This Week In Securities Litigation

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Contact

The question of forum selection by the SEC was a key issue this week. While to date suits challenging the SEC’s right to bring an action as an administrative proceeding rather than in federal court have had little success – until now. This week a judge sitting in the Northern District of Georgia enjoined the Commission from proceeding with an administrative proceeding in which the Respondent was charged with insider trading. While the Court rejected most of the claims asserted against the Commission, it concluded that the plaintiff has a probability of success on the merits as to its claim based on the Constitution’s Appointment Clause regarding the manner in which SEC ALJ’s are appointed. A preliminary injunction was issued against the Commission.

In similar action, the DOJ told the Court that the Appointment Clause ruling was incorrect. There investment manager Lynn Tilton and her funds are also challenging the SEC’s right to file charges in and administrative proceeding rather than in federal district court. Tilton v. SEC, No. 1:15-cv-02472 (S.D.N.Y.). At the same time, in the underlying administrative proceeding Ms. Tilton claimed the Division did not have sufficient evidence to sustain its charges. The investment manager and her entities filed a motion to halt the Division from search for new evidence on the eve of trial, arguing that it was trying to create a “substitute case” for trial because, despite years of investigation, there was no evidence to support the charges. Respondents coupled that motion with a request for summary disposition. In the Matter of Lynn Tilton, Adm. Proc. File No. 3-16462 (Motion Filed June 5, 2015). The underlying case is discussed here.

SEC

Remarks: Commissioner Kara M. Stein delivered remarks titled “Quality Data and the Power of Prevention” at Meet the Market, North America, New York, New York (June 10, 2015). In her remarks the Commissioner discussed creating an Office of Data Strategy at the SEC that would be overseen by a Chief Data Officer (here).

CFTC

Remarks: Chairman Timothy G. Massad delivered remarks to the FIA International Derivatives Conference, London, England (June 9, 2015). The Chairman discussed the regulation of clearing houses, trading and the margin for swaps (here).

Forum Selection Suits

In Hill v. SEC, Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-01801 (N.D. Ga. Filed June 8, 2015) the Respondent in an SEC administrative proceeding charging insider trading filed a complaint alleging: 1) That the proceeding violated Article II of the Constitution because ALJs are protected by two layers of tenure protection; 2) that Congress’ delegation of authority to the SEC to pursue cases against non-regulated persons before ALJs violates the delegation doctrine in Article I of the Constitution; 3) that Congress violated his Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial by permitting the SEC to bring the action in an administrative forum, and that the SEC ALJ’s appointment violated the Appointments Clause of Article II. After rejecting the SEC’s challenge to jurisdiction the Court held that the plaintiff had a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits of the Appointment Clause claim based largely on Free Enterprise. Fund. V. PCAOB, 561 U.S. 477 (2010). The Court issued a preliminary injunction against the SEC.

SEC Enforcement – Litigated Actions

Conflicts: In the Matter of The Robare Group, Ltd., Adm. Proc. File No. 3-16047 (Initial Decision June 4, 2015) is a proceeding which named as Respondents the investment adviser, its founder, Mark Robare and a limited partner, Jack Jones, Jr. The Order centered on alleged undisclosed conflicts between the adviser and its broker. It charged violations of Advisers Act Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 207. The action is discussed in detail here.Following a hearing on the merits SEC ALJ Grimes (also the ALJ in the Hill cases discussed above) concluded in an Initial Decision that the Staff had failed to establish the alleged violations.

SEC Enforcement – Filed and Settled Actions

Statistics: During this period the SEC filed 7 civil injunctive cases and 3 administrative actions, excluding 12j and tag-along proceedings.

Rule 105: SEC v. Langston, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-24360 (S.D. Fla.) is a previously filed action which named as defendants Mr. Langston, CRL Management, LLC and Guaranteed Reinsurance, Ltd.. The complaint alleged violations of Rule 105 of Regulation M which prohibits short selling an equity security during a restricted period prior to a secondary offering and insider trading. Illegal short sales in advance of separate offerings by Wells Fargo, Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Alcoa is alleged in the complaint. Defendants resolved the matter. Previously, the Court entered a final judgment of permanent injunction as to each defendant based on Securities Act Section 17(a), Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 105. In addition, Mr. Langston was ordered to pay disgorgement of $193,108, prejudgment interest and a civil money penalty equal to the amount of the disgorgement. The Court left open the monetary remedies under Rule 105. The Court has now entered final judgments finding the defendants jointly and severally liable for the payment of disgorgement in the amount of $912,854, prejudgment interest and a civil penalty of $502,069 on the Rule 105 violation. See Lit. Rel. No. 23281 (June 11, 2015).

