, the Court noted that in several places, the statutes referred to an exchange of shares/securities or obligations. Focusing on the “or obligations” language, the Court concluded that since a statutory merger does not always require an exchange of shares, it did not make sense to create a broad rule that a de facto merger always have a continuity of ownership interest.


Ultimately, the Supreme Court reversed the Superior Court ruling, but declined to adopt a broad ruling. Instead, the Court limited its holding to cases involving breach of contract and express warranty. The Court did hold that the de facto merger exception requires “‘some sort of’ proof of continuity of ownership or stockholder interest.” While the Shareholders received promissory notes from XLNT (which were renegotiated from the promissory notes issued by XLN as part of the initial stock acquisition of SDG), the Court did not make a determination as to whether these notes constituted a sufficient continuity of ownership; instead, the case was remanded for further proceedings to make that determination.


While the threat of successor liability may not be present in many legitimate business transactions, the Supreme Court’s holding in Fizzano does underscore the importance of heightened awareness in structuring transactions. With some careful planning, the risk can be further reduced or outright eliminated.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC

McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.