Supreme Court of Canada decision broadens scope of human rights protection in employment

by DLA Piper

DLA Piper

In a landmark decision released on December 15, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada determined that the British Columbia Human Rights Code protects individuals from discriminatory conduct perpetrated by employers with whom they have no employment relationship, so long as the discriminatory conduct has a “sufficient nexus with the employment context”. The decision is particularly important to multi-employer workplaces, such as construction sites and other workplaces that have a mix of contractors and employees.

This decision by the Supreme Court of Canada overturned the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s 2016 decision concerning this matter. The Court of Appeal had determined that the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) did not have jurisdiction over the complaint because the complainant was not an employee of the corporate respondent.

Court of Appeal disagrees with Human Rights Tribunal

The complainant, Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul, worked for Omega and Associates Engineering Ltd. (“Omega”) as a civil engineer on a road improvement project. In that capacity, he supervised work of a construction contractor, Clemas Construction Ltd. (“Clemas”), where the respondent Mr. Schrenk worked as a foreman. While working on the project, Mr. Schrenk made derogatory statements to Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul and others with respect to Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul’s place of origin, religion, and sexual orientation and sent derogatory emails to Mr. Mashgoul. Omega complained to Clemas, and Clemas terminated Mr. Schrenk’s employment.

Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul filed a complaint with the Tribunal alleging discrimination with respect to employment committed by Mr. Schrenk. Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul also alleged that Mr. Schrenk’s conduct was permitted or tolerated by Clemas and the owner of the project.

Mr. Schrenk and Clemas brought an application to dismiss Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul’s human rights complaint pursuant to s. 27(1) of the British Columbia Human Rights Code (the “Code”) on the basis that the complaint was not within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Mr. Schrenk submitted that the alleged conduct did not constitute discrimination “regarding employment” within the meaning of s. 13(1) of the Code because Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul was not in an employment relationship with Mr. Schrenk or with Clemas.

The Tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to deal with the complaint and, accordingly, it denied Mr. Schrenk’s and Clemas’ application under s. 27(1)(a) of the Code. The British Columbia Supreme Court dismissed Mr. Schrenk’s application for judicial review, but the British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed Mr. Schrenk’s appeal and found that the Tribunal erred in law by concluding that it had jurisdiction over the complaint.

The Court of Appeal agreed with Mr. Schrenk’s argument that his conduct could not amount to discrimination under the Code, as he had no authority to impose the conduct on the complainant as a condition of the complainant’s employment. In order for the complaint to be within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, the discrimination would have to have been discrimination regarding employment. In this case, the Court of Appeal held that the discrimination could not have been said to have been regarding employment because Mr. Schrenk had no authority over Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul and therefore could not negatively affect Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul’s employment and ultimately Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul’s ability to support himself financially through his work.

According to the Court of Appeal, the Tribunal did “not have jurisdiction to address a complaint made against one who is rude, insulting or insufferable but who is not in a position to force the complainant to endure that conduct as a condition of his employment” (Schrenk v. British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal, 2016 BCCA 146 at para. 44).

Supreme Court of Canada extends protection of Human Rights Code

The Supreme Court of Canada, in a 6-3 majority decision, overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision and held that Mr. Sheikhzadeh-Mashgoul’s complaint was properly within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal pursuant to s. 13(1)(b) of the Code (British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal v. Schrenk, 2017 SCC 62 at para. 3):

“The scope of section 13(1)(b) of the Code is not limited to protecting employees solely from discriminatory harassment by their superiors in the workplace. Reading the Code in line with the modern principle of statutory interpretation and the particular rules that apply to the interpretation of human rights legislation, s. 13(1)(b) prohibits discrimination against employees whenever that discrimination has a sufficient nexus with the employment context. This may include discrimination by their co‑workers, even when those co‑workers have a different employer.”

In determining whether the discrimination has a sufficient nexus with the employment context, a contextual analysis focusing on the following (non-exhaustive) factors should be performed:

  • Whether the respondent was integral to the complainant’s workplace;
  • Whether the impugned conduct occurred in the complainant’s workplace; and
  • Whether the complainant’s work performance or work environment was negatively affected.

The Supreme Court of Canada further reasoned that the use of “person” rather than “employer” in s. 13(1)(b) of the Code served to extend the Code’s protection beyond situations where the perpetrator has express authority over the terms and conditions of the complainant’s employment.

The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Schrenk is an important one for contractors and employers in British Columbia and in provinces which have human rights legislation containing provisions similar to those found in the Code. It will remain to be seen whether Schrenk is applicable in provinces with human rights legislation that expressly prohibits discrimination by “employers”.

Schrenk may have far reaching impacts on the liability of employers by permitting individuals to proceed with human rights complaints alleging discrimination in employment even against individuals and organizations with whom they work with but have no actual employment relationship.

Employers should be aware that their obligations toward preventing discriminatory conduct in the workplace extend not only to their employees, but also to individuals in the work environment with whom they have no employment relationship. If employers fail to fulfil these obligations, they could find themselves named in a potential human rights complaint.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

DLA Piper

DLA Piper on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.