White House Proposes Overhaul of NEPA Regulations

Perkins Coie

Taking the next step in its efforts to streamline the environmental review process for projects under federal jurisdiction, the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) published proposed regulations on January 10 that would revamp the rules implementing the National Environmental Policy Act. NEPA (43 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4347) applies to a host of projects, programs, and activities that involve federal participation or approval, mandating that federal agencies fully consider the potential environmental consequences of their proposed actions before making a final decision. CEQ regulations apply to all federal agencies, although many agencies supplement these regulations with their own rules or guidance.

As NEPA turns 50 years old, the new rules—if finalized as proposed—would be the first comprehensive overhaul of the statute’s implementing regulations since they were adopted in 1978. Since their enactment, NEPA and the CEQ regulations have been a source of friction between proponents and critics of the federal environmental review process. Hundreds of court cases have interpreted the statute and regulations.

The proposed rules are controversial and wide-ranging, and have significant ramifications for many types of actions that are carried out by the federal government, receive federal funding, or require a permit or other approval from a federal agency. CEQ published an advanced notice for the proposed rules in June 2018, requesting input on a variety of issues concerning how the current regulations should be revised. The agency received over 12,500 comments. Thousands of additional comments are anticipated before the public review period concludes on March 10, 2020. If CEQ adopts the new rules as a final set of regulations, it is certain that numerous stakeholders, such as environmental groups, will challenge the regulations in court.

In summary, the proposed rules:

  • Shift the emphasis of the NEPA regulations toward procedural efficiency and predictability, while narrowing consideration of potential environmental impacts.
  • Encourage agencies to identify circumstances that could obviate the need to apply NEPA to a proposed action, such as insufficient federal control over a non-federal project or conflicting requirements under another law.
  • Strengthen the scoping process, which is used to delimit the environmental issues to be analyzed, and allow agencies to begin this process earlier on in the NEPA review.
  • Consolidate multiple agency reviews into a single NEPA document and project approval.
  • Eliminate the requirement that NEPA reviews consider the cumulative impacts of a proposed action in light of the effects of other activities, instead mandating consideration only of the action’s “reasonably foreseeable” impacts.
  • Limit the number and scope of “reasonable alternatives” that must be evaluated by, for example, excluding alternatives beyond the agency’s jurisdiction and, for non-federal projects, alternatives that do not meet the goals of the project applicant.
  • Establish presumptive time limits for the completion of the NEPA process and presumptive page limits for environmental documents.
  • Allow a project proponent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) when federal agency approval is required for a non-federal project.
  • Encourage agencies to exempt actions from more detailed environmental review through expanded use of categorical exclusions.
  • Modernize the means of public engagement in the NEPA process by greater use of contemporary technology, and clarify the obligations of commenting parties and of agencies in responding to comments.

This update explains the key components of the proposed rules, with citations to the revisions to 40 C.F.R. parts 1500–1508. The update concludes by highlighting the implications of the proposed rules for the NEPA review process. We will continue to closely monitor any new developments on the CEQ rules; explore in depth the potential ramifications of the rules, if enacted; and identify key questions and topics that may warrant comments on the proposed rules.

Key Components of the Proposed NEPA Regulations

Introductory Purpose and Policy

The existing regulations emphasize that NEPA is an “action-forcing” statute that requires federal agencies to “take actions that protect, restore and enhance the environment,” and that the purpose of an EIS is to ensure that NEPA’s environmental goals and policies are “infused into the ongoing programs and actions of the federal government.” The introductory provisions of the proposed rules remove this text, emphasizing instead that NEPA is a “procedural statute” and that its requirements are satisfied “if Federal agencies have considered relevant environmental information and the public has been informed regarding the decision-making process.” (Sections 1500.1(a), 1502.1)

Applicability of NEPA

The proposed rules instruct federal agencies to assess as a threshold matter whether NEPA applies to a proposed action. (Section 1501.1) Under the proposed rules, NEPA review is not required for:

