TC's inside IP - Summer 2013: Supreme Court Establishes International Copyright Exhaustion - But What About Patents?

by Thompson Coburn LLP
Contact

In a much anticipated case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on March 19, 2013 in Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons that the “first sale” or “exhaustion” doctrine of U.S. Copyright law, which allows resale of copyrighted materials, applies even in the case of goods manufactured and sold abroad. Thus, the decision effectively establishes international copyright exhaustion.

 

Specifically, Supap Kirtsaeng arbitraged textbooks by purchasing them in Thailand at low cost and reselling them in the United States at a profit. John Wiley & Sons, a textbook publisher, brought suit against Kirtsaeng based on § 602(a)(1) of the Copyright Act, which prohibits importation of a copyrighted work into the United States without permission from the copyright owner. In defense, Kirtsaeng claimed that these were allowable re-sales under the first sale doctrine, which is codified in § 109(a) of the Copyright Act. Under § 109(a), “the owner of a particular copy” of a copyrighted work “lawfully made under this title,” i.e., the Copyright Act, can lawfully “sell or otherwise dispose” of his or her copy without permission from the copyright owner. As a result, the Court had to decide whether copyrighted works manufactured overseas are “lawfully made under this title.”

 

In a 6-3 decision, the Court rejected arguments that “lawfully made under this title” in § 109(a) imposed any geographical limitation—thus finding that Kirtsaeng was protected by the “first sale” or “exhaustion” doctrine. Among other reasons, the Court found that the language of § 109(a) itself supported Kirtsaeng because it said nothing about geography but simply applied to works made “in compliance with” the Copyright Act. The Court also examined and criticized the Ninth Circuit’s hybrid-geographical interpretation under which the “first sale” doctrine applies to (1) copies manufactured in the United States and (2) copies manufactured abroad but first sold in the United States with the American copyright owner’s permission. While the Court understood the second portion of the Ninth Circuit’s test from a public policy standpoint, it found that such a “half-geographical/half-nongeographical interpretation” could not be reconciled with the language of the statute.

 

The Court also held that while the first sale doctrine is statutory, it is a codification of the common law. And according to the Supreme Court, the common law had long recognized exhaustion without any geographical distinctions, citing back to Lord Coke’s Institutes of the Laws of England from the seventeenth century. Further, the Court found that many “ordinary scholarly, artistic, commercial and consumer activities” would be threatened if the import ban trumped resale permission. Under this analysis, libraries, museums, used booksellers, and sellers of goods that included embedded software would have to get special permissions, or cease their activities, if special copyright permissions were needed to sell imported works. Accordingly, the court held that “lawfully made under this title” does not impose geographical limitations, and thus effectively recognized international copyright exhaustion.

 

One issue to be seen is what effect this decision will have on U.S. patent law, which has a related “first sale” or “exhaustion” doctrine. While the Supreme Court has now found in favor of international exhaustion in the copyright context, appellate court decisions at the Federal Circuit have rejected international patent exhaustion – i.e., holding that the first sale doctrine does not apply in the patent context to goods manufactured and sold overseas.


Arguments can now be made that the Federal Circuit’s cases are of questionable precedential value in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Kirtsaeng. As discussed above, the Supreme Court found that it could find no support in the common law for making geographical distinctions in applying the first sale doctrine. Thus, it is unclear why the law would be different for patents, particularly considering that the common law still governs in the patent context and has not been codified like it has for copyrights.

 

Interestingly, the defendant in Ninestar Tech. v. ITC petitioned the Supreme Court for writ of certiorari on this very issue. After the decision in Kirtsaeng, it was expected by some commentators that the Supreme Court would issue a GVR order – granting the petition, vacating the judgment below, and remanding for reconsideration in light of Kirtsaeng. Instead, the Supreme Court simply denied the petition.

 

While one may be tempted to read this as a sign that Kirtsaeng is limited to the copyright context, reading the tea leaves at the Supreme Court is a risky proposition. For example, it may simply be that the Supreme Court did not think Ninestar was a suitable vehicle to decide the issue. In fact, the government argued this “unsuitability” position in opposing Ninestar’s petition. According to the government’s opposition, Ninestar didn’t simply import like Kirtsaeng but instead additionally reconstructed the article, which is in itself infringing under patent doctrine. Under this analysis, even if international patent exhaustion applies, Ninestar still infringed, and it could not argue otherwise because it had waived any argument that its acts were permissible repair by not raising the issue below. Moreover, Ninestar’s petition was procedurally problematic because it had previously been civilly fined for violating a cease-and-desist order by the International Trade Commission, and the Supreme Court already denied certiorari on that issue. According to the government, granting certiorari based on Ninestar’s previous petition could have resulted in an impermissible collateral attack.

 

For now, we will have to wait for the next case for greater certainty about international patent exhaustion.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Thompson Coburn LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Thompson Coburn LLP
Contact
more
less

Thompson Coburn LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.