Weekly Law Resume - August 1, 2013: Homeowners Associations – Equal Access Requirements For Elections

by Low, Ball & Lynch

Paul Wittenberg et al. v. Beachwalk Homeowners Association
Court of Appeal, Fourth District (June 26, 2013)

California Civil Code sections 1363.03(a)(1) and (a)(2) require that in an election, homeowners associations provide equal access to “any candidates or member advocating a point of view” and equal access to common area meeting space, respectively. This case considers whether these provisions apply when a board of directors uses its own media to endorse a viewpoint, as well as when there are multiple elections on the same issue.

The Beachwalk Homeowners Association (“HOA”) consists of homeowners in a 453 unit community in Huntington Beach, CA. The Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (“CC&R’s”) of the HOA required that any alterations to common areas of the community that cost more than $1,000 required approval of at least two-thirds of the voting members. In October, 2010, members of the HOA sued the Board of Directors, alleging that the Board had removed a swimming pool without obtaining the required two-thirds vote and that the Board was threatening to remove two more swimming pools. In November, 2010, a preliminary injunction was granted that prevented the Board from removing any swimming pools without the required two-thirds vote.

Instead of instituting an election to obtain the two-thirds vote to remove the remaining swimming pools, the Board attempted to amend the CC&R’s to increase the dollar threshold for triggering a vote, and to reduce the number of votes required for approval of expenditures. The Board sent a ballot and cover letter announcing the election, scheduled for December, 2010. The cover letter contained language supporting the Board’s position that the CC&R’s were overbroad and needed amendment. Also accompanying the letter was a one-page attachment entitled the “Case for amending the CC&Rs.” The Board specifically decided not to include any opposition material with this mailing.

Soon after this, an HOA member requested the use of the clubhouse for a “town hall meeting” supporting other candidates for the Board who opposed amending the CC&R’s. The member paid a $200 cleaning deposit, but believed he did not have to pay the usual $90 rental fee for the clubhouse because of the equal access provision of Section 1363.03(a)(2). However, the member was notified by the community manager that the Board had rejected the request to use the clubhouse for free, and the member subsequently paid the $90 fee.

At the December, 2010 election, there were insufficient votes cast, so the Board scheduled another election for April, 2011 and again sent ballots and voting material to all members, including a two-page letter nearly identical to the letter sent before the previous election supporting the Board’s position. Additionally, in a February, 2011 issue of the HOA newsletter, the Board included a section arguing in support of amending the CC&R’s. The content of the HOA newsletter was entirely drafted by the Board each month, and the Board refused the request of a member who wished to write a section opposed to the amendment.

At around the same time, another member opposed to the amendment requested the use of an outside common area for the purposes of a political rally. The request was denied by the Board with the Board giving no reason for the denial.

As with the December, 2010 election, there were not enough votes cast at the April, 2011 election. The Board extended the voting another week, and ultimately met its target goal of votes cast and of required “yes” votes and petitioned the Court for amendment of the CC&R’s. Two homeowners filed suit seeking to invalidate the election based on alleged violation of fair access rules under the Davis-Stirling Act. The trial court found in favor of the defendant HOA, holding that: (1) the HOA’s election rules were in compliance with section 1363.03; (2) the equal-access requirement concerning points of view contained in section 1363.03(a)(1) was inapplicable based on the clear language of the statute; and (3) there was no violation of the free access to common areas required under section 1363.03(a)(2). The plaintiffs appealed the second and third of the court’s rulings.

On Appeal, the Court of Appeal reversed, finding that the Association had violated Civil Code Sections 1363.03(a)(1) and (a)(2). The Court concluded that, under 1363.03(a)(1), the Board and its members should not be treated differently than any other members of the HOA. Therefore, by using its own media to endorse a particular viewpoint, which it did repeatedly in the newsletter and in the materials accompanying the ballots, the Board subjected itself to the provisions of subdivision (a)(1). The Court found that it was undisputed that board members were “members” of the HOA and that, when enacting the statute, the Legislature was particularly concerned that opposing viewpoints other than those of the Board be heard. Furthermore, the Court held that a “plain English” definition of the term advocacy encompasses the actions of the Board in using its own media to further its position. Thus, having engaged in advocacy and being members of the HOA, the Board was required to permit other members of the HOA equal access to this media. Since the evidence established that the Board, on at least one occasion, refused to print an article opposing the amendments in the newsletter, the Board’s action violated subdivision (a)(1).

The Court then turned to section 1363.03(a)(2). The Court looked to the text of subdivision (a)(2) which applies to any “campaign…for purposes reasonably related to the election.” The Court determined the term “campaign” to be broader than a single election in this particular instance. Indeed, The Court noted the somewhat unique facts of the Board holding multiple elections in short succession and even tying the elections together by stating that elections would continue to be held until the amendment passed. Consequently, the Court found that the “campaign” encompassed all three elections. Therefore, because of the evidence that a member was forced to pay to use the clubhouse for a “town hall meeting” before the December, 2010 election and another member was refused permission to use an outdoor common area for a political rally before the April, 2011 election, there existed sufficient evidence that subdivision (a)(2) had been violated.

Finally, the court noted that under section 1363.09, a violation of election rules in 1363.03 “may” result in voiding the election, but the statute it did not say that it “shall” result in a voiding of the election. Hence, although the judgment was reversed, the case was sent back to the trial court for consideration of whether the results of the election should be voided.


This case confirms that if an HOA or its Board take any position at all in favor of or against a particular issue in an election, they will need to be careful to assure that equal access to opposing viewpoints are given, or risk voiding any election.

For a copy of the complete decision see:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Low, Ball & Lynch | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Low, Ball & Lynch

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.