  • Actions that are excluded from the definition of “major Federal action,” such as: (1) “non-Federal projects with minimal funding or minimal Federal involvement where the agency cannot control the outcome of the project”; (2) “non-discretionary decisions made in accordance with the agency’s statutory authority or activities that do not result in final agency action”; and (3) “loans, loan guarantees, or other forms of financial assistance where the Federal agency does not exercise significant control and responsibility over the effects of the action.” (Sections 1501.1(a)(1), 1508.1(q))
  • A wholly or partly non-discretionary action for which “the agency lacks authority to consider environmental effects as part of its decision-making process.” (Section 1501.1(a)(2))
  • An action for which compliance with NEPA “would clearly and fundamentally conflict with the requirements of another statute.” (Section 1501.1(a)(3))
  • An action for which NEPA compliance “would be inconsistent with Congressional intent due to the requirements of another statute.” (Section 1501.1(a)(4))
  • An action for which the function of NEPA compliance is served by “other analyses or processes under other statutes.” (Section 1501.1(a)(5))

Agencies may make this threshold determination either in their NEPA procedures or on an individual project basis. (Section 1501.1(b))


Scoping represents the beginning of the process for the EIS and is used to engage interested parties and agencies to define the environmental issues to be evaluated. The proposed rules eliminate the existing requirement that an agency may not start the scoping process until it first publishes a notice of intent (NOI) indicating that an EIS will be prepared. Instead, the proposed rules allow agencies to start the scoping process “as soon as the proposal for action is sufficiently developed for agency consideration.” (Section 1501.9(a)) CEQ explains that these revisions are intended to avoid “the artificial distinction between scoping and pre-scoping.”

The proposed rules further instruct agencies to publish the NOI “as soon as practicable after determining that a proposal is sufficiently developed to allow for meaningful public comment and requires an [EIS].” (Section 1501.9(d)) The NOI must include a variety of additional details, including the purpose and need for the proposed action, a brief summary of expected impacts, anticipated permits and other authorizations, a schedule for the decision-making process, and a specific request for comments on potential alternatives and impacts. (Section 1501.9(d))

Multiple Agency Approvals

The proposed rules provide that where a proposed action requires review by more than one federal agency, to the extent practicable, all of the federal agencies involved must evaluate the proposal in a single EIS and issue a joint record of decision (ROD), or in a single environmental assessment (EA) and finding of no significant impact (FONSI), depending on which level of review the lead agency determines is appropriate. (Section 1501.7(g)) According to CEQ, these changes are motivated by the administration’s “One Federal Decision” policy to ensure coordinated and timely reviews.

The lead agency must determine the purpose and need for the proposed action and the alternatives to be evaluated in consultation with cooperating agencies. (Section 1501.7(h)) The lead agency also must develop a schedule with milestones for all the environmental reviews and project authorizations. (Section 1501.7(i)) If a milestone is missed, the matter must be elevated within the responsible agencies “for timely resolution.” (Sections 1501.7(j), 1501.8(b)(6)) Cooperating agencies are charged with meeting the lead agency’s schedule and must limit their comments on the lead agency’s NEPA review to those matters where they have jurisdiction by law or special expertise concerning the environmental issues. (Section 1501.8(b)(7))

Environmental Impact Statements

The proposed rules make a number of significant revisions to the requirements for preparing an EIS. The most notable revisions are:

