The Fifth Circuit Recognizes Impact of Subsequent In Rem Action on Forum Non Conveniens Analysis

by Baker Donelson

The ever-changing Fifth Circuit jurisprudence on forum non conveniens (FNC) may have taken another turn with the Fifth Circuit’s opinion in Cotemar S.A. De C.V. v. Hornbeck Offshore Servs., L.L.C., 13-20230, 2014 WL 2111190 (5th Cir. May 21, 2014), which vacated the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas’ dismissal of the appellants’ maritime tort action based on the doctrine of FNC. Although finding that the district court’s balancing of the private interest and public interest factors did not constitute an abuse of the district court’s discretion, the Fifth Circuit nevertheless remanded the case on two grounds.

First, the district court was asked to clarify its order of dismissal’s return jurisdiction clause with respect to the possibility that the appellants’ access to relief may be time-barred in the appellee’s earlier chosen forum — Mexico. As the Fifth Circuit clarified in Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, S.A. v. Schichau-Unterweser, A.G., 955 F.2d 368, 371-72 (5th Cir. 1992) and recognized in Cotemar, the availability and adequacy of the alternative forum are threshold requirements for an FNC dismissal:

When considering the threshold requirements that an alternative forum must be adequate and available, district courts are obligated to ensure that plaintiffs can reinstate suits in American courts if the defendants obstruct jurisdiction in the alternative forum. Accordingly, when a district court dismisses a case on the basis of forum non conveniens, the failure to include a return jurisdiction clause . . . constitutes per se abuse of discretion.

Cotemar, 2014 WL 2111190, at *2 (internal quotations and citations omitted). Although the district court included a return jurisdiction clause, it failed to address the parties’ evidence in the record regarding the potential untimeliness of the appellants’ claims in the Mexican forum:

Where litigation in a particular forum has become time-barred, that forum is no longer an available forum for the purposes of a forum non conveniens analysis. As we observed in Veba-Chemie A.G. v. M/V Getafix, 711 F.2d 1243, 1248 (5th Cir. 1983), it would be “exceedingly harsh” to dismiss for forum non conveniens “if no other forum is available to plaintiff at the time of dismissal” due to the expiration of a time limit in a foreign jurisdiction.

Cotemar, 2014 WL 2111190, at *2. While the Fifth Circuit acknowledged that courts may disregard this consideration if the “plaintiff’s plight is of his own making,” it found that the district court erred in failing to account for the possibility of untimeliness in its return jurisdiction clause and instructed the district court to revise its return jurisdiction clause in accordance with the Fifth Circuit’s decision in Veba-Chemie — that dismissal be conditioned on the ultimate “availability” of the more convenient forum proposed by the FNC mover. The Fifth Circuit further instructed that if access to relief in the Mexican courts has become time-barred for reasons not of the appellants’ “own making,” then the Mexican courts are no longer an available forum and the lawsuit must proceed in the United States.

More interesting was the Fifth Circuit’s second basis for remand: seizure of the alliding vessel by the appellants — after the Texas district court’s FNC order of dismissal — pursuant to a warrant of arrest issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. After recognizing that “supervening changes of circumstances” — such as the arrest of a vessel in a forum different than the purportedly more convenient one proposed by the FNC mover — must be taken into account even where they materialize during the pendency of an appeal, the Fifth Circuit concluded that remand was appropriate for a determination as to whether simultaneously pursuing an in rem action in the Eastern District of Louisiana would render litigation in Mexico less convenient based on one or more of the private interest and public interest factors.

As a side note, Judge Lemmon of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana refused to vacate the vessel arrest upon a challenge from Hornbeck that there were no reasonable grounds for the arrest and that the arrest was time-barred under the doctrine of laches. See Cotemar S.A. De Cv. v. Motor Vessel BEAUFORT, CIV.A. 14-342, 2014 WL 1330203 (E.D. La. Apr. 3, 2014). After conducting a choice of law analysis, the Court found that United States law — which provides for a lien against the vessel for damages caused by an allision — may apply, and thus reasonable grounds existed for the arrest. Further, the court refused to vacate the arrest under the doctrine of laches, because Hornbeck failed to show that any delay in the arrest of the vessel resulted in undue prejudice to Hornbeck, a prerequisite of the application of laches.

The answer remains to be seen whether the arrest of the vessel will ultimately impact the FNC analysis, but vessel owners should be cognizant of this issue during the pendency of litigation to avoid a vessel arrest that might endanger an otherwise valid FNC argument.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Baker Donelson | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Baker Donelson

Baker Donelson on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.