Supreme Court Decides Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Contact

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

On April 21, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, No. 20-1472, holding that the 30-day period to petition for review of an IRS Independent Office of Appeals’ decision is a nonjurisdictional deadline subject to equitable tolling.

The IRS assessed tax penalties against Boechler, P.C., a North Dakota law firm, and proposed to collect them through a levy on Boechler’s property. Thirty-one days after the IRS’s Independent Office of Appeals upheld the levy, Boechler petitioned for review by the Tax Court. The Tax Court dismissed Boechler’s petition because 26 U.S.C. § 6330(d) required it to be filed within 30 days. The Eighth Circuit affirmed, finding that the “filing deadline is jurisdictional and thus cannot be equitably tolled.”

The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the 30-day time limit to petition the Tax Court “is an ordinary, nonjurisdictional deadline subject to equitable tolling.” The Court explained that there are many “nonjurisdictional rules” that “‘promote the orderly progress of litigation’ but do not bear on a court’s power.” For the “jurisdictional label” to apply, Congress must “clearly state” that a rule is intended to be jurisdictional. The statute does not say that as to the 30-day deadline. Although the statute does refer to the Tax Court’s authority over other kinds of proceedings, the Court stated that a statutory provision “does not become jurisdictional simply because it is placed in a section of a statute that also contains jurisdictional provisions.”

The Court further held that, as a nonjurisdictional deadline, the 30-day deadline is subject to equitable tolling because “6330(d)(1) does not expressly prohibit equitable tolling, and its short, 30-day time limit is directed at the taxpayer, not the court.” The Court remanded for a determination of whether Boechler is entitled to equitable tolling in this case.

Justice Barrett delivered the unanimous opinion of the Court.

DOWNLOAD OPINION OF THE COURT

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Contact
more
less

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide