U.S. Supreme Court denies certiorari in discrimination case

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On January 12, the U.S. Supreme Court announced it had denied certiorari in a case challenging a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that addressed issues under the Fair Housing Act, including standards for equitable tolling, disparate impact, and causation in discrimination claims.

The petition argued that the 2nd Circuit split from other circuits by adopting a “fairness-based” approach to equitable tolling in mortgage discrimination claims without requiring plaintiffs to show diligence. This, in turn, allowed disparate impact claims to proceed based on lending practices that had an “adverse or disproportionate” effect on one racial group rather than requiring proof of a disproportionate effect compared to other groups, and treating the “robust causality” requirement outlined in a separate case as non-binding.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

What do you want from legal thought leadership?

Please take our short survey – your perspective helps to shape how firms create relevant, useful content that addresses your needs:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide