Supreme Court Overturns Long-Standing Per Se Rule Against Vertical Minimum Price-Fixing

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

This morning, the Supreme Court overturned its long-standing per se rule against vertical minimum

price-fixing and held that such agreements shall be evaluated under the more flexible “rule of

reason.” See Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc., Case No. 06-480. The Court’s 5-4 decision, authored by Justice Kennedy, overturns the per se rule against vertical minimum pricefixing first announced by Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. in 1911.

In overturning Dr. Miles, the Court concluded that application of the per se rule to vertical agreements on price is inconsistent with modern antitrust and economic analysis. Under the new rule announced by the Court, vertical minimum price-fixing agreements will be evaluated under the 'rule of reason,' which takes into account market dynamics and weighs the anticompetitive effects of

a practice against its procompetitive benefits.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide