This Week in 340B: January 13 – 19, 2026

McDermott Will & Schulte

Find the week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other; Rebate Model

  • In a case challenging a Vermont law, the government moved to file an amicus brief.
  • In a case challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a response to the court’s order to show cause concerning consolidation.
  • In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging an Oklahoma state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant filed a motion for protective order and to stay discovery and the plaintiffs filed a memorandum in opposition to the defendant’s renewed motion to stay discovery and for protective order.
  • In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a brief in support of its motion for a preliminary injunction.
  • In a case brought by a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging an Oregon state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendants moved for summary judgment.
  • In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging an Oregon state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendants moved for summary judgment.
  • In a case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Maine state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed an opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
  • In a case against HRSA seeking to compel HRSA to timely adjudicate a dispute resolution proceeding against a drug manufacturer, defendants filed an answer.
  • In a case related to rebate models, the defendants filed a consent motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, with the consent of plaintiffs.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© McDermott Will & Schulte

Written by:

McDermott Will & Schulte
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

McDermott Will & Schulte on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide