The Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program: An Analysis of the SEC’s Second Annual Report, Best Practices for Dealing with Whistleblowers, and Recent Cases Interpreting the Scope of the Anti-Retaliation Provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act

by Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

[author: Raymond Banoun]

I. Introduction

On November 15, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "the Commission") issued its Second Annual Report on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program ("the Report"), covering the period between October 1, 2011, and September 30, 2012. The Report, which satisfies congressional reporting obligations found in sections 922(a) and 924(d) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. No. 111-203, §§ 922(a), 924(d), 124 Stat. 1841 (2010) ("the Dodd-Frank Act", the "Act", or "Dodd-Frank"), provides insight into the effectiveness of the Commission's whistleblower bounty program,1 the activities of the office charged with administering the program, and the Investor Protection Fund from which bounty payments are made. The issuance of the Report offers an opportunity for companies to understand the focus of the Commission's whistleblower program and to reevaluate their own compliance and internal reporting systems.

II. Highlights of the Second Annual Report

In what is perhaps the most significant development in the whistleblower program's short history, the SEC made its first award in Fiscal Year 2012. According to the Report, the whistleblower received the maximum award of 30% for helping the SEC stop an "ongoing multi-million dollar fraud."2 The Report indicates that fines in the judicial action already exceed $1 million, with further judgments and sanctions possible.3 Because the government collected approximately $150,000 by the end of the fiscal year, the SEC was able to pay nearly $50,000 to the whistleblower.4 While the percentage awarded was the maximum of 30%, the total dollar amount is relatively modest considering that most securities cases involve hundreds of millions of dollars in fines and penalties, and thus the potential remains for far greater awards than the one discussed in the Report.5 Because few details about the whistleblower, the fraudulent activity involved, or the company have been provided due to confidentiality provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act,6 the larger significance of the award is hard to ascertain.7 Interestingly, the SEC also denied another tipper in the same matter an award, reportedly because that person's information did not contribute significantly to the SEC's investigation.

As it did last year, the Report also provided information on the number of whistleblower tips, complaints, and referrals ("TCRs") made during Fiscal Year 2012. According to the Report, 3,001 TCRs were received by the SEC's Office of the Whistleblower during the reporting period.8 Nearly 50.0% of those TCRs fell within three complaint categories: Corporate Disclosures (18.2%), Offering Fraud (15.5%), and Manipulation (15.2%).9 The 3,001 TCRs came from not only the United States (including all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico), but forty-nine other countries as well.10 With respect to domestic TCRs, of which there were 2,507, nearly 50.0% came from six states: California (17.4%), Florida (8.1%), New Jersey (4.1%), New York (9.8%), Texas (6.3%), and Washington (4.1%).11 As for foreign TCRs, nearly 60.0% of the 324 came from Commonwealth countries,12 with another 8.0% from the People's Republic of China.13

Although only one award was paid out in Fiscal Year 2012, the SEC's Office of the Whistleblower posted 143 Notices of Covered Action-notices of enforcement judgments and orders that imposed monetary sanctions of $1 million or more.14 According to the Report, the Office of the Whistleblower continues to review and process applications for whistleblower awards based on those notices received during Fiscal Year 2012.15

III. Best Practices for Companies Dealing with Whistleblowers

The Report provides a reminder to public companies of the critical importance of establishing and maintaining a tailored compliance and internal reporting program. Although off-the-shelf programs may be a useful start, they are unsuitable as a final form for most public companies. Indeed, guidance from both the Department of Justice ("DOJ") and the SEC stress the importance of having a compliance program tailored to specific risks and nuances of a company and its industry.16

Companies should strive to encourage employees to report any suspected violations of law or the company's code of conduct to company compliance, internal audit, or legal personnel. Company culture-including "tone at the top"-is an important factor not only in encouraging employees to make use of internal reporting systems but also in demonstrating a commitment to compliance with the laws. Companies should ensure that employees are trained on the company's code of conduct and on the requirement to comply with applicable laws, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA").17 During the training, appropriate emphasis should be placed on encouraging employees to utilize internal reporting channels, such as hotlines, and on the importance of reporting violations of the code of conduct or laws. Such training programs are critical to reducing violations of law, to mitigating any sanctions for the company if employees violate the law,18 and to encouraging internal reporting of suspected misconduct.

A critical component of every corporate compliance program, especially now, is a formalized process to identify and promptly respond to potential violations of federal securities laws. Companies must have anonymous reporting hotlines for employees and vendors and should develop a system in which tips and complaints can be prioritized based on risk. A pre-identified outside counsel should be engaged to investigate more serious allegations such as alleged misconduct by management, violations of the FCPA, and significant accounting violations. With the potential for employees to go straight to the SEC with allegations, companies must treat every allegation seriously and promptly investigate potential violations of federal securities laws so that the company can be in a position to remediate the wrongdoing and to self-report the possible violations to the SEC and, where appropriate, to the DOJ.

