Washington’s Counties Face Potential Liability for Citizen’s Drunken, Reckless Driving

by Cozen O'Connor

In a case widely reported by the national media, the Washington State Supreme Court recently ruled that a governmental entity may face liability for faulty road design that leads to injuries in car crashes, even when the driver is drunk and driving recklessly.

In Lowman v. Wilbur, et al., No. 86584-1, 2013 Wash. LEXIS 618 (August 8, 2013), an eight to one decision, Washington’s highest court held that a driver’s drunkenness cannot act as a bar to a municipality, county and/or utility company’s liability for negligent road design or construction.  In so holding, the court ruled that a plaintiff need only establish that the road’s design and/or construction was negligent and was a cause in fact of his or her injuries to avoid early dismissal of the case.

In Lowman, plaintiff Nathan Lowman met Jennifer Wilbur at the Country Corner Bar and Grill. Wilbur invited Lowman to go home with her, and Lowman agreed. Despite the fact that she had been drinking, Wilbur drove.  Before they reached Wilbur’s home, she lost control of the vehicle and  hit a utility pole.  Due to the collision, Lowman sustained severe injuries to his right arm, including a permanent disfigurement.

Lowman sued Wilber, Country Corner Bar and Grill, Puget Sound Energy (PSE), and Skagit County, contending that all committed negligent acts that caused his injuries.  The evidence established that Wilbur was legally intoxicated while driving at a high rate of speed on a meandering country road, and that she lost control of her vehicle as a result, slamming into the utility pole.  In fact, Wilbur pleaded guilty to felony vehicular assault based upon the incident.  Lowman retained an expert who opined that the utility pole was less than five feet from the edge of the roadway, was dangerous, and did not comply with Skagit County utility pole placement standards.

PSE and Skagit County moved to dismiss Lowman’s claims, arguing that they should not be held liable for Lowman’s injuries because, as a matter of public policy, any connection between the PSE and Skagit County’s actions (i.e., the decision to place the pole next to the roadway) and its ultimate result (Lowman’s injuries) was “too remote or insubstantial to impose liability” where Wilbur was drunk and driving recklessly.  Notably, for the purposes of summary judgment PSE and Skagit County conceded that the pole was improperly placed and that the actual collision between the vehicle and the pole was a cause in fact of Lowman’s injuries.  The trial court granted the motion to dismiss, and Lowman appealed.

The Court of Appeals, Division One, affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of Lowman’s claims against PSE and Skagit County.  PSE and Skagit County should not, the Court of Appeals concluded, be required to protect against the consequences of criminally reckless drivers.  Because “[n]either PSE nor Skagit County did anything to precipitate the departure of Wilbur's vehicle from the roadway,” the improper placement of the utility pole was too remote from the plaintiff’s injury to warrant the imposition of liability for Lowman’s injuries on the utility and county.

The Court of Appeals decision conformed with its prior rulings in similar cases, where the Court of Appeals routinely declined to hold a municipality’s negligent road design was the legal cause of a collision where the drivers were:

  • Traveling between 49 and 63 miles per hour in a 30 mile-per-hour zone;
  • Crossing  the center line while highly intoxicated and travelling at 40 miles per hour in a 25 mile-per-hour zone; and
  • Highly intoxicated, with a blood alcohol content of at least 0.22g/100mL, and speeding.

In each prior case, the Court of Appeals concluded that as a matter of public policy, Washington’s municipalities, counties and cities should not be expected to guard against negligent driving of this magnitude.  Lowman then appealed to the Washington State Supreme Court.  Washington’s highest court reversed the decision of the Court of Appeals, and remanded the case to the trial court for further proceedings. 

In reaching its decision, the court analyzed the public policy considerations underlying the duty of care owed by a government to its citizens.  The court noted that in some cases, such as a claim against a physician for “wrongful birth"1 and claims for personal injuries attributable to the illegal sale of alcohol to minors, public policy concerns dictate that a defendant should not be permitted to avoid tort liability simply because the plaintiff cannot show that the defendants’ negligence was “too remote or insubstantial to impose liability.”  In this case, the court noted that a government entity should not be permitted to avoid tort liability for its alleged failure to properly maintain its roads and highways based upon the absence of “legal cause,” even when a motorist involved in the accident giving rise to the claim has engaged in criminally reckless behavior.  Justice Madsen, in concurrence, noted that the recent actions by the Washington legislature to make it easier for a plaintiff to bring an action for injuries sustained in a car accident where the driver as intoxicated demonstrates the influential public policy concerns upon which the decision is based. 

Moving forward, so long as a plaintiff can show that the telephone pole (or other feature of the roadway) was improperly placed or negligently constructed, and that the road’s construction actually caused the injuries, the case can proceed and should be decided by a jury.  Whatever the reasons for a car’s departure from a roadway, the court held that, “as a matter of policy” Washington Courts must “reject[s] a notion that a negligently placed utility pole cannot be a legal cause of resulting injury, as a matter of law.”  Although Justice Madsen cautions in her concurrence that the majority opinion should not be read so broadly as to impose liability on a municipality whenever the plaintiff can show a dangerous condition in the roadway that caused his injury, it is unclear how the lower courts will proceed with this new ruling in hand.  As Justice Johnson warns in his dissenting opinion, the majority seemingly ignored the “sound public policy that prevents taxpayers from insuring against the consequences of criminal behavior.”  With this ruling in hand it remains unclear whether Washington’s trial courts are ever permitted to dismiss a lawsuit at its early stages because the facts are sufficiently egregious as to demonstrate that “the consequences of criminal behavior [are] so remote as to justify foreclosure of a municipality’s liability.”

1 A tort action for “wrongful birth” commonly refers to a lawsuit brought by a child with birth defects and by their parents. Both parents and the child claim that medical malpractice, or the failure to impart material information to the parents, precluded the parents' right to an informed decision on whether to give birth to the child.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.