When Is Harassment Not Harassment? Guidance From The EAT

by Dentons
Contact

Dentons

In the case of Baker v. Peninsula Business Service Limited [2017] UKEAT/0241/16, the EAT confirmed that an individual cannot succeed in a claim for disability harassment, unless they first prove that they have that protected characteristic.

The facts

Mr Baker was employed by Peninsula Business Service Limited (Peninsula) to provide legal advice and representation at employment tribunal hearings. From time to time, he handled cases privately, with Peninsula's prior permission. In 2014, Mr Baker told his managers that he was dyslexic, that as a result it took him longer than normal to do certain things (and so he might not be able to cover a specific case), and that he had medical evidence to show his dyslexia was a learning disability. This was supported by occupational health advice obtained by Peninsula, although Peninsula did not accept that Mr Baker was disabled.

Peninsula's director of legal services suspected that Mr Baker was "moonlighting", not working for Peninsula when he should have been, and/or attempting to set up in business privately. She ordered covert surveillance of Mr Baker to take place over a five-day period. The surveillance did not show that Mr Baker had been moonlighting, but did show that he had been spending time at his mother's house when he should have been performing work for Peninsula.

Peninsula invited Mr Baker to a disciplinary hearing, informed him that they had undertaken covert surveillance and provided him with a copy of the surveillance report. Mr Baker stated that knowledge of the surveillance had given him, amongst other things, sleepless nights and a sense of paranoia which were preventing him from concentrating on his duties, as a result of which he needed to go on sick leave. Mr Baker brought claims for disability harassment and victimisation based on the surveillance (which he said arose as a result of three protected acts). This included a claim that he had been victimised by the surveillance company, and that Peninsula was liable for this. Although Peninsula had not admitted disability, the tribunal did not make a finding on the issue. However, the tribunal found for Mr Baker in relation to both the harassment and victimisation complaints (including the claim for victimisation based on the actions of the surveillance company).

Peninsula appealed on the grounds that a claim for harassment could only succeed if Mr Baker was in fact found to be a disabled person for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (the Act). It was not enough that Mr Baker had asserted that he was a disabled person. Peninsula acknowledged that there were exceptions to the requirement to prove disability in order to bring a discrimination claim, but was of the opinion that no such exceptions applied here.

The decision

The EAT allowed the appeal. In respect to the harassment claim it commented that if the Act applied to individuals simply on the basis that they believed themselves to be disabled, this would allow an individual to claim harassment on the grounds of a false assertion, made in bad faith, that they have a disability. This could not have been intended and is contrary to the express wording of the Act.

The EAT also found that the tribunal had erred in allowing Mr Baker's victimisation claim, as it had not made the findings of fact necessary to properly reach the conclusion that he had been victimised. With regards to the complaint about the surveillance company's actions in putting Mr Baker under surveillance, the EAT found that Peninsula could only be held liable for the acts of the surveillance company, as its agent, if the agent had itself been in breach of the Act. On the facts the surveillance company knew nothing about the protected acts alleged by Mr Baker, and so it could not have subjected Mr Baker to surveillance because of those acts and accordingly could not have committed victimisation. As the surveillance company had not committed an act of victimisation, it followed that Peninsula could not be liable for such an act.

What is the practical impact of this for employers?

This case highlights the importance of the requirement to establish disability in order to bring a successful disability discrimination claim. The EAT's findings seem obvious on a literal interpretation of the Act (and, as Mr Baker was apparently an employment law expert himself, it is surprising that he pleaded the claims in the way that he did). However, employers should remember that case law has established certain circumstances where individuals can bring a claim for discrimination or harassment where they do not themselves have a protected characteristic. This includes, for example, where an individual is subjected to conduct related to a protected characteristic that they are wrongly perceived to have; and where an individual closely associated with someone with a protected characteristic suffers harassment related to that protected characteristic (even if they do not share it). Employers should be wary of this when dealing with employees to whom such circumstances might apply.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dentons | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Dentons
Contact
more
less

Dentons on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.