Companies face additional challenges in situations where a whistleblower complaint is brought to their attention in the first instance by the SEC. In those instances, companies should recognize that the SEC Enforcement Staff nonetheless will welcome a credible and thorough internal investigation, even after having received a whistleblower tip or complaint.19

Given the Dodd-Frank Act's anti-retaliation provisions,20 companies should consider whether and to what extent they want to take steps to identify the individual who reported to the Commission. If a company has uncovered the identity of the whistleblower, then it must determine whether and to what extent it wants to keep the whistleblower informed of the status (but not the findings) of the internal investigation.

IV. Other Developments in Whistleblower Cases

Although not addressed in the Report, there have been several significant judicial developments regarding the anti-retaliation provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Dodd-Frank significantly expands protections for whistleblowers and explicitly makes it illegal for a company to retaliate in any way against a whistleblower.21 The statute also contains a private cause of action for whistleblowers alleging retaliatory discharge or other discrimination22 and provides that retaliation can be criminal.23 However, thus far, courts have applied the anti-retaliation provisions of Dodd-Frank narrowly.

In Asadi v. G.E. Energy (USA), LLC, 33 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1837, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 96929 (S.D. Tex. Jun. 28, 2012), a federal district court in Texas held that the Dodd-Frank anti-retaliation provisions do not apply extraterritorially. All the alleged retaliatory conduct against the plaintiff, including negative reviews and a demotion, took place outside of the United States, as did the conduct about which the plaintiff reported. Under those circumstances, the court held that the Dodd-Frank Act protections were inapplicable because the protections were not intended to apply outside the United States. Additionally, the court stated that the plaintiff did not have a cause of action for retaliation under Dodd-Frank because (1) he reported the alleged FCPA violations internally, but never to the SEC; and (2) his internal disclosures were not required or protected by securities laws.

In Egan v. TradingScreen, Inc., 32 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 418, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 96307 (S.D.N.Y. May 4, 2011), the court left open the possibility that internal reporting of a violation could qualify for protection under the anti-retaliation provisions, but found that the complaint as drafted did not adequately plead anti-retaliation. In Egan, the plaintiff made an internal report that the company's CEO was diverting company resources to another business that the CEO solely owned. An internal investigation supported the plaintiff's allegations. The CEO fired the plaintiff and did not provide him with the company's customary severance package. The plaintiff sued under the anti-retaliation provisions, and the defendants moved to dismiss, arguing that, because the plaintiff did not report the violations to the SEC, but rather only internally, he could not be a protected whistleblower under the statute. The court held that to have a successful claim under the anti-retaliation provisions of the whistleblower provisions of Dodd-Frank, a plaintiff must either allege that his information was reported to the SEC, or that his disclosures fell under one of the four categories of disclosures delineated by 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(A)(iii) that do not require such reporting-i.e., those under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Securities Exchange Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1513(e), or other laws and regulations subject to the jurisdiction of the SEC. The court also held that a plaintiff can invoke the anti-retaliation protections of the Dodd-Frank Act if, rather than reporting personally and directly to the SEC, he or she does so jointly with another party, such as an investigating law firm, and can establish that a report to the SEC actually was made. The court gave the plaintiff narrow leave to amend his complaint to allege that a joint report was actually made to the SEC, because it held that the plaintiff could not establish that his internal disclosures met the requisites of any of the four categories delineated under prong (iii).

In Nollner v. Southern Baptist Convention, Inc., 852 F. Supp. 2d 986 (M.D. Tenn. 2012), the court cited Egan in interpreting prong (iii) of the Dodd-Frank Act's anti-retaliation provisions to cover an employee who suffers an adverse employment action based on the employee's internal disclosure that is "required or protected" by the securities laws. In other words, an employee who reports internally, rather than directly to the Commission, may be protected under Dodd-Frank's anti-retaliation provisions so long as the employee's internal reporting is "required or protected" by the securities laws. To guide its analysis, the court identified four factors that an employee would need to prove to qualify for protection: (1) that the plaintiff was retaliated against for reporting a violation of the securities laws; (2) that the plaintiff reported that information to the SEC or to another entity, including internal reporting; (3) that the disclosure was made pursuant to a law, rule, or regulation subject to the SEC's jurisdiction; and (4) that the disclosure was "required or protected" by that law, rule, or regulation. The court ultimately denied the plaintiffs' anti-retaliation claim, holding that their internal disclosure of a potential FCPA violation was not "required or protected" by the securities laws because their employer was not an "issuer."

While companies must take care to ensure that they have thorough and clear anti-retaliation policies and guidelines regarding how to address whistleblower complaints, the cases interpreting these new provisions thus far suggest that courts will conduct thorough and searching fact-driven inquiries before allowing anti-retaliation claims to proceed.

