U.S. Supreme Court Limits Restitution Available in Federal Criminal Cases

King & Spalding
Contact

On May 29, 2018, the United States Supreme Court decided Lagos v. United States, narrowly interpreting the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”) to bar crime victims from recovering the costs of their private investigations and civil proceedings. The Supreme Court’s decision closes an important avenue for companies across all sectors—from financial institutions and services to healthcare and energy—to recoup costs associated with internal investigations, audits, and civil proceedings, even if they lead to federal criminal charges.

BACKGROUND -

The MVRA requires defendants convicted of certain federal criminal offenses, “including any offense committed by fraud or deceit . . . in which an identifiable victim . . . has suffered a . . . pecuniary loss,” to “make restitution to the victim of the offense . . . .”Restitution includes “reimburse[ment] [to] the victim for lost income . . . and other expenses incurred during participation in the investigation or prosecution of the offense or attendance at proceedings related to the offense.”

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

King & Spalding
Contact
more
less

King & Spalding on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide