Two Non-U.S. Banks Agree to Pay Penalties Totaling $160 Million for Violations of U.S. Sanctions Laws Resulting from Omnibus Account and Related Services

by Dechert LLP

Recent enforcement actions brought by the U.S. Government against non-U.S. banks for violations of U.S. sanctions laws demonstrate the need for financial institutions, particularly those that act as custodians or financial intermediaries, to implement measures to ensure compliance with those laws. These actions highlight the significant compliance risks faced by non-U.S. financial institutions that conduct business through the U.S. financial system while maintaining accounts on behalf of entities subject to U.S. sanctions. In addition, the cases represent the latest in a series of regulatory actions highlighting the anti-money laundering (“AML”) and sanctions compliance risks presented when U.S. financial institutions maintain omnibus accounts in the United States for non-U.S. financial institutions.

On January 24, 2014, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) released details regarding a settlement agreement with Clearstream Banking S.A. (“Clearstream”), a Luxembourg financial entity, under which Clearstream agreed to pay a penalty of approximately $152 million and undertake remedial compliance measures in connection with violations of the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (“ITSR”). OFAC charged that Clearstream maintained an omnibus account at a U.S. financial institution through which the Central Bank of Iran (“CBI”) maintained a beneficial ownership in certain U.S. securities.

Clearstream met with OFAC officials in 2007 and 2008 to discuss the closure of all Clearstream accounts that it maintained for Iranian customers, including accounts for the CBI. Following those meetings, Clearstream transferred the U.S. securities entitlements held by the CBI to a newly-opened custodian account maintained for another European bank customer. However, while this transfer resulted in a change in the record ownership of the securities entitlements held through Clearstream, the CBI continued to be the beneficial owner of the U.S. securities.

Given that Clearstream maintained an omnibus account with the U.S. financial institution, the beneficial owner of the securities ultimately held by CBI was not known to the U.S. financial institution. OFAC alleged that Clearstream unlawfully exported custody and related services from the United States to the CBI in violation of the ITSR.1 In addition to paying the nearly $152 million penalty, Clearstream agreed to implement policies and procedures intended to prevent the reoccurrence of such violations.

Separately, on January 27, 2014, OFAC announced a settlement agreement with the Joint-Stock Commercial Bank “Bank of Moscow” (“Bank of Moscow”) related to violations of U.S. sanctions laws. Bank of Moscow agreed to pay a penalty of approximately $9.5 million to settle charges that it processed numerous funds transfers through the United States on behalf of Bank Melli Iran ZAO, an entity that was designated on the List of Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons. None of the SWIFT payment messages sent by Bank of Moscow included specific references to Bank Melli Iran ZAO, and instead used abbreviations that caused U.S. financial institutions to automatically process the transfers as they were not aware of the involvement of the designated bank.

In connection with these matters, OFAC issued guidance regarding the steps that financial institutions, including those that act as custodians and securities intermediaries, should take in order to accurately identify the beneficial ownership of assets and prevent sanctions violations. The measures recommended by OFAC include, among others: 

  • Making customers/omnibus account owners aware of the institution’s sanctions compliance obligations and requiring certifications from the customer to comply with such obligations; 
  • Conducting due diligence to identify customers/firms who do business in or with entities subject to U.S. sanctions; and
  • Considering restrictions on the use of certain services that pose a higher risk of sanctions violations, such as limitations on the use of omnibus accounts.

These cases represent the latest in the series of regulatory actions highlighting the AML and sanctions compliance risks presented when U.S. financial institutions maintain omnibus accounts for the benefit of non-U.S. firms. For example, in 2010 the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) charged U.S. broker-dealer Pinnacle Capital Markets LLC (“Pinnacle”) with violating the customer identification program rules under the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) when it failed to verify the identity of sub-account holders in omnibus accounts held by non-U.S. financial institutions, even though the sub-account holders had “direct, unfiltered control” over securities transactions in the accounts.2 FinCEN noted that the “[f]irm’s business model encompassed heightened AML risk due to concentrated exposure to high risk foreign jurisdictions.” Separately, in 2012, FinCEN issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking seeking comments regarding the concept of requiring financial institutions to obtain information about beneficial owners of assets in accounts held by intermediaries.3 FinCEN acknowledged the difficulty in obtaining information about the beneficial owner of assets held in an omnibus account, and requested comments on “whether a potential explicit obligation to identify the beneficial owners of assets in an account should be based upon the financial institution’s risk assessment of the customer, or whether a more specific obligation would be appropriate.”

Taken together, these regulatory actions underscore the need for appropriate, risk-based due diligence when non-U.S. financial intermediaries maintain omnibus accounts with financial institutions in the United States. U.S. financial institutions should assess the risks posed by such omnibus accounts, including the regulated status of the accountholders, the jurisdictions in which they operate, and the overall AML and sanctions risks posed by the accounts. The recent OFAC settlements demonstrate that appropriate due diligence on non-U.S. omnibus accounts is imperative from both an AML/BSA perspective and for complying with OFAC-administered sanctions programs.


1) 31 C.F.R. 560.204 (providing that “the exportation, … directly or indirectly, from the United States, … of any goods, technology, or services to Iran or the Government of Iran is prohibited”).

2) See, e.g., In the Matter of Pinnacle Capital Markets, LLC, FinCEN Release 2010-4 (Sept. 1, 2010).

3) Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions, 77 Fed. Reg. 13046 (Mar. 5, 2012).


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dechert LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dechert LLP

Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.