  • The assessment of whether a project’s impacts are significant, and thus whether to prepare an EIS, is based on “the potentially affected environment and the degree of the effects of the action.” This revision substantially simplifies the requirements in the existing regulations, which define “significantly” in terms of the project’s “context” and 10 enumerated factors of “intensity.” This revision also eliminates the references in the existing rules to impacts on “society as a whole” and “the world as a whole,” and instead focuses on “the affected area (national, regional, or local).” (Section 1501.3(b))
  • An EIS cannot be more than 150 pages (or 300 pages for proposed actions of “unusual scope or complexity”) or take more than 2 years to complete (as measured from the date the NOI is published to the date of the ROD). These page and time limits can be exceeded only when a “senior agency official” provides written approval and sets new limits. (Sections 1502.7, 1501.10(b)(2)) The existing rules state only that an EIS must “normally” meet the page limits and that, while agencies are encouraged to set time limits on a case-by-case basis, “prescribed universal time limits for the entire NEPA process are too inflexible.”
  • A private project applicant may prepare an EIS, so long as the responsible federal official provides guidance, participates in its preparation, independently evaluates it prior to approval, and takes responsibility for its scope and content. (Section 1506.5(c)) The existing rules authorize this practice only for EAs and specify that an EIS must be prepared directly by the lead agency or its contractor (or where appropriate, by a cooperating agency). The proposed rules also eliminate the requirement that a contractor preparing an EIS certify that it has no financial or other interest in the outcome of the project.
  • The proposed rules eliminate the requirement to consider “direct,” “indirect,” and “cumulative” effects. Instead, an EIS need only evaluate the “effects” of the action, which are defined to include only those impacts “that are reasonably foreseeable and have a reasonably close relationship to the proposed action or the alternatives.” Under the proposed rules, a “but for” causal relationship “is insufficient to make an agency responsible for a particular effect under NEPA.” Similarly, effects “should not be considered significant if they are remote in time, geographically remote, or the product of a lengthy causal chain.” The definition also excludes “effects that the agency has no ability to prevent due to its limited statutory authority or would occur regardless of the proposed action.” Lastly, an “[a]nalysis of cumulative effects is not required.” (Section 1508.1(g), (aa))
  • When the agency has a statutory duty to review an application to authorize a non-federal project (such as issuance of a permit), the purpose and need of the proposed action must be based on “the goals of the applicant and the agency’s authority.” (Section 1502.13)
  • An EIS must “[e]valuate reasonable alternatives to the proposed action.” (Section 1502.14) “Reasonable alternatives” are defined as “a reasonable range of alternatives that are technically and economically feasible, meet the purpose and need for the proposed action, and, where applicable, meet the goals of the applicant.” (Section 1508.1(z)) The proposed rules eliminate the requirement that a lead agency consider reasonable alternatives not within its jurisdiction. The proposed rules also eliminate the text requiring an EIS to examine “all” reasonable alternatives. As CEQ explains, “an EIS need not include every available alternative where the consideration of a spectrum of alternatives allows for the selection of any alternative within that spectrum. The reasonableness of the analysis of alternatives in a final EIS is resolved not by any particular number of alternatives considered, but by the nature of the underlying agency action.”
  • The proposed rules clarify that agencies “are not required to undertake new scientific and technical research to inform their analysis,” and “may make use of any reliable data sources, such as remotely gathered information or statistical models.” (Section 1502.24) Further, an agency must obtain relevant information only if it is essential to a reasoned choice among alternatives and the overall costs of getting the information are not “unreasonable.” (Section 1502.22)
  • “Where applicable,” the discussion of environmental consequences must include “economic and technical considerations, including the economic benefits of the proposed action.” (Section 1502.16(a)(10))
  • The cover of the EIS must include the estimated total cost of preparing the EIS. (Section 1502.11(g))
  • An EIS may be published and transmitted electronically (unless a paper copy is requested due to economic or other hardship). (Section 1502.21)

Comments on an Environmental Impact Statement

The proposed rules establish new requirements for comments submitted on an EIS:

  • Comments should provide sufficient detail to explain why the issue raised is significant to the consideration of the potential impacts of the proposed action or the alternatives. Comments on the draft EIS should reference specific sections or pages of the EIS, propose specific changes to the EIS where possible, and include or describe supporting data and methodology. (Section 1503.3(a))
  • The draft EIS must include a summary of all alternatives, information, and analyses submitted by commenters during the scoping process. (Section 1502.17) The lead agency must request comments on the completeness of this summary in the draft EIS, and it must further provide a 30-day comment period on this summary after publication of the final EIS. (Section 1503.1(a)(3), (b)) Based on the summary, the lead agency decision-maker must certify in the ROD that the agency has considered all of the alternatives, information, and analyses submitted by public commenters—the agency is then entitled to a “conclusive presumption” that it considered the information included in the summary of submitted alternatives, information, and analyses in the EIS. (Section 1502.18)
  • There is no duty for the agency to respond to comments that are not substantive or that are not timely submitted during the public comment period. The proposed rules provide that the agency must explain why comments do not warrant a response, but eliminate the existing requirement to cite “the sources, authorities, or reasons” that support this explanation. (Section 1503.4)
  • Agencies may use electronic means to notify those who have requested notice for the proposed action. Agencies also may use electronic means (e.g., project or agency website, email, or social media) to provide notice to the public that a draft or final EIS has been published, except for proposed actions “occurring in whole or part in an area with limited access to high-speed internet.” (Section 1506.6(b)) Agencies also must provide for electronic submission of comments. (Section 1503.1(c)) Agencies may conduct public hearings and meetings by “means of electronic communication,” except where a traditional public meeting is required by law. (Section 1506.6(c))

