Supreme Court Corner: Q3 2016

by DLA Piper
Contact

DLA Piper

CASES WE ARE WATCHING

 Lee v. Tam
TRADEMARK – Cert. Pending 

Pro-Football, Inc. v. Amanda Blackhorse, et al.
TRADEMARK – Cert. Pending

ISSUE: Whether the Lanham Act’s disparagement clause violates the First Amendment or is impermissibly vague.

Simon Shiao Tam leads a dance-rock band and sought to trademark the band’s name: The Slants. The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) upheld the PTO’s decision not to register the mark under § 2(a) because the mark disparages a substantial composite of an identifiable group of people − persons of Asian ancestry. A Federal Circuit panel affirmed, finding the PTO’s refusal to register the mark did not abridge Tam’s First Amendment right to free expression. An en banc Federal Circuit, however, found § 2(a) is facially unconstitutional and vacated the TTAB’s decision. The Court saw the disparagement clause as a viewpoint-based restriction on speech, reviewed the statute with strict scrutiny, and found it invalid.

The Solicitor General, on behalf of PTO Director Michelle Lee, has appealed the en banc decision. The petitioner argues the disparagement clause does not restrict free speech and establishes lawful eligibility for federal trademark registration. Moreover, even if the PTO refuses to register Tam’s mark, the Lanham Act offers Tam certain remedies to protect his band’s name from misappropriation or misuse. Tam contends his mark is not disparaging because the term is not used as a slur, but as a “badge of pride.” He further argues the disparagement clause violates the First Amendment by restraining free speech and is unconstitutionally vague because of the subjectivity in deciding whether a term is disparaging.

Relatedly, in July 2015, the Eastern District of Virginia upheld the TTAB's cancellation of six trademark registrations owned by Pro-Football, Inc. (PFI), proprietor of the Washington Redskins NFL franchise.* The registrations were canceled based on claims that the REDSKINS trademarks “may disparage” a substantial composite of Native Americans. PFI appealed the decision to the Fourth Circuit, and while pending, PFI also filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court contending that its appeal should be heard by the Supreme Court with Lee v. Tam.

SCA Hygiene Products AB v. First Quality Baby Products LLC
PATENT – ARGUMENT: NOVEMBER 1, 2016

ISSUE: Whether the equitable defense of laches may bar a claim for monetary remedies for patent infringement.

Laches is an equitable defense that can bar equitable remedies when a plaintiff has unreasonably delayed filing suit, thereby prejudicing the defendant. It has been applied to the availability of monetary remedies in patent infringement cases. Sections 282 and 286 of the Patent Act enumerate specific defenses to a patent infringement action and set forth a statutory limitation period of six years for monetary remedies, respectively.

Sitting en banc, a 6-5 majority of the Federal Circuit found that the sections do not bar the application of laches in patent cases. Following A.C. Aukerman Co. v. R.L. Chaides Constr. Co. (Fed. Cir. 1992) (en banc), the court found § 282’s broad language and its legislative history support the inclusion of laches as a bar to legal damages (i.e., monetary remedies) under the Patent Act in the absence of express congressional intent to the contrary.

This decision came on the heels of the Supreme Court’s May 2014 decision in Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.,** which reached the opposite conclusion under the Copyright Act. Petrella held that laches cannot bar legal relief because the Copyright Act includes a three-year limitation period on damages. On the other hand, laches may be available to bar an equitable remedy, such as an injunction.

Petitioner SCA Hygiene Products argues Petrella is applicable in the patent context and the Patent Act’s six-year statutory limitation period renders laches unavailable as a bar to legal damages. Respondent First Quality Baby Products argues the Federal Circuit correctly found that Congress codified the laches defense in the broad language of § 282 and that Petrella is not dispositive in the patent context.

[View source.]

*For more, see our Q3 2015 Supreme Court Corner.

**For more, see our Q2 2014 Supreme Court Corner.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper
Contact
more
less

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.