US Federal Circuit Rules That PTAB Timeliness Rulings for IPR Petitions Are Subject to Judicial Review

by Dechert LLP

Dechert LLP

In a 9-4 split, the Federal Circuit sitting en banc ruled that Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) determinations as to whether an inter partes review (IPR) petition was timely filed are reviewable on appeal, overruling a previous panel decision holding that judicial review was not available. The decision in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corp., allows patent owners to appeal PTAB determinations as to the timeliness of an IPR petition, notwithstanding that the Patent Act prohibits judicial review of PTAB decisions as to whether to institute IPR proceedings. 

Reviewability of PTAB Institution Decisions

IPR proceedings were introduced five years ago via the America Invents Act, with the idea of providing an alternative pathway for attacking patent validity that is quicker and more cost-effective than district court patent litigation. Upon receipt of a petition seeking to institute an IPR proceeding, the PTAB will only institute the proceeding if it determines that there is a reasonable likelihood that the petitioner would prevail with respect to at least one of the claims challenged in the petition. 35 U.S.C. § 314(a). The PTAB’s determination whether to institute the IPR is final and nonappealable. 35 U.S.C. § 314(d). 

An additional requirement, however, is that a party sued for patent infringement in district court and its privies have up to one year to file a petition seeking institution of IPR proceedings if they wish to collaterally attack the validity of a patent-in-suit before the PTAB. 35 U.S.C. § 315(b). 

In Wi-Fi One, Ericsson sued ten defendants for infringement of three patents in 2010, which resulted in a jury verdict of infringement. In 2013, Broadcom, which was not a party to that litigation, filed three separate IPR petitions challenging patentability of the three patents-in-suit. Wi-Fi One, which had purchased the patents from Ericsson in the interim, moved to dismiss Broadcom’s petitions on the grounds that they were time-barred under § 315(b), because Broadcom was in privity with the defendants to the litigation filed more than a year earlier. The PTAB denied the motions (on the grounds that Broadcom was not in privity with the prior litigants), instituted the requested IPR proceedings, and ultimately issued final decisions finding the challenged claims unpatentable. 

Wi-Fi One appealed to the Federal Circuit, seeking to overturn the PTAB’s timeliness determination. A three-judge panel rejected Wi-Fi One’s arguments, holding that PTAB timeliness rulings are nonreviewable in view of the provisions of § 314(d) stating that PTAB decisions whether to institute IPR proceedings are final and nonappealable. Wi-Fi One petitioned for rehearing en banc. 

Modeling its discussion after the recent Supreme Court analysis in Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee, 136 S. Ct. 2131 (2016), the full court reversed the panel, explaining that there is a “strong presumption favoring judicial review” of administrative action, such that judicial review is prohibited only based on a “clear and convincing” indication by Congress evidenced by “specific language, specific legislative history, and inferences of intent drawn from the statutory scheme as a whole.” In Cuozzo, the Supreme Court held that PTAB determinations as to whether an IPR petition had met the statutory requirement of identifying the grounds for challenging the patent with sufficient particularity as set forth in § 312(a)(3) were unreviewable on appeal, in view of § 314(d). But, the Court expressly left open the possibility of judicial review for various other types of issues, such as decisions that are not “closely related” to the merits of patentability under § 314(a), decisions that raise constitutional concerns, and decisions that exceed the agency’s authority to act. Relying on these exceptions, the Federal Circuit evaluated the statutory language and scheme to determine that timeliness determinations under § 315(b) are not “some minor statutory technicality,” but are a limit on the agency’s authority to act under the IPR scheme, and that they are not “closely related” to the Board’s determination on patentability merits under § 314(a). Finding no clear and convincing direction that Congress intended such determinations to be encompassed within § 314(d), the Court held that PTAB timeliness determinations are in fact reviewable on appeal.                     

Key Takeaways 

The implications of Wi-Fi One extend beyond the obvious result that parties may now appeal PTAB timeliness rulings. The Federal Circuit expressly noted that “we do not decide today” whether issues other than time-bar determinations under § 315(b) are also subject to appeal, which leaves litigants free to argue that other issues not directly implicated by PTAB institution decisions under § 314(a) should also be appealable. This might include, for example, decisions such as whether a petitioner has properly named all interested parties and whether estoppel bars a party from filing a petition. 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dechert LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dechert LLP

Dechert LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at:

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.