USPTO Offers Relief for COVID-Related Delays in Submitting Priority Documents

Foley & Lardner LLP
Contact

Foley & Lardner LLPOne year into the COVID-19 pandemic, and its affects still are impacting patent prosecution, especially as it relates to the difficulty of obtaining paper copies of official documents. While the USPTO rarely requires originals of executed documents, it does require certified copies of foreign priority applications. Recognizing the difficulty (or impossibility) of obtaining certified copies under present circumstances, the USPTO recently announced an option to request suspension of the requirement to file a certified copy of a foreign priority application by the time the issue fee is paid.

COVID-Related Relief from Certified Priority Document Deadline

The USPTO announcement came in a notice published on its website, not in a Federal Register Notice. The requirement to file a certified copy of a foreign priority application is based on 37 CFR § 1.55(f) and 1.55(g). The ability to request relief from the requirement to file a certified copy by the time the issue fee is paid is available only if the foreign priority application is not available via a multilateral priority document exchange program.

To be eligible to seek relief, an applicant must have requested a certified copy from the foreign intellectual property office prior to payment of the issue fee in the U.S. application at issue, but be unable to file it by the issue fee payment date “because the foreign intellectual property office was unable to process the request as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak.” The applicant also must have filed an “interim copy” (i.e., non-certified copy) of the priority application in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.55(j).

To request relief, the applicant must file “a request for suspension of the requirement for submission of the certified copy” no later than the date of payment of the issue fee, with one of two required statements, depending on whether the U.S. application is a PCT national stage application or not. For both types of applications, the applicant must state:

  • that the applicant submitted an interim copy as defined in 37 CFR l.55(j) and
  • that the applicant requested a certified copy of the foreign priority application from the foreign intellectual property office before payment of the issue fee, but was unable to file it on or before the issue fee date of payment because the foreign intellectual property office was unable to process the request as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak.

The USPTO suggests using new Form PTO/SB/453 for this purpose.

Certified Copy Still Required

Importantly, the notice states that a certified copy still must be submitted “[o]nce the foreign intellectual property office resumes processing requests for paper certified copies.”

In particular, the notice states:

Once the foreign intellectual property office resumes processing requests for paper certified copies, the patentee must:

(1) comply with the requirements of the foreign intellectual property office for obtaining a paper certified copy (which may include submitting a new request for a paper certified copy) within two months after the date the foreign intellectual property office resumes processing requests for paper certified copies; and

(2) submit the paper certified copy to the USPTO within one month after the date the paper certified copy is issued from the foreign intellectual property office.

The burden is on the patentee to ensure that the certified copy is filed within this time period.

If these requirements are met, a petition for delayed submission of a certified copy will not be required.

This means applicants who obtain relief under this program will have to monitor the status of the foreign intellectual property office and act promptly once it resumes processing requests for paper certified copies—and hope the certified copy is received promptly after it is “issued.”

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Foley & Lardner LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Foley & Lardner LLP
Contact
more
less

Foley & Lardner LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.