1 For more information on the SEC's whistleblower bounty program and best practices for companies dealing with whistleblowers, please see Bradley J. Bondi, Jodi Avergun, Thomas Kuczajda & Steven D. Lofchie, Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP, "The Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Provisions: Considerations for Effectively Preparing for and Responding to Whistleblowers," Business Fraud Alert, May 26, 2011,
2 U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, Annual Report on the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower Program Fiscal Year 8 (2012) [hereinafter "Annual Report"].
3 Id.
4 Id.
5 Indeed, the amount pales in comparison to the whistleblower award of $104 million announced by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") on September 11, 2012, in connection with the government's investigation of tax evasion by a Swiss bank.  See David Kocieniewski, "Whistle-Blower Awarded $104 Million by I.R.S.," N.Y. Times, Sept. 11, 2012, available at  The whistleblower, who was involved in that offense and who served two and a half years in prison, assisted the IRS in collecting over $780 million in fines and penalties from the bank.  Id.  By contrast, the SEC's whistleblower bounty rules do not permit a whistleblower to recover a bounty where the whistleblower was convicted of a related crime.
6 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(2).
7 Annual Report at 8.
8 Id. at 4.
9  Id. at 4-5.
10 Id. at 5.  One hundred and seventy (170) TCRs received in Fiscal Year 2012, representing 5.7% of the total received, were submitted without any geographical information provided.  Annual Report at Appendix B: Whistleblower Tips Received by Location - United States and its Territories - Fiscal Year 2012.
11 Id. at Appendix B: Whistleblower Tips Received by Location - United States and its Territories - Fiscal Year 2012.
12 While the relatively high percentage of TCRs from Commonwealth countries may suggest a common culture that encourages whistleblowing activity, the number probably reflects the more mundane fact that residents of those countries are more likely to speak English, the language in which Form TCR and the Commission website are written.
13 The relatively high percentage of TCRs from China may be due to the SEC's significant focus on issuers from China, and in particular Chinese reverse merger companies listed on U.S. exchanges.  See, e.g., Press Release, U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, SEC Charges N.Y.-Based Fund Manager and Others With Securities Laws Violations Related to Chinese Reverse Merger Company (July 30, 2012), available at; Press Release, U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, SEC Charges China-Based Company and Others with Stock Manipulation (Apr. 11, 2012), available at; Press Release, U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, SEC Approves New Rules to Toughen Listing Standards for Reverse Merger Companies (Nov. 9, 2011), available at; Luis A. Aguilar, Comm'r, U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, Facilitating Real Capital Formation (Apr. 4, 2011), available at; Scott Eden, "China Reverse Mergers Continue Wild Ride," The Street, June 23, 2011,
14 Annual Report at 6, 8-9.  Individuals have ninety (90) days to apply for an award based on the posted notices of covered action.
15 Id. at 9.
16 See U.S. Dep't of Justice & U.S. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, 56-66 (2012), available at (explaining that "[w]hen it comes to compliance, there is no one-size-fits-all program"); U.S. Sentencing Comm'n, Guidelines Manual, § 8B2 (Nov. 1, 2012), available at (describing qualities of an "effective compliance and ethics program" for purposes of reducing an organization's culpability score).
17 Peter B. Clark, Bradley J. Bondi & James A. Treanor, Corruption and the Arab Spring: Compliance Implications for International Companies, FCPA Report, July 25, 2012, available at
18 Lanny Breuer, Assistant Att'y Gen., U.S. Dep't of Justice, Address at the American Conference Institute's 28th National Conference on the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (Nov. 16, 2012), available at (highlighting a financial services firm's "rigorous compliance program" as one reason why the Department of Justice declined to bring a case against the firm when its former employee conspired to circumvent its internal controls).
19 Emmanuel Olaoye, "Companies Will be Treated Favorably if They Report Violations First, SEC Enforcer Tells Lawyers," The Knowledge Effect, Oct. 24, 2012,; see also Press Release, SEC Charges Johnson & Johnson With Foreign Bribery, Apr. 7, 2011, available at (emphasizing the company's voluntary disclosures and "thorough internal investigation").
20 See 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1).  Relief for an employee who successfully brings a retaliation action could include reinstatement, two times the amount of back pay owed, including interest, and compensation for costs, expert witness fees, and reasonable attorneys' fees. 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(C).
21 Id. at § 78u-6(h)(1)(A).
22 Id. at § 78-6(h)(1)(B).
23 Under § 78u-6(h)(1)(A)(iii), an employer may not take a retaliatory action against an employee that makes a disclosure that is required or protected by 18 U.S.C. § 1513(e).  By taking such action, the employer could face fines, imprisonment, or both.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at:

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.