The Problem With Multiple Loans

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.
Contact

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.

When drafting new 401(k) plans, I always recommend allowing for a loan provision. I know there are quite a few plan providers who don’t want any provisions that allow “leakage” of retirement assets, but I believe that when times are tough, plan participants should have access through a loan that they can repay.

As far as loans go, I only want one loan outstanding at a time. If participants want a loan, fine, but let’s just let have one crack at it. A 401(k) plan shouldn’t turn into a payday loan type operation. However, the real reason that I’m against multiple loans is the difficulty in recordkeeping. Recordkeeping multiple plan loans can be an absolute headache especially when it comes to recordkeeping repayments. I’ve seen too many situations where errors in recordkeeping let one or more loans go into default and becoming a deemed distribution or a prohibited transaction when not deal with correctly.

If you ask for trouble, you’ll get it and I think that plan sponsors offering multiple plan loans are asking for it by allowing multiple loans that can only lead to a headache.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.
Contact
more
less

Ary Rosenbaum - The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C. on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide