Supreme Court to Address Standard of Removal Under the Class Action Fairness Act

by Nelson Brown & Co.

Last year in Standard Fire v. Knowles, 133 S. Ct. 1345 (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court held that class action plaintiffs could not avoid removal to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) by stipulating in their complaint to damages below CAFA’s $5 million dollar threshold. The Court’s holding in Standard Fire signals a trend towards a liberal interpretation of CAFA’s amount in controversy requirement. The opinion also draws more attention to the circuit court split on the question of what defendants must do to satisfy CAFA’s removal requirements. Recently, the Court granted certiorari in a Tenth Circuit case (Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co., LLC v. Owens, 730 F.3d 1234 (10th Cir. 2013)) that will provide an opportunity to resolve that split.

CAFA’s Removal Requirements

CAFA, enacted in part to discourage forum shopping on the part of plaintiffs, grants federal district courts jurisdiction over class action suits if: (1) minimum diversity of citizenship exists among the parties; (2) a class size of at least 100 people exists; and (3) the amount in controversy is at least $5 million. If a case satisfies these criteria, a defendant may remove from state court to federal court by filing a notice of removal with the appropriate district court. The notice must state that the jurisdictional requirements of CAFA are met, and summary judgment-type evidence may be submitted in support. As discussed in past issues of Class Action Quarterly, the amount in controversy requirement of CAFA has been, and continues to be, an issue of focus in many district and circuit court opinions.

The Supreme Court’s recent decision to grant certiorari in Dart Cherokee signals its willingness to again weigh in on CAFA’s standards and – hopefully – sheds light on defendants’ pleading burdens going forward.

Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Company, LLC v. Owens

In Dart Cherokee, the Tenth Circuit denied the defendants’ motion for appellate review of the lower court’s order to remand the case to state court. The district court order and subsequent denial of review shows that a minority of courts still take a stringent approach in evaluating whether defendants have satisfied their burden of proof at removal.

The plaintiff in Dart Cherokee filed a putative class action in Kansas state court, seeking royalties from oil and gas wells operated by the defendants. The defendants removed to federal court, estimating the amount in controversy at more than $11 million. The District Court for the District of Kansas granted the plaintiff’s subsequent motion to remand, finding that the defendants failed to present sufficient evidence at removal to establish federal jurisdiction.

Significantly, the court found that presenting evidence in a brief opposing remand was not enough; the defendant should have presented that evidence at the time of removal. In a split decision, the full panel of the Tenth Circuit denied the defendants’ motion for rehearing. The denial of appellate review implies that the Tenth Circuit will take a stringent approach to evaluating whether class action defendants have presented enough evidence at the time of removal to meet CAFA’s $5 million requirement. In light of the court’s ruling, removing defendants may be placed in the unfortunate position of having to provide all evidence in support of their amount in controversy calculation with their notices of removal, or risk the court refusing to consider that evidence when plaintiffs move to remand to state court. The Tenth Circuit’s position, and its divergence from the majority of circuit courts that have considered the issue, may also create the potential for forum shopping by plaintiffs seeking to hold defendants to a higher removal burden.

Supreme Court Grants Certiorari

The Supreme Court’s granting of certiorari in a case the Tenth Circuit refused to hear indicates the Court’s readiness to again delve into the amount in controversy requirement of CAFA. The Court’s willingness to address the issue again shortly after Standard Fire signals the pressing need for clarity with respect to removal under CAFA, particularly in light of the sheer volume of varied district and circuit court opinions interpreting the amount in controversy requirement. The case is expected to be heard by the Supreme Court in its next term.

The question of what defendants must do to satisfy the amount in controversy requirement for removal under CAFA is an evolving issue. The Supreme Court needs to provide guidance on these issues. A ruling in Dart Cherokee will hopefully provide a uniform standard that removing defendants must meet in establishing the $5 million amount in controversy. Regardless of which way the Court rules, parties will benefit from transparency and predictability on the issue.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nelson Brown & Co. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Nelson Brown & Co.

Nelson Brown & Co. on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.