Will FBI Fraud Ring Probe Get Michigan AGC To Enforce Ethics?

by Michigan Auto Law

FBI fraud ring investigation will hopefully force Attorney Grievance Commission and Administrator Alan Gershel to take long overdue disciplinary action against ambulance-chasing, solicitation injury lawyers who break the law

Will FBI investigation into No-Fault fraud ring get Attorney Grievance Commission to go after ambulance-chasing, solicitation lawyers?

Will an FBI investigation into an alleged No-Fault fraud ring in Detroit be enough to finally get the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission and its administrator Alan M. Gershel to crackdown on ambulance chasing personal injury lawyers who have been brazenly committing unlawful solicitation and perpetrating fraud?

I certainly hope so.

If not, then we ought to just put an end to the charade that there is actually any meaningful enforcement to the ethical rules that are ostensibly supposed to protect the public and oversee lawyers in this state so they act ethically, fairly and professionally. It has now been nearly two decades since the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission has prosecuted an attorney for solicitation and ambulance chasing. During this same period, acts of aggressive and brazen attorney solicitation of auto accident victims have literally exploded, first in Detroit and then have spread throughout the state.

Last week, the Detroit News’ George Hunter broke important news that only confirms what too many of my fellow accident lawyers have known for too many years:

Without active, committed enforcement of Michigan’s ambulance-chasing and anti-solicitation laws, No-Fault fraud rings – headed by lawyer kingpins who use investigators and proxy groups – will continue to break the law and harm the public, jeopardizing the entire No-Fault system itself and the rule of law.

In his April 25, 2018, “Detroit police sergeant suspended amid FBI probe,” Hunter reported that, according to internal Detroit Police memos obtained by the Detroit News:

  • The FBI is investigating a Detroit police sergeant for selling “information in traffic crash reports to a third party, who used the stolen material to perpetrate fraud” by contacting “drivers and passengers, and convince[ing] them to obtain unnecessary legal and medical services, and file lawsuits …”
  • The memos revealed that the sergeant “confirmed she has been providing [“sensitive and privileged”] information [“collected from victims involved in motor vehicle accidents throughout the City of Detroit”] contained in State of Michigan UD-10 Crash Reports prepared by various members of the Detroit Police Department to a ‘third party’ on a daily basis, which allowed the ‘third party’ to contact victims and solicit them” and, in return, the sergeant “would be compensated anywhere from $1,000 to $1,200 a week for the information she provided …”
  • The memos also explained that the “‘third party’ would make direct contact with involved victims and passengers in an attempt to solicit them into receiving legal and medical assistance, which would normally not be required,” plus, “the information would be utilized to generate or inflate fraudulent claims, as well as to assist in seeking civil and personal injury lawsuits …”

Exposing dirty car accident lawyers in No-Fault fraud ring is essential to stopping ambulance-chasing, unlawful solicitation that harms the public

Ten years ago, it would have been easy for me to guess who the unnamed “third party” is – regardless whether he or she is the actual lawyer who’s providing the “unnecessary” legal services and/or “seeking civil and personal injury lawsuits” or whether the “third party” was just hired by and works for the lawyer.

That’s because ten years ago, there were only a couple lawyers doing this and everyone knew who they were. My friends on the insurance defense side would tell me that the insurance companies they worked with had “fraud units” set up for these individual law firms.

Ten years later, not much has happened. We’ve seen a couple fraud and RICO lawsuits that tangentially name some personal injury lawyers that were filed by the insurance companies against some medical providers, but no prosecution of the culprit attorneys by the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission.

And that failure to act by Alan Gershel and the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission is why I can no longer easily name who this “third party” is. During the last ten years, other car accident lawyers have watched as the offending lawyers continue to profit and seemingly face no repercussions, and they have also jumped on the bandwagon of illegal activity.

Attorney solicitation and the practice of car accident law today is uglier than I’ve ever seen it during my time as an attorney, and much of the blame lies directly with the Attorney Grievance Commission for its intentional and deliberate failure to act.

Perhaps through this FBI investigation, we will learn of the car accident lawyer or lawyers involved in these criminal enterprises. If so, this may be the only way the AGC is ever going to start cracking down on the ambulance-chasing lawyers who have been so brazenly flouting the law and undermining the image of our profession.

By shining a light on the lawyer or lawyers involved in this fraud ring, the FBI investigation may even force the AGC and Gershel to finally act.

The most recent and very troubling example of the AGC’s and Gershel’s decisions to “look the other way” is their dismissal of a discipline case against a lawyer whose “runner” engaged in a “cold call” solicitation of an auto accident victim as she lay in her hospital bed, trying to heal.

News of fraud ring shows that the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission is Broken 

I know lawyers who practice car accident injury law all over the country. I’ve been amazed for years that actions that can get a lawyer suspended or even disbarred in other states won’t even result in an investigation by our current AGC. Don’t believe me? A Chicago lawyer who intends to leave a law firm and solicits current clients of that law firm to sign new retainer agreements before leaving that firm risks having his law license taken away. But in Michigan, I’ve known of numerous examples from other attorneys where our own AGC will do nothing.

The problem is that failing to enforce ethical violations opens the door to much larger unethical and even criminal lack acts by Michigan lawyers.

Many Michigan lawyers now believe the Michigan Attorney Grievance Commission is seriously broken. Illegal ambulance chasing runs rampant. I’ve personally informed the AGC of this for years. Ethical rules are not being enforced. Good lawyers who do play by the rules are extremely discouraged by what we see happening now. Entire law firms are engaging in massive PIP fraud, and good lawyers all over the state who play by the rules are hurt by all of this. Even worse, the innocent public is being hurt by all of this.

This is why the lack of any response by the AGC has been so disappointing.

Many lawyers know firsthand or strongly suspect they know at least some of the things that are going on. Word always gets around. The fact that lawyers still see the bad lawyers who are breaking the ethical rules continue to practice law has a terrible and corrosive effect on everyone else. It lets lawyers know that you can break the most important ethical rules of our profession, harm the public, illegally solicit cases, send investigators into hospital rooms, buy police reports from crooked cops (as we have seen in Flint and now Detroit), steal from law firms, and do far worse that I am not yet at liberty to write about, and still seemingly get away with all of it.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Michigan Auto Law | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Michigan Auto Law

Michigan Auto Law on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.


JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.