U.S. Supreme Court denies lender’s cert. petition in case upholding CFPB’s $134M restitution award

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari in a case challenging a 9th Circuit ruling that upheld a $134 million restitution award to the CFPB. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the petition sought review of whether a claim for legal restitution triggers the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial and whether a litigant may validly waive a constitutional right when prevailing circuit precedent forecloses its exercise. The restitution award stemmed from allegations that interest and fees were collected on loans void under state law, with the district court calculating restitution based on net revenues and the 9th Circuit affirming that approach (covered by InfoBytes here). The denial leaves intact the 9th Circuit’s conclusion that no form of restitution triggers the right to a jury trial, despite arguments that this conflicts with Supreme Court precedent and other circuit decisions.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations. Attorney Advertising.

© Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Written by:

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Contact
more
less

PUBLISH YOUR CONTENT ON JD SUPRA

  • Increased readership
  • Actionable analytics
  • Ongoing writing guidance

Join more than 70,000 authors publishing their insights on JD Supra

Start Publishing »

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide