Weekly Law Resume: Insurance Coverage–Right to Jury Trial on Declaratory Relief

by Low, Ball & Lynch

[author: David Blinn]

Allen M. Entin v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles
Court of Appeal, Second District (August 20, 2012)

Courts have frequently characterized declaratory relief actions as being equitable in nature. Despite this, cases diverge on whether either party has a right to a jury trial in such an action. This case considered whether an insured had a right to a jury trial in a declaratory relief action over disability benefits where the carrier disputed coverage but continued to pay the benefits.

Allen Entin (“Entin”) was an OB/GYN physician. In 1991, he purchased a disability income policy from Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (“Provident”) providing benefits of $20,000 per month in the event he became totally disabled. He also purchased an “overhead expense” disability policy from the same carrier providing benefits of up to $360,000 in the event he became totally disabled. Both the Provident policies defined the term “totally disabled” to mean “(1) [the insured is] not able to perform the substantial and material duties of [his] occupation; and  (2) [the insured is] receiving care by a physician which is appropriate for the condition causing the disability.”

On September 3, 2009, Entin filed a claim alleging that migraine headaches rendered him incapable of performing the substantial and material duties of his occupation. Provident reviewed the claim and began paying him benefits under a reservation of rights. Provident conducted a medical examination of Entin, reviewed his medical records and interviewed his physicians, and came to the conclusion that he was not totally disabled within the meaning of the policies and also that there were “substantial questions” as to whether Entin was receiving “appropriate care” for his condition as contractually required under the policies. Provident filed a complaint for declaratory relief over those issues, and clarified that it would continue to pay on the claim until the declaratory relief claim was resolved, and that it would not attempt to recoup any sums paid prior to entry of judgment.

In February of 2012, after the parties had briefed the issue, the trial court ruled that Entin did not have a right to a trial by jury “in light of the fact that payments [under the policies] are ongoing.” Entin filed a petition for writ of mandate to overturn the trial court ruling on the jury trial issue.

The Court of Appeal granted the petition for writ of mandate. It held that Entin was entitled to a jury trial on the declaratory relief dispute over the coverage under Provident’s policies. Initially, the Court noted that in determining whether an action was one triable by a jury at common law, the court is not bound by the form of the action, but rather by the nature of the rights involved, and the facts of the particular case – the gist of the action. A jury trial must be granted where the gist of the action is legal, where the action is one at law. On the other hand, where the action is essentially one in equity, and the relief sought depends upon the application of equitable doctrines, the parties are not entitled to a jury trial.

The Court next noted that although declaratory relief actions are often characterized as “equitable” in nature, they may in fact raise either legal or equitable issues. Here, Provident’s complaint did not raise any dispute regarding the proper construction of the parties’ insurance policies. Instead, it sought a determination as to whether Entin was “totally disabled” within the meaning of those policies. To resolve this issue, the trier of fact would have to decide whether Entin’s migraine headaches rendered him “unable to perform the substantial and material duties of his occupation,” and whether he was receiving “appropriate care for the condition.”

The Court held that the rights involved were legal in nature, and did not depend upon the application of equitable doctrines. The court also noted that normally, the question of whether a person was totally disabled, under the rule and terms of a policy, is a question of fact for a jury to decide.

The Court disagreed with Provident that because it was continuing to pay benefits and no monetary damages were being sought (or could be sought by Entin), there was no right to a jury trial. The Court noted that while mode of relief is a “factor” in assessing whether there is a right to a jury trial, it is not “determinative.” Provident’s declaratory relief action involved the resolution of disputed factual issues regarding Entin’s entitlement to contract benefits. Entin was entitled to have these “pure issues of fact” determined by a jury.

The Court of Appeal granted the petition for writ of mandate, and directed the trial court to vacate the order denying the request for a jury trial and to issue a new order granting the request.


This case offers a good explanation of the determination courts make as to whether a party is entitled to a jury trial over issues raised in a declaratory relief action. Ultimately, the courts will look to the gist of the action, to determine if there is a right to jury trial. Where, as here, there are pure issues of fact in dispute, a right to trial by jury will exist.

For a copy of the complete decision see:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Low, Ball & Lynch | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Low, Ball & Lynch

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.