Categorical Exclusions

Under the proposed rules, if extraordinary circumstances exist that could prevent the use of a categorical exclusion (CE), the agency “should consider whether mitigating circumstances or other conditions are sufficient to avoid significant effects” such that the CE would still apply. (Section 1501.4(b)) CEQ explains that this change “would clarify that the mere presence of extraordinary circumstances does not preclude the application of a CE.” Rather, “the agency could modify the proposed action to avoid the extraordinary circumstances so that the action fits in the [CE].” Agencies also would be authorized to adopt another agency’s determination that a CE applies to a proposed action, “if the adopting agency’s proposed action is substantially the same.” (Section 1506.3(f))

Environmental Assessments

The proposed rules require preparation of an EA if a proposed action is not likely to have significant effects or if the significance of the effects is unknown, unless a CE applies or the agency has decided to prepare an EIS. (Section 1501.5(a)) An EA cannot be more than 75 pages or take more than one year to complete (as measured from the date of decision to prepare an EA to the publication of a final EA), unless a “senior agency official” approves exceeding these limitations in writing and sets new limits. (Sections 1501.5(e) & 1501.10(b)(1))

Limitations on Actions During NEPA Process

In clarifying that ongoing NEPA processes do not preclude an applicant’s development of project plans or designs, the proposed rules specify that an agency considering a proposed action for federal funding may authorize certain activities by the applicant, including acquisition of interests in land, purchase of long lead-time equipment, and purchase of options. (Section 1506.1(b))

Litigation and Remedies

The proposed rules specify that comments or objections that are not submitted in a timely manner will be deemed “unexhausted and forfeited”; that NEPA lawsuits challenging a completed EIS should not be filed until there is a ROD; and that the NEPA regulations “create no presumption that violation of NEPA is a basis for injunctive relief or for a finding of irreparable harm.” (Section 1500.3(b)–(d))

Role of Tribes

The proposed rules add “Tribal” to the phrase “State and local” throughout the NEPA rules to ensure consultation with tribal entities and to reflect existing NEPA practice to coordinate or consult with affected tribal governments and agencies. The proposed rules also eliminate provisions in the current regulations that limit tribal interests to reservations.

Agency NEPA Procedures

If CEQ adopts the proposed rules, agencies would have 12 months after the effective date of the new rules to update their NEPA procedures. (Section 1507.3(a)) These procedures may not impose additional requirements beyond the CEQ rules “except as otherwise provided by law or for agency efficiency.” (Sections 1500.3(a), 1507.3(a)) These procedures also must require the combination of environmental documents with other agency documents, and agencies may designate other statutory processes, reports or analyses that qualify as the “functional equivalent of an EIS” for purposes of complying with NEPA. (Section 1507.3(b))

CEQ’s Request for Additional Input

In addition to the substantial set of changes reflected in its proposed revisions to the existing regulations, CEQ has requested comments by March 10, 2020, on a host of issues, including:

  • Whether to eliminate the current requirement that an agency prepare an EIS when it proposes legislation to Congress, and the proposed legislation would cause significant environmental impacts (such as proposed legislation to withdraw public lands from military use for civilian reuse).
  • Whether non-NEPA studies that one or more agencies already are conducting in relation to a proposed action can be used, “in whole or when aggregated,” as a “functional equivalent” to an EIS for purposes of NEPA compliance.
  • Whether to include in CEQ’s proposed definition of “effects” the concept that the requisite close causal relationship is “analogous to proximate cause in tort law,” and, if so, how CEQ could provide additional clarity regarding the meaning of this phrase.
  • Whether existing CEQ guidance or handbooks should be adopted as part of the revised regulations.
  • How greenhouse gas emissions should be addressed in the new regulations, and specifically, whether CEQ should codify any aspects of its Draft NEPA Guidance on Consideration of Greenhouse Gas Emissions, issued June 2019.
  • Whether the regulations should clarify that NEPA does not apply extraterritorially, in light of the ordinary presumption against extraterritorial application when a statute does not clearly indicate that such application is intended by Congress.
  • Whether there are circumstances under which an agency may authorize irreversible and irretrievable commitments of resources.
  • Whether there should be a threshold (percentage or dollar figure) for the level of “minimal Federal funding” below which a project would not be considered a “major Federal action” subject to NEPA, and whether certain types of financial instruments or other per se categories of federal activities also should be considered exempt.
  • Whether and subject to what procedures CEQ should specifically allow an agency to apply a CE established in another agency’s NEPA procedures to its proposed action.
  • Whether the revised regulations should establish government-wide CEs to exempt certain types of activities from additional NEPA review across the board.
  • Whether the revised regulations should establish a presumptive maximum number of alternatives for evaluation of a proposed action (or for certain categories of proposed actions).
  • Whether the “overall costs” to an agency of obtaining incomplete or unavailable information warrants further definition to address whether certain costs are or are not “unreasonable.”
  • Opportunities for agencies to combine data to streamline environmental review, such as a new single NEPA application that facilitates consolidation of datasets and can run several GIS analyses to help standardize analysis. CEQ envisions this application having a public-facing component to aid prospective project sponsors with site selection and project design and increase public transparency.

Implications of the Proposed Rules

The proposed rules have far-ranging implications for many projects and programs requiring federal government approval, funding, or participation. Some of the revisions clearly are part of the administration’s broader ongoing effort to expedite, streamline, and consolidate the federal agency review process for major infrastructure and energy projects. These procedural changes track closely the concepts and requirements embodied in Title 41 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act (FAST-41) and numerous executive orders.

Other revisions reflect a more fundamental debate around defining the parameters for NEPA review—what categories of federal actions are subject to NEPA, what level of environmental review is appropriate, and what types of impacts and alternatives need to be included in the analysis. Many of the proposed changes appear specifically tailored to advance the current administration’s policies on energy and climate change. The proposal to allow a non-federal project proponent to prepare the EIS may, from a practical perspective, have the greatest impact on the NEPA process. From a legal standpoint, the most significant change from the existing regulations may be eliminating the requirement to evaluate cumulative impacts.

In a White House briefing on January 9, CEQ indicated it intended to make the proposed rules effective immediately upon final adoption, and that federal agencies with projects under NEPA review as of the rules’ effective date would need to decide whether to proceed under the existing NEPA regulations or the revised rules. This may prove challenging given the number of federal agencies that would need to update their NEPA regulations to be consistent with the new rules. Project sponsors with proposals currently under NEPA review should watch developments closely.

As the comments on the new rules begin to pile up, CEQ will be developing its response with one eye firmly on the clock, in order to avoid negation of the final rule under the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. § 801). This law authorizes Congress (via a joint resolution subject to a presidential veto) to disapprove of agency rulemakings. The law has been characterized as a way to prevent “midnight rulemakings” by lame-duck administrations, but it can have significant retroactive effect. The law gives Congress 60 working days to review rules. The clock starts when the rules are formally submitted to Congress or published in the Federal Register, whichever is later. Any rule finalized after September 1, 2020, could be vulnerable to congressional nullification, depending on the outcome of the November election.

If the new rules avoid this fate, ultimately it will fall to the courts to sort out the key question of whether the extensive changes in CEQ’s longstanding regulations constitute a permissible interpretation of NEPA’s statutory requirements. We will continue to monitor closely both CEQ’s rulemaking process for its new regulations as well as the legal, policy, and practical issues raised by the first major regulatory proposal to update the implementation of NEPA since 1978.

[View source.]

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Perkins Coie | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Perkins Coie

Perkins Coie on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide

JD Supra Privacy Policy

Updated: May 25, 2018:

JD Supra is a legal publishing service that connects experts and their content with broader audiences of professionals, journalists and associations.

This Privacy Policy describes how JD Supra, LLC ("JD Supra" or "we," "us," or "our") collects, uses and shares personal data collected from visitors to our website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") who view only publicly-available content as well as subscribers to our services (such as our email digests or author tools)(our "Services"). By using our Website and registering for one of our Services, you are agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Policy.

Please note that if you subscribe to one of our Services, you can make choices about how we collect, use and share your information through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard (available if you are logged into your JD Supra account).