Prime bank fraud: In the Matter of Spectrum Concepts, LLC, Adm. Proc. File No. 3-16358 (June 11, 2015) is an action which names as Respondents: Spectrum, its president and owner Donald Worswick, Michael Grosso and Michael Brown. The Order alleges a prime bank fraud from May through October 2012 in which investors were told that their funds would be placed in private funding projects and used to set up a credit facility that would be blocked for the benefit of a trading platform. It was represented to investors that they would earn returns of 900% in 20 days to 4,627% annually. Overall about $465,000 was raised by Respondents, although portions were returned when the investors backed out. The Order alleges violations of Securities Act Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) along with Exchange Act Section 10(b). Respondents Spectrum and Worshwick settled, consenting to the entry of cease and desist orders based on the Sections cited in the Order. In addition, Mr. Worswick agreed to pay disgorgement of $166,500, prejudgment interest and a civil penalty of $120,000. A fair fund will be established. The other Respondents did not resolve the case.

Investment fund fraud: SEC v. Lattanzio (D. N.J. Filed June 10, 2015) is an action which names as defendants Mr. Lattanzio and his controlled entities, Black Diamond Investments, L.P., Black Diamond GP, LLC, Black Diamond Investments LLC and Black Diamond Capital Appreciation Fund, L.P. Beginning in August 2011, and continuing for the next three years, Mr. Lattanzio misappropriated about $5 million from investors who were induced to place their money in Black Diamond Capital Appreciation Fund. Investors were falsely told that he would arrange project financing for them and generate substantial returns on the money invested. In fact he misappropriated the money and used it for himself. The complaint alleges violations of Securities Act Section 17(a), Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Advisers Act Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4). A parallel criminal action was filed by the U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey. The cases are pending.

Rule 105: SEC v. Evans, Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-02551 (N.D. Cal. June 9, 2015) alleges that Mr. Evans, through is firm Maritime Asset Management, violated Rule 105 on nearly a dozen occasions from December 2010 to May 2012 by short selling an equity security during the restricted period and then purchasing the same security in the offering. Mr. Evans resolved the case, consenting to the entry of a permanent injunction based on Rule 105 and agreeing to pay disgorgement of $582, 175, prejudgment interest and a penalty of $364,389. See Lit. Rel. No. 23280 (June 9, 2015).

Insider trading: SEC v. Fefferman, Civil Action No. 15 CV 1276 (S.D. Cal. Filed June 9, 2015). The action centered on trading while in possession of inside information in the shares of Ardea Biosciences, Inc., over a three year period beginning in April 2009. The defendants are: Senior Director of Information Technology at Ardea, Michael Fefferman; his brother-in-law, broker Chad Wiegand; Mr. Wiegand’s friend and co-worker, broker Akis Eracleous. Other tippees not named as defendants are a Business Partner of Mr. Eracleous and Customer A, a brokerage customer of Mr. Eracleous who was also friends with Business Partner and Relief Defendant Eracles Panayioutou, a brokerage client and cousin of Mr. Eracleous. Mr. Fefferman is alleged to have tipped Mr. Wiegand who in turn tipped Mr. Eracleous who tipped the others in advance of four significant corporate events: 1) The April 29, 2009 announcement that the firm had entered into an agreement with Bayer HealthCare, LLC. Following the deal announcement the purchased shares were sold: Mr. Eracleous had profits of $13,504; Business Partner — $5,693; Mr. Eracleous — $5,184; and Mr. Wiegand — $19,132 in client accounts. 2) The December 1, 2009 announcement of test results for RDEA594. Following the announcement of the news the shares were sold: Mr. Wiegard had profits of $820; and Panayiouto’s account — $4,165; and Mr. Eracleous caused Panayioutou’s account to acquire 5,000 shares yielding $26,592 in illicit profits. 4) On April 23, 2012 Ardea and AstraZeneca announced a merger. Following the announcement the purchased shares were sold: Mr. Wiegand had profits of $215,297; Business Partner purchased 200 call options in the account of Panayioutou, yielding $167,037; and Mr. Eracleous and Business Partner tipped Customer A who agreed to purchase 100 options in his account and divide the profits among the three – the options yielded illegal trading profits of $83,493. The complaint alleges violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b). Each of the three named defendants agreed to settle the action subject to Court approval. Disgorgement, prejudgment interest and penalties will be determined at a later date. Messrs. Wiegand and Eracieous also agreed to be barred from the securities business. A parallel criminal action was brought by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of California against Messrs. Wiegand and Eracious.

