Weekly Law Resume - January 2014: Torts – Defamation and the Anti-Slapp Statute

by Low, Ball & Lynch

Anthony K. Hui v. Beth Sturbaum
Court of Appeal, First Appellate District (January 9, 2014)

California’s anti-SLAPP statute (Code of Civil Procedure §425.16) was passed in 1992 because of the legislature’s concerns about “a disturbing increase in lawsuits brought primarily to chill the valid exercise of the constitutional rights of freedom of speech and petition for the redress of grievances.” The purpose of the statute was to allow a special motion to dismiss an action involving issues of protected free speech. This case considered the extent to which an insurance investigator’s discussions with a personal injury attorney about the treating chiropractor were the proper subject of a motion to strike the chiropractor’s defamation claims.

In November, 2010, chiropractor Anthony K. Hui (“Dr. Hui”) sued Beth Sturbaum (“Sturbaum”) for defamation, trade libel, libel per se and slander. Sturbaum was an insurance company claims investigator for Federated Mutual Insurance Company. She handled liability claims submitted to Federated and often read alerts posted by the National Insurance Crime Bureau (“NICB”) regarding potential fraudulent claims practices. While investigating a claim, Sturbaum reviewed billing invoices for chiropractic services by Dr. Hui provided to two claimants who had been in an automobile accident. She noted that services described on the invoices violated the Business and Professions Code and California regulations governing chiropractors. She also learned that the claimants’ attorney was being investigated by the NICB, and that Dr. Hui had prior chiropractic license suspensions and a revocation.

Sturbaum called Dr. Hui and expressed concern that the automobile collision in which the claimants had been injured was relatively minor, and that Dr. Hui’s services may be excessive. Sturbaum also called an assistant to the claimants’ attorney, Winnie Yu, and stated that the billings were “excessive because of the type of impact” in the car accident and that the billings “could be fraudulent.” Sturbaum mentioned that she made, or was going to make, a complaint about Dr. Hui. In 2010, the California Department of Insurance (“DOI”) informed Sturbaum that it was investigating Dr. Hui “for potential fraudulent activity” and asked her to provide information. She cooperated with the investigation and provided the requested information. Dr. Hui soon after learned about the DOI investigation.

Dr. Hui filed suit against Sturbaum and claimed that Sturbaum submitted false reports to the DOI and told personal injury attorneys not to send their clients to him. Sturbaum moved to strike the complaint and argued that it arose out of protected speech. The trial court granted Sturbaum’s motion and found that her communications with the DOI were absolutely privileged, and Sturbaum’s communications to Ms. Yu were not made with malice such as to defeat a qualified privilege.

The Court of Appeal affirmed after reviewing the case de novo. Dr. Hui only appealed the trial court’s finding with regard to Sturbaum’s communications with Ms. Yu. In an unpublished section of its opinion, the Court agreed that Sturbaum’s statements to the DOI were absolutely privileged under Civil Code § 47. In the published opinion, the Court held that Sturbaum’s statements to Ms. Yu were protected under Civil Code § 47(c), which provides a conditional privilege for “communications to interested persons” made without malice. As such, the Court found that Sturbaum’s statements to Ms. Yu were made “in connection with a public issue or an issue of public interest.” It noted that the business of insurance, and the issue of insurance fraud, impact most consumers of insurance and are a concern to a substantial number of people. The Court thus concluded that there was a sufficient “degree of closeness between the challenged statements and the asserted public interest” of preventing insurance fraud. On the other hand, Dr. Hui had not established a probability of prevailing pursuant to the Anti-SLAPP statute because he did not rebut the Court’s finding of a privilege, and did not meet his burden of showing that the statements were made with malice, hatred, ill will or in reckless disregard of Dr. Hui’s rights.


This chiropractor’s defamation lawsuit against an insurance investigator failed and was subject to an Anti-SLAPP motion because the investigator’s statements regarding fraud investigation were protected. The investigator’s speech was privileged because she complied with the duty to report suspected fraud to the DOI under Insurance Code § 1872.4, and alerted an interested third party that the chiropractor may have been engaging in excessive or fraudulent billing.

For a copy of the complete decision see:


Written by:

Low, Ball & Lynch

Low, Ball & Lynch on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.