Collection of Information

Registration Information. When you register with JD Supra for our Website and Services, either as an author or as a subscriber, you will be asked to provide identifying information to create your JD Supra account ("Registration Data"), such as your:

  • Email
  • First Name
  • Last Name
  • Company Name
  • Company Industry
  • Title
  • Country

Other Information: We also collect other information you may voluntarily provide. This may include content you provide for publication. We may also receive your communications with others through our Website and Services (such as contacting an author through our Website) or communications directly with us (such as through email, feedback or other forms or social media). If you are a subscribed user, we will also collect your user preferences, such as the types of articles you would like to read.

Information from third parties (such as, from your employer or LinkedIn): We may also receive information about you from third party sources. For example, your employer may provide your information to us, such as in connection with an article submitted by your employer for publication. If you choose to use LinkedIn to subscribe to our Website and Services, we also collect information related to your LinkedIn account and profile.

Your interactions with our Website and Services: As is true of most websites, we gather certain information automatically. This information includes IP addresses, browser type, Internet service provider (ISP), referring/exit pages, operating system, date/time stamp and clickstream data. We use this information to analyze trends, to administer the Website and our Services, to improve the content and performance of our Website and Services, and to track users' movements around the site. We may also link this automatically-collected data to personal information, for example, to inform authors about who has read their articles. Some of this data is collected through information sent by your web browser. We also use cookies and other tracking technologies to collect this information. To learn more about cookies and other tracking technologies that JD Supra may use on our Website and Services please see our "Cookies Guide" page.

How do we use this information?

We use the information and data we collect principally in order to provide our Website and Services. More specifically, we may use your personal information to:

  • Operate our Website and Services and publish content;
  • Distribute content to you in accordance with your preferences as well as to provide other notifications to you (for example, updates about our policies and terms);
  • Measure readership and usage of the Website and Services;
  • Communicate with you regarding your questions and requests;
  • Authenticate users and to provide for the safety and security of our Website and Services;
  • Conduct research and similar activities to improve our Website and Services; and
  • Comply with our legal and regulatory responsibilities and to enforce our rights.

How is your information shared?

  • Content and other public information (such as an author profile) is shared on our Website and Services, including via email digests and social media feeds, and is accessible to the general public.
  • If you choose to use our Website and Services to communicate directly with a company or individual, such communication may be shared accordingly.
  • Readership information is provided to publishing law firms and authors of content to give them insight into their readership and to help them to improve their content.
  • Our Website may offer you the opportunity to share information through our Website, such as through Facebook's "Like" or Twitter's "Tweet" button. We offer this functionality to help generate interest in our Website and content and to permit you to recommend content to your contacts. You should be aware that sharing through such functionality may result in information being collected by the applicable social media network and possibly being made publicly available (for example, through a search engine). Any such information collection would be subject to such third party social media network's privacy policy.
  • Your information may also be shared to parties who support our business, such as professional advisors as well as web-hosting providers, analytics providers and other information technology providers.
  • Any court, governmental authority, law enforcement agency or other third party where we believe disclosure is necessary to comply with a legal or regulatory obligation, or otherwise to protect our rights, the rights of any third party or individuals' personal safety, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security or safety issues.
  • To our affiliated entities and in connection with the sale, assignment or other transfer of our company or our business.

How We Protect Your Information

JD Supra takes reasonable and appropriate precautions to insure that user information is protected from loss, misuse and unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration and destruction. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. You should keep in mind that no Internet transmission is ever 100% secure or error-free. Where you use log-in credentials (usernames, passwords) on our Website, please remember that it is your responsibility to safeguard them. If you believe that your log-in credentials have been compromised, please contact us at privacy@jdsupra.com.

Children's Information

Our Website and Services are not directed at children under the age of 16 and we do not knowingly collect personal information from children under the age of 16 through our Website and/or Services. If you have reason to believe that a child under the age of 16 has provided personal information to us, please contact us, and we will endeavor to delete that information from our databases.

Links to Other Websites

Our Website and Services may contain links to other websites. The operators of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using our Website or Services and click a link to another site, you will leave our Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We are not responsible for the data collection and use practices of such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of our Website and Services and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Information for EU and Swiss Residents

JD Supra's principal place of business is in the United States. By subscribing to our website, you expressly consent to your information being processed in the United States.

