We've Been Charged with Sanctions – Now What?

by Sands Anderson PC

Sands Anderson PC

No one likes to see the words “Motion for Sanctions”.  Judges don’t like them; most lawyers don’t like to make them; and 100% of lawyers don’t want to be on the receiving end of them.  And I’m not talking about discovery sanctions under Rule 4:15, I’m talking about Virginia Code § 8.01-271.1 whereby a lawyer’s filing or oral motion carries with it a certification by the lawyer that…

(i) he has read the pleading, motion, or other paper,

(ii) to the best of his knowledge, information and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and

(iii) it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.

One serious issue that arises when addressing this standard – both for those attempting to prove sanctions should issue and those who argue they should not – is the issue of privilege.

The attorney-client privilege is one of the oldest common law privileges sanctioned by the courts.  Upjohn Co. v. United States, 449 U.S. 383, 389 (1981).  When it applies, the privilege is absolute and cannot be overcome, “even for the purpose of administering justice.”  Commonwealth v. Edwards, 235 Va. 499, 508-09 (1988). “[C]onfidential communications between an attorney and his or her client made in the course of that relationship and concerning the subject matter of the attorney’s representation are privileged from disclosure.”  N. Va. Real Estate, Inc. v. Martins, 283 Va. 86, 115 (2012) (quoting Walton v. Mid-Atl. Spine Specialists, P.C., 280 Va. 113, 122 (2010)).

Because of the distaste that both the bench and bar have for sanctions motions, there is scant authority on the mechanics of related proceedings. There is no rule devoted to them or set of regulations that controls.  But the Virginia Supreme Court has given trial courts and litigants some guidance on how proceedings are to be conducted.  In addressing a motion for sanctions for alleged violation of Virginia Code § 8.01-271.1, Virginia courts apply an “objective standard of reasonableness in determining whether a litigant and his attorney, after reasonable inquiry, could have formed a reasonable belief that the pleading was well grounded in fact, warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law, and not interposed for an improper purpose.”  Flippo v. CSC Assocs. III, L.L.C., 262 Va. 48, 65-66 (2001) (emphasis added); see Flora v. Shulmister, 262 Va. 215, 220 (2001).  This standard does not require the court determine whether a litigant and her attorney’s pleading was “actually warranted by existing law” or “well grounded in fact.”  Martins, 283 Va. at 107 (“trial court correctly applied an objective standard of reasonableness in concluding that the facts … could not support a reasonable belief that the plaintiffs’ claims … were well grounded in fact or law, as required by Code § 8.01-271.1.”); Flora, 262 Va. at 220 (citing Gilmore v. Finn, 259 Va. 448, 467 (2000)).  This is so because “‘[t]he wisdom of hindsight should be avoided’ in applying the appropriate objectively reasonable standard of review.”  Gilmore, 259 Va. at 467 (quotation omitted)). In essence, for a Court to make a finding that sanctions (in some form) should issue, the judge must find claims and evidence to have been so one-sided that someone on the losing end could not have been operating in good faith.  It then becomes a question of who – lawyer, client, or both is found to have violated § 8.01-271.1 and subject to sanctions.

But for the litigant who pressed for sanctions against his opponent and opposing counsel, the determination of who bears the blame is not for him to prosecute.  For example, he should not be permitted to address probing discovery to both the opponent and opposing counsel on who knew what and when in disregard of the attorney-client privilege and work product doctrine.  It is for the opponent and opposing counsel to defend themselves by arguing who, as and between them, should suffer the consequence of a meritless claim.

In sum, a trial court must make a preliminary determination of whether a sanction should issue based on the record before it.  Information regarding possible apportionment of the blame, especially including attorney-client privileged communications, is not discoverable by a party seeking to impose sanctions on an opponent or opposing lawyer under § 8.01-271.1 in light of the objective standard of reasonableness.  See Martins, 283 Va. at 114-15.  Discovery of such information only comes into play once a violation of § 8.01-271.1 is found against both the party and her attorney for which they would be jointly and severally liable.  Id.  If that were the case, it might be necessary for the party and her attorney to discover privileged information to seek allocation of fault – but this discovery is not available to the party who prevailed on the sanctions motion.  Id.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sands Anderson PC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Sands Anderson PC

Sands Anderson PC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.