Insider trading: SEC v. Andrade, Civil Action No. 15-cv-231 (D. R.I. Filed June 8, 2015). This action centers on the acquisition of Bancorp Rhode Island, Inc. by Brookline Bankcorp, Inc., announced on April 20, 2011. Defendant Anthony Andrade was a member of Bancorp RI’s board of directors for about 14 years. Defendants Fred Goldwyn, Robert Kielbasa and Kenneth Rampino are all long time business associates and friends of Mr. Andrade. The acquisition transaction traces to February 2011 when the Bancorp RI board of directors received a presentation from the firm’s financial advisers on strategic directions. By mid-April 2011 the board narrowed its choices and directed management to pursue a proposal with Brookline. By April 19, 2011 the two parties arrived at a deal. Brookline agreed to pay $48.25 per share for the stock of Bancorp RI which was trading at the time at $31 per share. The deal was announced the next day. Mr. Andrade, who participated in the discussions, is alleged to have tipped: Mr. Kielbasa, who acquired 3,000 shares of Bancorp RI which was sold after the announcement for a profit of $39, 645; Mr. Goldwyn who acquired 1,650 shares of a stock which were sold after the deal announcement for a profit of $21,458; and Mr. Rampino who acquired1,500 shares which yielded a post deal profit of $18,959. The complaint alleges the tips were “illicit gifts” or a “business opportunity.” It charges violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b). Messrs. Goldwyn and Kielbasa agreed to settle with the SEC. Each consented to the entry of a permanent injunction prohibiting future violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b). Mr. Kielbasa also agreed to pay disgorgement of $39,645, prejudgment interest and a civil penalty equal to his trading profits. Similarly, Mr. Goldwyn agreed to pay disgorgement of $23,565, prejudgment interest and a civil penalty equal to his trading profits. Messrs. Andrade and Rampino did not settle. See Lit. Rel. No. 23278 (June 8, 2015).

In the Matter of Computer Sciences Corporation, Adm. Proc. File No. 3-16575 (June 5, 2015); SEC v. Edwards, Civil Action No. 15 CV 04339 (S.D.N.Y. Filed June 5, 2015); SEC v. Parker, Civil Action No. 15 CV 04341 (S.D.N.Y. Filed June 5, 2015); SEC v. Sutcliffe, Civil Action No. 15 CV 04340 (S.D.N.Y. Filed June 5, 2015). The action centers on fraudulent conduct that occurred over a two year period beginning in 2009 in connection with the falsification of earnings from a multi-billion dollar with the U.K.’s National Health Service or NHS. It also involved separate fraudulent conduct that occurred in the firm’s Australian subsidiary and its Nordic region.

The settled administrative proceeding named as Respondents the firm, CEO Michael Laphen, CFO Michael Mancuso, CFO of the Australian subsidiary Wayne Banks, Nordic Region Finance Manager Claus Zilmer and Nordic Region Finance Director Paul Wakefield. The separate actions, each of which is being litigated, named as defendants Nordic Finance Manager Chris Edwards, Australia Controller Edward Parker and Finance Director for the NHS Robert Sutcliffe.

While the NHL contract was projected to be profitable, it quickly became unprofitable largely because the firm could not meet the deadlines. Rather than report a loss, the company continued to report profits largely by falsifying the projections from the revenue model. Those false projections were bolstered by misleading statements to the public.

