Eleventh Circuit Affirms Two Grants of Summary Judgment in Favor of Diabetic Experts

by Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

A unanimous panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (Eleventh Circuit) recently affirmed two grants of summary judgment in favor of defendant Lincare, Inc. d/b/a Diabetic Experts of America (collectively, “Diabetic Experts”) by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (District Court).  Diabetic Experts provided diabetic supplies to Medicare patients, some of whom had previously ordered medical supplies from Diabetic Experts for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).  To promote sales, staff at Diabetic Experts would place calls to individuals who had previously ordered COPD-related equipment regarding a need for diabetic supplies.

The relators in the action were two former salespersons of Diabetic Experts, who alleged that Diabetic Experts violated the FCA by submitting claims to Medicare that: (1) were submitted without adequate authorization for the Medicare beneficiaries; and (2) resulted from improper, unsolicited telemarketing calls to Medicare beneficiaries in violation of the governing Medicare regulations.  To plead their case, the relators initially appended six examples of claims submitted by Diabetic Experts to Medicare to the complaint, which they purported were sufficient to establish FCA liability.

Diabetic Experts moved for summary judgment on the ground that the Medicare claims complied with applicable Medicare regulations, and therefore did not give rise to FCA liability.  The District Court granted that motion, primarily resting its decision on the ground that “[a] reasonable, but erroneous interpretation of a complex statutory or regulatory scheme should not, without facts, demonstrat[e] reckless disregard” sufficient to establish the scienter requirement for an FCA claim.  In its lengthy memorandum opinion, the District Court “recognized the possibility that its order may not be dispositive to the entire case,” and therefore did not grant summary judgment in its entirety.  Thereafter, the relators cited three additional examples of alleged Medicare claims submitted by Diabetic Experts.

Diabetic Experts again moved for summary judgment with respect to the relators’ newly-raised claims, and the District Court granted that motion.  Notably, the District Court held that the three additional examples proffered by the relators “fell within the exception to the anti-telemarketing prescription that applies where the beneficiary gives written permission to the Medicare supplier.”  See 42 C.F.R. § 424.57(c)(11)(i) (stating that a supplier must “agree not to contact a beneficiary by telephone when supplying a Medicare-covered item” unless “[t]he individual has given written permission to the supplier to contact them by telephone concerning the furnishing of a Medicare-covered item that is to be rented or purchased.”)  The relators appealed, and the Eleventh Circuit’s analysis focused on the scienter requirement of the FCA, requiring a relator to establish that a defendant acted “knowingly” – either by demonstrating “actual knowledge,” “deliberate ignorance,” or “reckless disregard” on the part of the defendant.  Notably, neither “innocent mistakes” nor “simple negligence” will suffice.

The Eleventh Circuit, with respect to the District Court’s first summary judgment order, flatly rejected the basis for the District Court’s decision, stating that “a defendant’s reasonable interpretation of any ambiguity inherent in the regulation belies the scienter necessary to establish a claim of fraud under the FCA.”  Rather, according to the Eleventh Circuit, the District Court “must determine whether the defendant actually knew or should have known that its conduct violated a regulation in light of any ambiguity at the time of the alleged violation.”  As a matter of policy, the Eleventh Circuit further explained that, under the District Court’s interpretation of the FCA, “a defendant could avoid liability by relying on a ‘reasonable’ interpretation of an ambiguous regulation manufactured post hoc, despite having actual knowledge of a different authoritative interpretation.”

Notwithstanding its criticism of the District Court’s reasoning, the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the District Court’s rulings under “the correct standard.”  With respect to the evidence proffered by the relators – one email addressing “an entirely different compliance issue” and another “postdat[ing] the relevant transactions by several months” – the Eleventh Circuit agreed with the District Court that no reasonable jury could conclude that Diabetic Experts knowingly submitted false claims.  Nor did the Eleventh Circuit find any evidence that Diabetic Experts violated 42 C.F.R. § 424.57(c) under a plain reading of the regulation, which permits a supplier to contact a Medicare beneficiary via telephone when the beneficiary: (1) provides written permission for a supplier to contact them by telephone concerning the furnishing of a Medicare-covered item; or (2) receives at least one covered item from the supplier during the 15-month period preceding the date of contact.  Notably, the District Court and the Sixth Circuit agreed that all of the relators’ examples of purported FCA violations fell squarely within those two exceptions.

The Eleventh Circuit, based on the above analysis, found nothing to suggest that Diabetic Experts or its “employees believed or had reason to believe they were violating Medicare regulations.”  At the conclusion of the memorandum opinion, however, the Eleventh Circuit cautioned district courts against granting summary judgment in favor of a defendant solely on the ground that “a reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous regulation . . . would have permitted [a defendant’s] conduct.”  Moving forward in light of this decision, healthcare companies are advised to focus on the lack of evidence associated with a relator’s claims in order to persuade the district court that a grant for summary judgment in favor of the defendant is warranted.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bass, Berry & Sims PLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.