Through a Glass Darkly: A U Optronics and the Extraterritorial Application of the Sherman Act

by Cohen & Gresser LLP

Can price-fixing abroad be prosecuted criminally under the U.S. Sherman Act?  The antitrust bar might well raise an eyebrow at the question.  Since international cartels became a focus of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division (the “Division”) in the 1990s, U.S. prosecutions of non-U.S. citizens for conduct occurring abroad have become routine.  In 1999 the first non-U.S. citizen was sentenced to jail in the U.S. for a criminal violation of the Sherman Act.  Between 1999 and 2011, 47 non-U.S. citizens were sentenced to prison by U.S. courts, compared to 102 U.S. citizens over the same period.  Many of the major cartel prosecutions in recent years (marine hose, air transportation, liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD), and dynamic random access memory (DRAM)) have concerned conduct taking place mostly or entirely abroad. 

Now several defendants in the TFT-LCD case, citing the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S. Ct. 2869 (2010), are arguing that the Sherman Act cannot be used to prosecute their conduct.  As described in a brief filed by Taiwanese defendants Hui Hsuing and Hsuan Bin Chen, the participants in the TFT-LCD cartel were all Taiwanese and Korean manufacturers, and their meetings all took place in Taiwan.  The initial purchasers of the TFT-LCD panels, who were either systems integrators or original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), were all located outside the United States.

Since 2008, the Division has racked up multiple convictions in its investigation of the alleged cartel.  As of the end of 2012, eight companies had pleaded guilty or been convicted and had been sentenced to pay fines of more than $1.39 billion.  Of 22 executives charged, 13 had been convicted or pleaded guilty and seven remained fugitives.  Among those convicted were A U Optronics, Inc. (“A U Optronics”), which was sentenced to pay a $500 million fine, and its former executives Hsuing and Chen, who were sentenced to serve three years in prison and pay a $200,000 criminal fine.

Hsuing and Chen, buttressed by an amicus brief filed by Professor Andrew Guzman of the Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall), argue that the imposition of fines and imprisonment on the Taiwanese corporation and citizens is improper under Morrison.  In Morrison, the Court overturned decades of lower-court precedent and held that § 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 did not apply extraterritorially.  It instructed courts to rely on the longstanding presumption against extraterritorial application of U.S. law on the principle that “legislation of Congress, unless a contrary intent appears, is meant to apply only within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”  130 S. Ct. at 2877, citing EEOC v. Arabian American Oil Co., 499 U.S. 244, 248 (1991) (“Aramco”).  A U Optronics and the Taiwanese Federation of Industries have joined in Hsuing and Chen’s brief.[1]    

There are serious hurdles to holding that the Sherman Act does not permit the criminal prosecution of extraterritorial conduct.  First, Congress has arguably manifested an intent to apply the Sherman Act abroad, via the Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act (“FTAIA”), 15 U.S.C. §6a, enacted in 1982.  This statute seeks to assure that “restraints on export trade only violate the Sherman Act if they have a direct and substantial effect on commerce within the United States or a domestic firm competing for foreign trade.”  H.R. Rep. 97-686 at 7-8.  The defendants and the amicus argue that the FTAIA was intended to limit the reach of the Sherman Act, not expand it, and that in any case it does not evidence a Congressional intent to apply Section 1 to prosecute conduct overseas.

Second, the Supreme Court itself has already stated that the Sherman Act applies to foreign conduct “that was meant to produce and did in fact produce some substantial effect in the United States.”  Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. California, 509 U.S. 764, 795-96 (1993).  Defendants argue, as they must, that Hartford Fire is inconsistent with Morrison and should be repudiated.  They further note that Hartford Fire concerned a civil lawsuit, not the criminal charges at issue in the TFT-LCD prosecutions.           

Assuming the question eventually reaches the Supreme Court, it would be rather daring for the Court to hold that Section 1 cannot be used to prosecute criminal conduct abroad.   As the statistics quoted above show, the Department of Justice has used the Sherman Act aggressively to prosecute international cartels over the past 20 years; it would mark a very sharp change in legal practice, if not in controlling precedent, to hold that prosecutors had acted beyond their authority.  By contrast, the conduct-and-effects test abrogated in Morrison had already circumscribed the extraterritorial reach of Section 10(b).  The conduct at issue in Morrison involved misstatements concerning the prospects of an American subsidiary of an Australian bank, whose shares were traded exclusively on Australian exchanges.  The district court and appeals court, as well as Justices Stevens and Ginsburg in their Morrison concurrence, all held that Section 10(b) would not apply under the conduct-and-effects test.  130 S. Ct. at 2895.  Finally, of course, even if the Court does hold that Section 1 of the Sherman Act does not apply extraterritorially, it remains open for Congress to overrule the holding.  For example, in Aramco, the Court held that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did not apply to U.S. employers of U.S. citizens abroad; Congress promptly amended the statute to make clear that it did.  See Aramco, 499 U.S. at 246-47; see Civil Rights Act of 1991, § 109, 150 Stat. 1077 (overruling Aramco).

[1] In its own brief, A U Optronics additionally argues that (i) foreign price fixing is governed by the rule of reason, not the per se rule, and (ii) the alleged conspiracy was not aimed at the United States and did not have sufficient effects here to support the convictions.

About the Authors

Mr. Cohen is a partner and co-founder of the firm, and head of its Litigation & Arbitration practice group and its Chambers USA recognized White Collar Defense, Regulatory Enforcement and Internal Investigations practice group. He is a former Assistant United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York. Mr. Cohen was recognized as a leading lawyer in his field by the 2013 edition of Chambers USA, the 2013 edition of Benchmark Litigation, and included as one of New York’s Super Lawyers in 2008-2012.

Mr. Thomson is counsel at the firm and has experience in commercial litigation, antitrust matters, white collar criminal defense, regulatory enforcement and internal investigations.  Mr. Thomson is a graduate of Columbia Law School where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar and was on the Editorial Board of the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law.

About Cohen & Gresser

Cohen & Gresser is a 2013 Chambers USA ranked boutique law firm with offices in New York and Seoul. We represent clients in complex litigation and corporate transactions throughout the world. Founded in 2002, the firm has grown to over fifty lawyers in four practice groups: Litigation and Arbitration; Corporate Law; Intellectual Property and Licensing; and White Collar Defense, Regulatory Enforcement and Internal Investigations. Our attorneys are graduates of the nation's best law schools and have exceptional credentials. We are committed to providing the efficiency and personal service of a boutique firm and the superb quality and attention to detail that are hallmarks of the top firms where we received our training.

NEW YORK | SEOUL                           PH: +1 212 957 7600

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cohen & Gresser LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cohen & Gresser LLP

Cohen & Gresser LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.