What You Need to Know About Mergers and Acquisitions Involving Government Contractors and Their Suppliers: Volume IX – Unclassified Contracts? Foreign Buyers Still Make a Difference

by Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Volume IX – Unclassified Contracts?  Foreign Buyers Still Make a Difference

Last month, we discussed the extent to which a foreign buyer can introduce an unacceptable level of foreign ownership, control, or influence (“FOCI”) that, absent mitigation, will render the target ineligible for the facility security clearances needed to perform classified work. This month, we look at foreign ownership through a broader lens.  Specifically, we consider how the United States regulates the proposed acquisition of a U.S. business by a foreign interest, irrespective of whether classified contracts and classified information may be involved in the planned transfer.

Since 1988, the evaluation of foreign investments in the United States has been conducted under the auspices of the so-called “Exon-Florio” provisions of the Defense Production Act.  As implemented, Exon-Florio establishes a process for the “voluntary” submission of information relating to “covered transactions” and a three-step review process that is administered principally by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), an interagency organization created by Executive Order in 1975.  CFIUS labored in relative obscurity until Exon-Florio infused it with a critical oversight role regarding trillions of dollars of inbound foreign investment.

In a nutshell, once a voluntary submission of a “covered transaction” is “accepted” by CFIUS:

  • CFIUS has 30 days to conduct a review. If CFIUS elects not to conduct an “investigation,” the Exon-Florio process is concluded.
  • Any “investigation” that the Committee undertakes must be initiated no later than the end of the initial 30-day review period, and must be concluded within 45 days. All transactions that could result in control of a U.S. business by a foreign government or by someone controlled by, or acting on behalf of, a foreign government will automatically be subjected to the 45-day investigation.
  • At the conclusion of the “investigation,” CFIUS can either conclude the matter without action or file a report with the President. The report may provide for any of three outcomes, e., (1) a recommendation for the suspension or prohibition of the transaction, (2) an inability of the Committee to reach a conclusion, or (3) a request the President make the determination with respect to the permissibility of the transaction.
  • The President makes any such determination within 15 days of the completion of the investigation.

These timeframes are set forth in the regulations, but they should not be regarded as immutable.  CFIUS has the authority to reject a submission or to suspend the process for any of a number of reasons, including the failure of a party making the submission promptly to provide additional information requested by the Committee.  If one of the conditions of closing for the deal is the conclusion of the CFIUS process without action, a suspension or rejection of the submission will obviously throw a healthy dose of “cold water” on the parties’ anticipated closing date.

So far, we have outlined a process and thrown a fair amount of jargon on the table, including “CFIUS” and “covered transaction.”  What are these?

As noted above, CFIUs is an interagency organization, each member of which will approach its role in the evaluation of a proposed transaction from its own institutional slant.  It is important to recognize this, because any one voting member of CFIUS can trigger a 45-day investigation.  The members of CFIUS are:

  • The Department of the Treasury, which serves as the chair
  • The Department of Justice
  • The Department of Homeland Security
  • The Department of Commerce
  • The Department of Defense
  • The Department of State
  • The Department of Energy
  • The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative
  • The Office of Science & Technology Policy

Other offices participate, as appropriate, i.e., OMB, the Council of Economic Advisors, the National Security Council, the National Economic Council, and the Homeland Security Council.  Ex officio members include the Director of National Intelligence and the Secretary of Labor.

The CFIUS process applies only to “covered transactions.”  Just what are these “covered transactions”?  The regulations identify four categories of such transactions:

  • Transactions that result, or could result, in control of a S. business by a foreign person
  • Transactions in which a foreign person conveys its control of a S. business to another foreign person
  • Transactions that result, or could result, in control by a foreign person of any part of an entity or of assets, if that part of the entity or those assets constitute a U.S. business
  • A joint venture if one or more of the members contributes a U.S. business and a foreign person could control the U.S. business through the joint venture

Each of the highlighted terms is specifically defined in the regulations, and those definitions are accompanied by raft of illustrative “Examples” that, in contrast to many federal regulations, actually do provide useful guidance to buyers and sellers.  Among the key elements of some of these defined terms are the following:

  • A “transaction” includes not only a merger, consolidation, or acquisition of an ownership interest, but also, the acquisition or conversion of convertible voting instruments, the acquisition of voting proxies, the creation of a joint venture, and long term leases under which the lessor makes virtually all of the business decisions concerning operation of the leased business.
  • “Control” can be direct or indirect, can be exercised or exercisable, whether through ownership of a majority or dominant minority interest in voting shares, board membership, proxy voting, or contract arrangements, whether formal or informal, to “determine, direct, take, reach, or cause decisions” regarding a host of business decisions, ranging from sale of the business to changes in the production, operational and/or R&D facilities of the business; entry into new lines of business; and policy-making regarding the treatment of proprietary information.
  • A “U.S. business” is any entity (another defined term) engaged in interstate commerce in the United States, irrespective of the nationality of its ownership, “but only to the extent of its activities in interstate commerce.”
  • A “foreign person” is a foreign national, a foreign government, or a “foreign entity,” which includes any “entity” organized under the laws of a foreign state if either (a) its principal place of business is outside the United States, or (b) its shares are traded primarily on foreign exchanges, unless (c) a majority equity interest is “ultimately” owned by S. nationals (yet another defined term).

Now that we have “clarified” all of this, just what is it about a “covered transaction” that CFIUS evaluates?  Well, the basic purpose of Exon-Florio is to determine whether there is credible evidence that a foreign person exercising control over a U.S. business might take action that threatens the national security of the United States.  Not surprisingly, the regulations have never defined “national security, affording CFIUS and the President maximum flexibility in evaluating transactions.  This flexibility most dramatically manifested itself in the enactment of legislation and the amendment of the CFIUS regulations following 9/11 and the subsequent proposed acquisition in 2006 of P&O Ports (a U.K. company with operations in U.S. ports) by Dubai Ports World.  As a result, the regulations now specifically define and require voluntary submissions to the Committee to include information relating to “critical technologies” and “critical infrastructure.”  The former includes articles and services listed on the U.S. Munitions List found in the ITAR, certain items controlled by the Export Administration Regulations, atomic energy and nuclear energy-related equipment, parts, software, facilities, and materials, and selected toxins and biological agents.  The latter can be “physical or virtual” and would seem to be broad enough to encompass systems and assets such as electrical grids, water systems, and communications networks.

CFIUS is not a pro-business rubber stamp for covered transactions.  During the past decade, approximately 40% of all submitted transactions have been subjected to a “Step 2” investigation and some 7% of the submissions have been withdrawn without refiling, which is a good indication that the transaction ran into difficulties before the Committee. In 2014 – the year for which the most recent data is available – CFIUS required legally binding “mitigation measures” in connection with its disposition of nine (9) transactions, representing six percent (6%) of all submittals.  In the three-year period from 2012 to 2014, that percentage was eight percent (8%). Between 2009 and 2014, however, only two (2) of 627 filings resulted in a Presidential decision regarding the transaction.

Of covered transactions submitted for CFIUS review between 2012 and 2014, 68 involved a buyer from China, 45 from the United Kingdom, 37 from Japan, 40 from Canada, and 21 from France.  Other double digit filings originated from Germany (17), the Netherlands, Mexico, and Switzerland (15 each), Singapore (11), and South Korea and Israel (10 each).  For 2014, the leading acquirer of “critical technology” companies hailed from the UK (22), with all other nationalities in the single digits (Canada led this group with 9).  The principal focus of these transactions was the Information Technology and Electronics Sectors, with Materials and Semiconductors close on their heels.


Successful completion of the CFIUS process allows transactions to close free of the uncertainty that would attend a completed transaction not submitted for Committee review.  Under the regulations, if CFIUS advises a party that it has concluded its action with respect to a particular transaction, then the authority of the Committee and/or the President to take action with respect to the transaction “shall not be exercised.”  31 C.F.R. § 800.601(a).

Yes, foreign ownership matters, on many levels, even when classified information is not in issue.  And the finality that a successful CFIUS filing provides can put that issue in the rear view mirror.

Written by:

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.