Accounting violations also occurred in the internal business segments of Computer Sciences. In Australia regional CFO Wayne Banks and Controller Edward Parker manipulated the earnings through excess accruals maintained in “cookie jar” reserves. They also failed to record expenses as required. This permitted them to meet analysts’ earnings targets while causing the firm’s consolidated pretax income to be overstated by 5% in Q1FY2009. Similarly, in FY 2010 the firm’s Nordic region manipulated its operating results. Nordic Region Finance Director Paul Wakefield, and others, improperly accounted for client disputes, overstated assets and capitalized expenses. The accounting fraud in Denmark resulted in the overstatement of the firm’s consolidated pre-tax income by 5% in Q1FY 2010, 3% in Q2FY2010, 4% in Q3FY2010 and 7% in Q4F2010. As a result of these actions the financial statements of Computer Science for FY 2010, 2011 and 2012 contained material errors. A restatement was required. During the 12 month period that followed the filing of those periodic reports Messrs. Laphen and Mancuso received bonuses and incentive-based compensation. Neither official reimbursed the firm. The Order alleges violations of each subsection of Securities Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 13(b)(5).

To resolve the proceeding the firm consented to the entry of a cease and desist order based on Securities Act Sections 17(a) and Exchange Act Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B). The firm will also pay a civil penalty of $190 million.

Mr. Laphen consented to the entry of a cease and desist order. It is based on Securities Act Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) and Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) as well as SOX Section 304. He is denied the privilege of appearing and practicing before the Commission as an accountant with the right to apply for reinstatement after three years. Mr. Laphen will also pay a civil money penalty of $750,000 and, under SOX Section 304, $3,771,000 to the firm. Mr. Mancuso consented to the entry of a cease and desist order based on Securities Act Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) and Exchange Act Sections 13(a) and SOX Section 304. Mr. Mancuso will pay a penalty of $175,000 and, under SOX Section 304, $369,100 to the firm. Mr. Zilmer consented to the entry of a cease and desist order based on Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B). Mr. Wakefield also agreed to the entry of a cease and desist order based on the same Sections and, in addition, Exchange Act Section 13(b)(5). Both men are denied the privilege of appearing or practicing before the Commission as an accountant with a right to apply for reinstatement after, respectively, four years and three years. In addition, Mr. Wakefield is barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company for three years. Mr. Banks consented to the entry of a cease and desist order based on Securities Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 13(b)(5). In addition, he is barred from serving as an officer or a director of a public company for four years and denied the right to appear or practice before the Commission as an accountant with a right to apply for reinstatement after four years. Mr. Banks will also pay disgorgement of $10,990 along with prejudgment interest. A fair fund was created for the civil penalties. Messrs. Edwards, Parker and Sutcliffe did not settled with the Commission.

In the separate civil injunctive actions the SEC alleged violations of: As to Mr. Edwards, Sections 17(a)(1) & (3) and Exchange Act Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 13(b)(5); and as to Messrs. Parker and Sutcliffe, Securities Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A), 13(b)(2)(B) and 13(b)(5). These actions are being litigated.

Unregistered broker: In the Matter of Mark G. Brickman, Adm. Proc. File No. 3-16576 (June 5, 2015) is a proceeding which names as Respondents Mr. Brockman and Mark Baratto. The Order alleges that over a period of five years, beginning in October 2008, the two men founded, owned and conducted business through three day trading firms that operated as unregistered broker-dealers. Respondents used the three entities to create sub-accounts for traders, hold customer funds and securities and provide margin. Trading was arranged through electronic trading platforms. Trades were cleared through an omnibus account. In exchange for the services, customers were charged commissions. The Order alleges violations of Exchange Act Section 15(a)(1). Each Respondent settled, consenting to the entry of a cease and desist order based on Exchange Act Section 15(a)(1). In addition, the two men will pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement in the amount of $67,446.62 and prejudgment interest. Each will separately pay a penalty in the amount of $25,000.

Australia

Continuous disclosure: Rhinomed Limited was fined $33,000 for failing to comply with its continuous disclosure obligations. The failure is based on the fact that the firm entered into an agreement on June 6, 2014 with Fitness First regarding a promotional campaign for its Turbine Product used by some gyms. However, the firm failed to disclose the agreement as required to the Australian Securities Investment Commission until July 9, 2014.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dorsey & Whitney LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Contact
more
less

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

Related Case Law

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.