  • Our Legal Basis for Processing: Generally, we rely on our legitimate interests in order to process your personal information. For example, we rely on this legal ground if we use your personal information to manage your Registration Data and administer our relationship with you; to deliver our Website and Services; understand and improve our Website and Services; report reader analytics to our authors; to personalize your experience on our Website and Services; and where necessary to protect or defend our or another's rights or property, or to detect, prevent, or otherwise address fraud, security, safety or privacy issues. Please see Article 6(1)(f) of the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR") In addition, there may be other situations where other grounds for processing may exist, such as where processing is a result of legal requirements (GDPR Article 6(1)(c)) or for reasons of public interest (GDPR Article 6(1)(e)). Please see the "Your Rights" section of this Privacy Policy immediately below for more information about how you may request that we limit or refrain from processing your personal information.
  • Your Rights
    • Right of Access/Portability: You can ask to review details about the information we hold about you and how that information has been used and disclosed. Note that we may request to verify your identification before fulfilling your request. You can also request that your personal information is provided to you in a commonly used electronic format so that you can share it with other organizations.
    • Right to Correct Information: You may ask that we make corrections to any information we hold, if you believe such correction to be necessary.
    • Right to Restrict Our Processing or Erasure of Information: You also have the right in certain circumstances to ask us to restrict processing of your personal information or to erase your personal information. Where you have consented to our use of your personal information, you can withdraw your consent at any time.

You can make a request to exercise any of these rights by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

You can also manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard.

We will make all practical efforts to respect your wishes. There may be times, however, where we are not able to fulfill your request, for example, if applicable law prohibits our compliance. Please note that JD Supra does not use "automatic decision making" or "profiling" as those terms are defined in the GDPR.

  • Timeframe for retaining your personal information: We will retain your personal information in a form that identifies you only for as long as it serves the purpose(s) for which it was initially collected as stated in this Privacy Policy, or subsequently authorized. We may continue processing your personal information for longer periods, but only for the time and to the extent such processing reasonably serves the purposes of archiving in the public interest, journalism, literature and art, scientific or historical research and statistical analysis, and subject to the protection of this Privacy Policy. For example, if you are an author, your personal information may continue to be published in connection with your article indefinitely. When we have no ongoing legitimate business need to process your personal information, we will either delete or anonymize it, or, if this is not possible (for example, because your personal information has been stored in backup archives), then we will securely store your personal information and isolate it from any further processing until deletion is possible.
  • Onward Transfer to Third Parties: As noted in the "How We Share Your Data" Section above, JD Supra may share your information with third parties. When JD Supra discloses your personal information to third parties, we have ensured that such third parties have either certified under the EU-U.S. or Swiss Privacy Shield Framework and will process all personal data received from EU member states/Switzerland in reliance on the applicable Privacy Shield Framework or that they have been subjected to strict contractual provisions in their contract with us to guarantee an adequate level of data protection for your data.

California Privacy Rights

Pursuant to Section 1798.83 of the California Civil Code, our customers who are California residents have the right to request certain information regarding our disclosure of personal information to third parties for their direct marketing purposes.

You can make a request for this information by emailing us at privacy@jdsupra.com or by writing to us at:

Privacy Officer
JD Supra, LLC
10 Liberty Ship Way, Suite 300
Sausalito, California 94965

Some browsers have incorporated a Do Not Track (DNT) feature. These features, when turned on, send a signal that you prefer that the website you are visiting not collect and use data regarding your online searching and browsing activities. As there is not yet a common understanding on how to interpret the DNT signal, we currently do not respond to DNT signals on our site.

Access/Correct/Update/Delete Personal Information

For non-EU/Swiss residents, if you would like to know what personal information we have about you, you can send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com. We will be in contact with you (by mail or otherwise) to verify your identity and provide you the information you request. We will respond within 30 days to your request for access to your personal information. In some cases, we may not be able to remove your personal information, in which case we will let you know if we are unable to do so and why. If you would like to correct or update your personal information, you can manage your profile and subscriptions through our Privacy Center under the "My Account" dashboard. If you would like to delete your account or remove your information from our Website and Services, send an e-mail to privacy@jdsupra.com.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Privacy Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our Privacy Policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use our Website and Services following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this Privacy Policy, the practices of this site, your dealings with our Website or Services, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

JD Supra Cookie Guide

As with many websites, JD Supra's website (located at www.jdsupra.com) (our "Website") and our services (such as our email article digests)(our "Services") use a standard technology called a "cookie" and other similar technologies (such as, pixels and web beacons), which are small data files that are transferred to your computer when you use our Website and Services. These technologies automatically identify your browser whenever you interact with our Website and Services.

