The Transition Away From USD LIBOR for Swaps - A Report for U.S. Market Participants

by Moore & Van Allen PLLC
Contact

Moore & Van Allen PLLC

INTRODUCTION

With the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”)[i] announcing in July 2017, essentially, its intent to no longer persuade or compel panel banks to make LIBOR submissions by the end of 2021, the future of LIBOR, and its role in the trillions of dollars of interest rate products that use it as a benchmark, including over-the-counter (“OTC”) interest rate swaps, has become more uncertain.  LIBOR is a benchmark rate that measures the price at which certain members of the London interbank market will lend money to each other short-term and unsecured (when in reference to such lending in U.S. dollars, “USD LIBOR”).[ii]  A very common use of LIBOR is in OTC interest rate swaps between banks and commercial end-user counterparties.  The OTC interest rate swap effectively converts the more available or cheaper floating rate on loans into a fixed rate – this is a fixed-to-floating interest rate swap, and in the U.S. the floating leg is almost always denominated by USD LIBOR.

The reputation of LIBOR has suffered as a result of several panel banks agreeing to large settlements around the world, including settlements with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), Department of Justice, and FCA, in connection with claims of manipulation, attempted manipulation, and related offenses with respect to LIBOR.[iii]  LIBOR submissions have also drawn the attention of regulators and market participants because of their heavy reliance on the submitting parties’ expert judgment instead of actual transactions.[iv]  These events have helped create the political will to replace LIBOR as the standard interest rate benchmark in the U.S., as well as in the U.K. and Europe.  The phase-out of LIBOR appears set to take place over the next four years, with the end of 2021 as possibly the latest date that the FCA will continue requesting that panel banks contribute submissions towards the determination of LIBOR.  It is possible that at the end of 2021, or perhaps earlier, LIBOR will cease to be an effective rate for market participants.  However, it is also conceivable that the FCA could extend its timeline or that panel banks will continue to contribute prices voluntarily, thus extending the LIBOR phase-out indefinitely.  Further, other global regulators may intervene in some way to alter the timeline of the transition.  Therefore, notwithstanding the FCA’s recent statement, the timing of LIBOR’s replacement is very much in flux.

Regardless, industry groups and market participants must prepare for LIBOR to be phased out.  For existing interest rate swaps, particularly those that extend to 2021 or beyond, the issues include how to treat such swaps if LIBOR is phased out, and whether any current measures can be taken to account for costs and risks associated with the transition away from LIBOR.  For new swaps, the issue is whether and how to draft the swap’s terms to account for the eventual phasing out of LIBOR.

LIBOR REPLACEMENT

In the United States, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”), convened by the Federal Reserve, is working to establish a new rate as an alternative to USD LIBOR, and to adopt a plan that results in the liquidity of the chosen rate in futures and swaps markets.[v]  A new and currently unpublished broad Treasuries repo financing rate (being referred to now as the “Secured Overnight Funding Rate” or “SOFR”)[vi] has been selected by ARRC as the preferred benchmark rate to replace USD LIBOR in new financial products.[vii]  SOFR measures the cost of secured overnight loans that use government debt as collateral, known as repo transactions.  Two important differences between SOFR and USD LIBOR are: 1) SOFR is based on secured debt, whereas USD LIBOR is based on the price of unsecured lending; and 2) SOFR measures an overnight rate, whereas USD LIBOR measures the price offered at a series of short-term periods from overnight to one year.  It is still unclear how SOFR, based on overnight transactions, can or will effectively replace the longer-term, USD LIBOR maturities, such as the popular 1-month and 3-month USD LIBOR rate.  Note also that despite the initial preference for SOFR, ARRC has the ability to alter its course if the transition to SOFR presents unforeseen issues.  That being said, for the remainder of this paper, we will assume that SOFR (or some variation of it) will ultimately become the benchmark interest rate for USD-denominated transactions; however, unless the context provides otherwise, the analysis would be the same if another rate became the preferred replacement.

The timeline for phasing out USD LIBOR still contains uncertainties, though roughly the transition should take place as follows.  During the near term, expect ARRC to continue planning on the transition from USD LIBOR and work with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to publish SOFR.  To this end, in August 2017, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System requested public comment on its proposal for the publication of SOFR.  After the new rate is published, the next step is developing a market for derivatives that reference SOFR.  Once there is sufficient transaction volume in exchange-traded SOFR-denominated futures and swaps, the new data will facilitate reliable benchmark curves and a market shift from USD LIBOR to SOFR can naturally occur.  Because the market is underpinned by the hedging requirements of end users, it will be critical for the success of SOFR for it to gain acceptance in the wider loan market. 

