Telecommuting: A New Trend of Reasonable Accommodation?

by Baker Donelson

Technology has transformed the workplace in almost every industry. The use of cellphones, laptops, tablets, videoconferencing and other electronic media has, in many cases, torn down the walls of traditional offices, and opened up a world where business can be conducted virtually anywhere at any time. While the conveniences created by technology have allowed businesses to grow and expand, advances in technology also keep employers on their toes, trying to navigate the sometimes murky waters of employment law.

On April 22, 2014, the U.S. Sixth Circuit issued an opinion in EEOC v. Ford Motor Co. (6th Cir. No. 12-2484), which highlights the ways in which technology has transformed the workforce to such a degree that being physically present in the workplace may no longer be necessary to meet the essential functions of the job. The ADA requires that all employers with 15 or more employees provide reasonable accommodation to qualified employees with disabilities in order to allow them to perform the essential functions of their jobs. In Ford Motor Co., the issue was whether telecommuting four days a week was a reasonable accommodation for a Ford employee's irritable bowel syndrome. Ford argued that the employee could not meet the essential functions of her job as a resale buyer working from home, as those essential functions included interacting in person with her resale team, suppliers and others. The EEOC argued that if "physical presence" were eliminated as a job requirement, the employee would undoubtedly be qualified because of her prior positive performance reviews, and that working from home would provide a reasonable accommodation for her to perform satisfactorily in the position.

The district court agreed with Ford and ruled that the EEOC could not show that the employee was a "qualified" individual with a disability because the proposed accommodation wouldn't allow her to perform the essential functions of her job, including collaboration with her workplace team for which physical presence in the office was a necessity. However, the Sixth Circuit reversed, holding that Ford could not meet its burden of showing that physical presence at the workplace was an "essential function" of the employee's resale buyer position.  While the court agreed that for many positions, "regular attendance at the workplace is undoubtedly essential," the court distinguished a line of preceding cases decided between 1998 and 2012 by acknowledging that as a result of technology, "workplace" may no longer be the "physical worksite provided by the employer." The court further noted that "as technology has advanced in the intervening decades, and an ever greater number of employers and employees utilize remote work arrangements, attendance at the workplace can no longer be assumed to mean attendance at the employer's physical location." The court ultimately concluded that determining whether physical presence at the Ford facility was truly essential to the employee's job was a "highly fact specific" question, and the court would look to the following for guidance:

  1. the written job description;
  2. the business judgment of the employer;
  3. the amount of time spent performing the function; and
  4. the work experience of past and present employees in the same or similar positions.

The court then distinguished the Ford employee's position, where she already conducted the vast majority of her communications with internal and external stakeholders via conference call, from positions where employees are actually required to interact face-to-face with clients, including cases that  concluded a custodian must attend his physical workplace to complete the required manual labor, and that "onsite" attendance was an essential function of the job for a neo-natal nurse who provided direct patient care. The court was "not persuaded that positions that require a great deal of teamwork are inherently unsuitable to telecommuting arrangements," especially because we now have available "teleconferencing technologies that most people could not have conceived of in the 1990s."

Under this reasoning, could any position with no direct customer/client interaction or manual labor be suitable for telecommuting to some degree or another as an accommodation? As with most tough questions about the law, the answer is: "It depends." While employers must accommodate individuals if the accommodation is "reasonable," employers need not accommodate individuals if such an accommodation would amount to an "undue hardship" for the employer. Determining what is reasonable versus what will constitute an undue hardship can be tricky, as it inherently involves a case by case analysis.

In order to be prepared to handle a request for telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation, employers should be mindful to have detailed job descriptions that explain the essential functions of the job, including those functions that as a practical matter must be performed at the physical worksite. Other office policies, such as attendance policies, can bolster an employer's claim that employees are expected to be regularly present in person on the job. It is also important to make sure that, where appropriate, employees are treated the same. If an employer regularly allows employees in one position to work from home but then denies another individual in a similar position that opportunity, the case can more easily be made that being physically present at the worksite is not an essential function of the job and some amount of work from home would be reasonable. Finally, when an employee requests an accommodation, work with the employee one-on-one to determine what kind of accommodation might be necessary, and document the interactive process, especially where requests may be denied as unreasonable. This process can allow the employer to determine whether the employee's specific position can be accommodated with a reasonable amount of telecommuting while still meeting the needs of the employer and employee.

Finally, if employers allow telecommuting (whether as an accommodation or otherwise), a host of other employment issues may be raised, including wage and hour problems, worker's compensation/injury claims, OSHA claims, and of course, problems with productivity.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Baker Donelson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Baker Donelson

Baker Donelson on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.