The Circuit Raises A Glass To A Broad Construction Of Law Enforcement’s Authority Under The Fourth Amendment

by Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact

Yesterday the Second Circuit issued a decision in United States v. Diaz, No. 15-3776 (Walker, Sack, Chin).  In an opinion by Judge Sack, the Court addressed two questions under the Fourth Amendment:  when does a police officer have probable cause to make an arrest under an ambiguous law, and whether an officer can conduct a search incident to arrest if she only intends to issue a citation.

The facts, as found by S.D.N.Y. Judge Furman in a suppression hearing and after a bench trial, were largely undisputed:  While patrolling a private building under the “Clean Halls” program, NYPD officer Chris Aybar saw Jose Diaz sitting in a stairwell with a red plastic cup in his hand, an open bottle of vodka nearby, and the smell of alcohol in the air.  Officer Aybar intended to issue Diaz a summons for an open container violation, but first she asked Diaz to stand.  When he did so, he fumbled with the pockets of his coat and waistband, leading Officer Aybar to search him.  She patted him down, and found a loaded pistol.  After losing a motion to suppress the evidence obtained during the search, Aybar was convicted in a stipulated facts bench trial of being a previously convicted felon in possession of a firearm, and sentenced to 33 months in prison.

The Court first addressed probable cause to arrest.  Without deciding whether New York City’s open container law prohibits drinking in the hallway of a private building—an issue the New York appellate courts have not addressed—the Second Circuit held it was reasonable for Officer Aybar to believe that Diaz committed a violation, thereby rendering the search legal under the Fourth Amendment.  The City code prohibits drinking in a public place, defined to mean “[a] place to which the public or a substantial group of persons has access, including, but not limited to, any highway, street, road, sidewalk, parking area, shopping area, place of amusement, playground, park or beach.”  N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 10-125(a)(2).  Given the ambiguity in the statute and lack of guidance from the courts, even if Officer Aybar were wrong about the effect of the statute her error was an objectively reasonable mistake of law.  The Court did not even attempt to interpret the open container law itself, and noted that this is a cost of the “mistake of law” doctrine:  it lets courts avoid making difficult interpretative calls, leaving the police and the public with no guidance on what behavior is illegal.  Nevertheless, the Court applied the doctrine and held that Officer Aybar had probable cause to ticket or arrest Diaz.  Although it is frustrating for the Court to have avoided this question, it is sensible:  to paraphrase Justice Marshall, it should emphatically be the province of state court judges to say what the law of New York state is.

Next, the Court turned to the question of whether the search of Diaz was incident to an arrest since, at the time she patted him down, Officer Aybar had no intention of making an arrest.  As Diaz conceded, forty years ago in United States v. Ricard, the Second Circuit squarely held that a search incident to arrest did not require an intent to arrest.  But Diaz argued that an intervening Supreme Court decision, Knowles v. Iowa, 525 U.S. 113 (2008), had changed the law.  In Knowles, a police officer had probable cause to arrest a driver for speeding, but instead issued a citation.  After issuing the citation, the officer searched the car and discovered marijuana; only at that point did he make an arrest.  The Second Circuit distinguished Knowles because the search took place after the officer had already issued a citation and determined not to make an arrest.  In this case, by contrast, Officer Aybar searched Diaz with no plan to arrest him, but when an arrest was still a theoretical possibility.  While the Second Circuit’s interpretation of Knowles is in line with several other federal courts of appeal, it differs from the New York State Court of Appeals.  In People v. Reid, 24 N.Y. 615 (2014), the Court of Appeals held that the officer’s intent to arrest when performing the search was what mattered.  The Second Circuit, though loathe to predict how the Court of Appeals might interpret the open container law, had no trouble labeling its reading of Knowles as “mistaken.”  A wise judge who served in state and federal court once joked that the surest way to get a New York state court to reject an interpretation of law is for a federal court to adopt that interpretation.  By avoiding the state law question of the proper scope of the open container law, the Second Circuit will avoid a contrary state law ruling.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Contact
more
less

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.