How We Use Cookies and Other Tracking Technologies

We use cookies and other tracking technologies to:

  1. Improve the user experience on our Website and Services;
  2. Store the authorization token that users receive when they login to the private areas of our Website. This token is specific to a user's login session and requires a valid username and password to obtain. It is required to access the user's profile information, subscriptions, and analytics;
  3. Track anonymous site usage; and
  4. Permit connectivity with social media networks to permit content sharing.

There are different types of cookies and other technologies used our Website, notably:

  • "Session cookies" - These cookies only last as long as your online session, and disappear from your computer or device when you close your browser (like Internet Explorer, Google Chrome or Safari).
  • "Persistent cookies" - These cookies stay on your computer or device after your browser has been closed and last for a time specified in the cookie. We use persistent cookies when we need to know who you are for more than one browsing session. For example, we use them to remember your preferences for the next time you visit.
  • "Web Beacons/Pixels" - Some of our web pages and emails may also contain small electronic images known as web beacons, clear GIFs or single-pixel GIFs. These images are placed on a web page or email and typically work in conjunction with cookies to collect data. We use these images to identify our users and user behavior, such as counting the number of users who have visited a web page or acted upon one of our email digests.

JD Supra Cookies. We place our own cookies on your computer to track certain information about you while you are using our Website and Services. For example, we place a session cookie on your computer each time you visit our Website. We use these cookies to allow you to log-in to your subscriber account. In addition, through these cookies we are able to collect information about how you use the Website, including what browser you may be using, your IP address, and the URL address you came from upon visiting our Website and the URL you next visit (even if those URLs are not on our Website). We also utilize email web beacons to monitor whether our emails are being delivered and read. We also use these tools to help deliver reader analytics to our authors to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

Analytics/Performance Cookies. JD Supra also uses the following analytic tools to help us analyze the performance of our Website and Services as well as how visitors use our Website and Services:

  • HubSpot - For more information about HubSpot cookies, please visit legal.hubspot.com/privacy-policy.
  • New Relic - For more information on New Relic cookies, please visit www.newrelic.com/privacy.
  • Google Analytics - For more information on Google Analytics cookies, visit www.google.com/policies. To opt-out of being tracked by Google Analytics across all websites visit http://tools.google.com/dlpage/gaoptout. This will allow you to download and install a Google Analytics cookie-free web browser.

Facebook, Twitter and other Social Network Cookies. Our content pages allow you to share content appearing on our Website and Services to your social media accounts through the "Like," "Tweet," or similar buttons displayed on such pages. To accomplish this Service, we embed code that such third party social networks provide and that we do not control. These buttons know that you are logged in to your social network account and therefore such social networks could also know that you are viewing the JD Supra Website.

Controlling and Deleting Cookies

If you would like to change how a browser uses cookies, including blocking or deleting cookies from the JD Supra Website and Services you can do so by changing the settings in your web browser. To control cookies, most browsers allow you to either accept or reject all cookies, only accept certain types of cookies, or prompt you every time a site wishes to save a cookie. It's also easy to delete cookies that are already saved on your device by a browser.

The processes for controlling and deleting cookies vary depending on which browser you use. To find out how to do so with a particular browser, you can use your browser's "Help" function or alternatively, you can visit http://www.aboutcookies.org which explains, step-by-step, how to control and delete cookies in most browsers.

Updates to This Policy

We may update this cookie policy and our Privacy Policy from time-to-time, particularly as technology changes. You can always check this page for the latest version. We may also notify you of changes to our privacy policy by email.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about how we use cookies and other tracking technologies, please contact us at: privacy@jdsupra.com.

- hide

This website uses cookies to improve user experience, track anonymous site usage, store authorization tokens and permit sharing on social media networks. By continuing to browse this website you accept the use of cookies. Click here to read more about how we use cookies.