The Fifth Circuit Rejects EPA’s Disapproval of Alabama’s Opacity Regulation: Do We Blame EPA, DOJ, or Two Judges?

by Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

On Wednesday, in Alabama Environmental Council v. EPA, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected EPA’s 2011 disapproval of Alabama’s opacity regulation.  The case involves relatively obscure provisions of the Clean Air Act, but the decision nonetheless provides a number of – abject – lessons.

First, a short history.  In 2003, Alabama adopted a revision to its opacity regulations.  The revision allowed exceedances of the opacity standard, so long as those exceedances did not extend to more than 2% of a facility’s operating time during any calendar quarter.  With some interim history and details not worth summarizing here, EPA approved the opacity regulation in 2008.  On January 15, 2009, EPA rejected a formal petition that it reconsider its approval.  However, on February 25, 2009 (yes, I believe that there may have been a change in administration in the interim), a second petition was filed, and the second petition was granted in April 2009.  In 2011, EPA formally disapproved the Alabama regulation.

Under the CAA, absent a SIP Call, EPA may only modify a SIP in order to “correct” a SIP revision approved “in error.”  First abject lesson?  If EPA wants to reject a previously-approved SIP provision under § 110(k)(6), its chances of surviving judicial challenge increase if EPA actually identifies the error previously made when the SIP was originally approved.  This EPA failed to do.

Second abject lesson?  If you’re DOJ and you are representing EPA following a disapproval under § 110(k)(6), scour the record and identify the error that EPA corrected by the retroactive disapproval.  This DOJ failed to do.  According to the Court, the brief filed by DOJ “fails to provide a clear statement of the error committed in the 2008 approval.”  Moreover, at oral argument, the DOJ attorney apparently acknowledged that EPA’s Federal Register notice did not identify any specific error.

Third and final abject lesson?  While courts of appeal pay lip service to agency discretion, they pretty much do what they damn well please.  The two-judge majority here specifically said that they were not requiring EPA to use “magic words” to invoke § 110(k)(6).  However, as Judge Molloy noted in his dissent, that is basically just what the majority did.  First, Judge Molloy quotes extensively from EPA’s Federal Register promulgation of the disapproval – identifying, notwithstanding EPA’s failure to use the word “error” and the concession by DOJ, the errors in the 2008 approval.

My favorite part of the dissent is where Judge Molloy points out that

No one affected by EPA’s decision in this case claims they were unable to understand why the agency was concerned about its prior decision.  On the contrary, both the State and the utility industries avoid making any such claim….  The majority’s conclusion that the EPA “failed to articulate an error” reflects a determination of what the majority expects the articulation of error to sound like and less to do with the EPA’s process or its findings….

Isn’t that telling?  If everyone except the court of appeals majority knows what EPA considered to be the “error” in its 2008 SIP approval, isn’t that sufficient?  Sounds to me as though the majority did want the “magic words.”

Finally, I note that Judge Molloy is a district judge, sitting by designation.  Doesn’t seem as though he cares much if he’s invited back by the 5th Circuit.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law

Foley Hoag LLP - Environmental Law on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.