FALLBACK PROVISIONS

Currently, OTC interest rate swaps have fallback provisions for instances where USD LIBOR is not available.  These fallbacks were negotiated under the assumption that USD LIBOR could become temporarily unavailable, not considering the possibility that USD LIBOR may become permanently unavailable.  Under the terms of most swaps, if USD LIBOR becomes unavailable, quotes from “reference banks” are used as a fallback.  It is unclear, however, whether reference banks would continue to provide quotes indefinitely.  Therefore, similar to the approach in previous LIBOR transitions, either amendments to or voluntary terminations of existing swaps may be necessary prior to USD LIBOR becoming permanently unavailable.  Because of the significant differences between LIBOR and SOFR, amending existing interest rate swaps could prove difficult, even after the establishment of the new benchmark rate.  If that is the case the parties may determine the looming disappearance of USD LIBOR will so materially change the swap that they mutually agree to a no-fault termination.  Upon termination, the parties could then enter into a subsequent arms-length swap transaction.  This may be an attractive option if the parties are amending an underlying credit agreement to replace USD LIBOR with a new rate.

If LIBOR ever ceases to be functional, termination of existing contracts, if not mutually agreed to by the parties, may present legal challenges.  Depending on whether the swap uses the 1992 or 2002 ISDA Master Agreement, a termination under the force majeure provision may be available.  While the 1992 ISDA Master Agreement does not contain such a provision, the 2002 ISDA Master Agreement does.  The inaccessibility of USD LIBOR and the failure or shortcomings of the contractually agreed fallbacks might be able to be construed as a qualifying event under such a provision.  Regardless of the presence of a force majeure provision or similar language, the existence of USD LIBOR could be interpreted to be so essential to interest rate swaps that its disappearance and the failure of the fallback provisions constitute a cause to terminate the swap.  The swap, in essence, as an instrument to convert an interest rate based on USD LIBOR to a fixed rate, would no longer exist, arguably justifying termination.  In such event, an accounting for the financial cost of the termination to either counterparty would also be appropriate, though it may be difficult to assess. [viii]  Ideally, market participants will negotiate a solution before any disruption of USD LIBOR occurs.  Contested terminations would be costly, harm existing relationships, and disrupt the market.

Market conformity is preferable to achieve a relatively smooth transition to a post-USD LIBOR marketplace.  The costs related to and complexity in dealing with varying alternative approaches will be unduly high, and produce unnecessary risks to market participants.  Therefore, expect trade organizations to take the lead on creating standardized solutions and frame a path to voluntarily amend or close out legacy transactions.  Even if such standardized solutions are further negotiated, it is more efficient to begin negotiations with a market structure. 

BASIS RISK

For most end-user counterparties, the main issue a transition to a new benchmark floating rate will present is simply whether they will continue to have a perfect hedge for their underlying rate-based obligation.  As long as the hedged obligation and the interest rate swap are denominated by the same rate, the counterparty should be able to achieve the goal of having a fixed rate with no basis risk.  Any scenario where the obligations under a credit agreement and the interest rate swap that hedges such obligations are not based on the same benchmark would create basis risk.  Managing basis risk is difficult and costly, particularly for end-users who may only enter into a handful of swaps and do not have the resources to manage a complex interest rate portfolio. 

CONCLUSION

The transition away from LIBOR to a new floating reference rate creates a variety of issues.  For banks and end-users that enter into swaps to convert a floating interest rate into a fixed rate, the major issues include how to interpret terms in existing swaps, what amendments, if any, will need to be effected, and whether there will be a need to close out legacy contracts.  By getting out in front of these issues, market participants can avoid costly and potentially risky scenarios regarding their interest rate derivative portfolios.


[i] The FCA regulates the financial services industry in the U.K.

[ii] This paper is focused on the possible transition away from USD LIBOR, though many of the concepts are equally valid with respect to LIBOR denominated in other currencies.  While in certain places “USD LIBOR” is referenced to indicate that the discussion considers only USD LIBOR, with respect to references to “LIBOR,” while the focus is still on activities being conducted in U.S. dollars, such references should be read as meaning all forms of LIBOR, including USD LIBOR.

[iii] As of February 3, 2017, the CFTC had issued penalties totaling $3.4 billion in connection with interest rate benchmark abuses, mostly involving LIBOR.  See the CFTC’s website for more information, at www.cftc.gov.

[iv] The decrease in actual transactions presents a problem because “expert judgment” submissions, are subject to high levels of scrutiny and potential liability due to the perception that expert judgments can easily be altered to affect the markets or prices for interest rate products.

[v] Interim Report and Consultation of the Alternate Rates Committee (May 2016), available at https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/microsites/arrc/files/2016/arrc-interim-report-and-consultation.pdf?la=en.

[vi] Formerly known as “Broad Treasuries Financing Rate.”

[vii] See ARRC press release dated June 22, 2017, available at https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/microsites/arrc/files/2017/ARRC-press-release-Jun-22-2017.pdf

[viii] See Interim Report and Consultation of the Alternate Rates Committee at pg. 6 n.10 (“Derivative contracts in general do not have robust backups in the event LIBOR ceased to be published, and untangling the numerous cross-institution financial obligations that would result from such an event would be operationally complicated and could be legally contentious.  In the interim, individual banks would have no firm certainty about the value of their positions as it would be unclear what rate should be paid or what rate would be received on any contract.  The value of these contracts would depend on the movement of interest rates since the time that they were entered into.”).

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Moore & Van Allen PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Moore & Van Allen PLLC
Contact
more
less

Moore & Van Allen PLLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.