U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction but Leaves Some Questions Unanswered in Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison

by Pepper Hamilton LLP

The Supreme Court issued its decision in the closely followed case of Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. Arkison, Chapter 7 Trustee of Estate of Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc., 573 U.S. ___ (2014) (Bellingham) this morning, holding that where the Constitution bars a bankruptcy court from entering final judgment on a bankruptcy-related claim under the reasoning of Stern v. Marshall, 564 U.S. __, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011) (Stern), the court nevertheless is permitted to issue proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to be reviewed de novo by the district court, which can then enter final judgment. This significant decision fills a “statutory gap” that had been created by Stern and provides a procedure by which bankruptcy courts may adjudicate claims that they were statutorily authorized but constitutionally prohibited from handling.

In Bellingham, a Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee alleged that prior to filing for bankruptcy, the debtor, Bellingham Insurance Agency, Inc. (BIA), fraudulently conveyed certain of its assets to Executive Benefits Insurance Agency, Inc. (EBIA). The trustee filed an action asserting fraudulent conveyance claims against EBIA, which was not a creditor of BIA’s estate. The bankruptcy court granted summary judgment to the trustee and, on appeal, the district court affirmed after conducting a de novo review of the record. EBIA appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which observed that, under Stern, Article III did not permit a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment on a fraudulent conveyance claim against a noncreditor without the parties’ consent. Nevertheless, the Ninth Circuit affirmed on two alternative grounds: (i) the bankruptcy court’s adjudication of the fraudulent conveyance claim was permissible because EBIA had impliedly consented to the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction, and (ii) the bankruptcy court’s judgment could be treated as proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law that were reviewed de novo by the district court, whose affirmance was sufficient to constitute the final judgment for Article III purposes.

Stern held that Article III prohibits Congress from vesting a bankruptcy court with the authority to finally adjudicate certain claims listed as “core” claims under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b), but the Supreme Court did not address how the courts should proceed when ruling on such a claim. Stern therefore left a “statutory gap” because a Stern claim cannot be adjudicated to final judgment by the bankruptcy court, as in a typical core proceeding, but the alternative procedure, whereby the bankruptcy court submits proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, statutorily applies only to non-core claims under 28 U.S.C. § 157(c). This “gap” thereby arguably left bankruptcy courts devoid of any authority to act on Stern claims and required the district courts to hear all such claims in the first instance.

In Bellingham, the Supreme Court closed this “gap” by interpreting the plain language of the severability provision in 28 U.S.C. §151, which provides that where a “provision of th[e] Act or [its] application … is held invalid, the remainder of th[e] Act … is not affected thereby.” The Court held that when a court identifies a claim as a Stern claim, it has necessarily “held invalid” the application of Section 157(b), i.e., the “core” label and its attendant procedures, to the litigant’s claim. In such a case, to effectuate the statutory purpose, the “non-core” label and its associated procedures under Section 157(c) must apply. Assuming that the fraudulent conveyance claims at issue were Stern claims that could not be finally determined by the bankruptcy court, the Supreme Court found that the claims clearly were “related to” the bankruptcy case and, therefore, otherwise fit within the category of claims governed by Section 157(c). Thus, it was permissible for the bankruptcy court to follow the Section 157(c) procedures and submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court for de novo review. Because the district court had, in fact, engaged in a de novo review of the bankruptcy court’s order and entered its own final judgment, the Court ruled that any potential error in the bankruptcy court’s entry of final judgment had been cured.

In Bellingham, the Supreme Court authorized bankruptcy courts to provisionally adjudicate Stern claims by following the procedure established under Section 157(c), i.e., through submission of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law to the district court for de novo review and final judgment. The opinion therefore provides a clear, constitutionally acceptable procedure for handling “core” claims that cannot be finally determined by the bankruptcy court.

However, Bellingham expressly reserves and does not decide whether Article III permits a bankruptcy court to enter final judgment, subject only to appellate review, on a Stern claim with the consent of the parties. In addition, the Supreme Court noted that the district court’s de novo review concluded in a written opinion. The requirement of a de novo review could add additional expense and require more time from already busy district courts.


Written by:

Pepper Hamilton LLP

Pepper Hamilton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.