UPDATE: Sur-Sur-Sur Reply Highlights The Short Arm Of U.S. Law In Trade Secret Theft

by Orrick - Trade Secrets Group

https://jdsupra-html-images.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/7c134aa7-55cd-483e-9b5a-bfdf7bb9b6b5-shutterstock_77061022-200x150.jpgA few months ago, we discussed the federal government’s difficulties prosecuting foreign companies and individuals for theft of U.S. trade secrets.  We highlighted three cases in which foreign defendants effectively stalled their criminal prosecutions by challenging the government’s attempts to serve them abroad.  These cases raise the concern that complicated U.S. procedural rules are getting in the way of the government’s efforts to protect the nation from cybertheft, and allowing foreign defendants to violate U.S. law with impunity.

Since our original post, we’ve checked the dockets and have an update on what’s been going on with these criminal prosecutions.  And the answer is — absolutely nothing.

In United States v. Sinovel, a Western District of Wisconsin case, the United States filed a letter on July 8, 2013, describing in intimate detail the various methods by which it had attempted to serve process on Chinese defendant Sinovel.  These methods included:

  • Serving an individual named Zhou Zhi with a summons and complaint naming Sinovel Wind Group, Ltd. as a defendant;
  • Sending summonses via FedEx on four different occasions to the Delaware and Texas registered agents, and a Houston address, for Sinovel Wind Group (USA) Co., Ltd.; and
  • Serving copies of the various summonses on Capitol Services, Dover, Delaware.

On August 16, 2013, attorneys specially appearing for Sinovel filed a 38-page motion to quash service of process.  Sinovel’s attorneys argued, inter alia, that service on the U.S.-based subsidiary, Sinovel Wind Group (USA) Co., Ltd., does not constitute service on the Chinese parent, Sinovel Wind Group Co., Ltd.  The United States opposed Sinovel’s motion to quash, and Sinovel filed its reply on September 20, 2013.  The case is stayed pending resolution of the motion to quash.

In United States v. Kolon, an Eastern District of Virginia case, we previously reported that defendant Kolon’s motion to quash was scheduled to be heard on July 18, 2013.  Well, it was not heard on that date and the case has instead spun into a procedural black hole.  Once the matter was fully briefed, the United States requested leave to file a sur-reply, which the court granted.  Kolon then asked for leave to file a sur-sur-reply, and the court granted that request.  Then on its own initiative, the court ordered the United States to file a sur-sur-sur-reply.  The court stated that it did so because it’s the United States’ burden to demonstrate that service was properly effectuated — suggesting that the court didn’t think the United States had done so up to that point.  The government filed its sur-sur-sur-reply on August 13, 2013, and nothing has happened in the case since.  We are eagerly waiting to see if there will be a sur-sur-sur-sur-reply.

In United States v. Pangang, a Northern District of California court had granted Pangang’s motion to quash service and ordered the United States to submit a “Status Report re: decision on action to be taken” by July 18, 2013.  But on the due date, the United States instead requested an extension of time for it to file that status report.  About a month later, the government filed a request asking the court to find that it had “substantially complied” with the service requirements.  In so doing, the United States is essentially asking the court to deem its service attempts “good enough.”  It seems like this may be the government’s Hail Mary pass — if this doesn’t work then the case may be over and the China-based defendant will apparently have succeeded in avoiding prosecution even though it’s fully aware of the case and hired a top-tier law firm to make these procedural arguments on its behalf.  On August 29, 2013, the Pangang defendants opposed the government’s motion.  The court has not yet ruled.

Concerns about the United States’ practical ability to prosecute foreign trade secret thieves seem to be justified.  Each of these three criminal prosecutions has been stalled indefinitely pending the courts sorting out these service of process issues.

In the meantime, efforts to change the rules governing foreign service of process are progressing slowly.  On October 25, 2012, the Justice Department asked the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to rewrite Rule 4 governing service of process.  The Justice Committee argued that, given the new global economy, an amendment is necessary to permit effective service of summons on a foreign organization that has no agent or principal place of business within the United States.  On May 8, 2013, the Advisory Committee reported that it had created a subcommittee “for further study and report.”  The Advisory Committee has asked that the subcommittee report on its progress at the Advisory Committee meeting scheduled for October 17, 2013.

As always, Trade Secrets Watch will continue to monitor these developments and keep our readers posted.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Trade Secrets Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.